This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Update on Second-Row Children Responses in Rear and Frontal Crashes with a Focus on the Potential Effect of Stiffening Front Seat Structures
Technical Paper
2020-01-1215
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
This content contains downloadable datasets
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
NHTSA has recently been petitioned to address the protection of second-row children in rear crashes due front seatback performance. The protection of children is important. However, it is more complex than assessing front seat performance in rear impacts. Viano, Parenteau (2008 [1]) analyzed cases of serious-to-fatally injured (MAIS 3+F) children up to 7 years old in the second row in rear impacts involving 1990+ model year vehicles using 1997-2005 NASS-CDS. They observed that intrusion was an important factor pushing the child forward into the back of the front seat, B-pillar or other front structure.
To help assess whether stiffening the front seats would be beneficial for second-row child safety, the 2008 study was updated using more recent data and model year vehicles. In the present study, 1997-2015 NASS-CDS data were analyzed for serious-to-fatally (MAIS 3+F) injured 0- to 7-year old children in the second row with 1994+ model year vehicles. First, the data were analyzed to estimate the distribution and risk of serious-to-fatally (MAIS 3+F) injured children by crash types. The results showed that the greatest numbers of second-row children were injured in frontal (39.3%) and in side (27.2%) crashes. Compared to other crash types, the highest relative injury risk for second-row children was found in rollovers (1.72% ± 0.36%) followed by rear crashes (0.75% ± 0.56%).
Individual rear and frontal impact cases were also reviewed to better understand injury mechanisms of children in the second row. The cases were downloaded and reviewed. The unweighted data indicated that there were 15 injured children involved in 14 rear impact crashes. Seven of the cases were new and not previously included in the 2008 study. The analysis of the 15 children indicated that half were associated with significant intrusion (30+ cm) into their seating area, pushing the child forward. The case review indicated that the front seat remained in its pre-crash position or was pushed forward in 7 out of 11 cases. The front seatback rotated rearward in 4 of 11 cases; two involved a severe-to-fatal injury (AIS 4+). In both cases, the child was pushed forward due to significant intrusion.
There were 34 unweighted cases involving children with serious (AIS 3+) head and spine injury in frontal crashes. Eleven of the cases were new and not previously included in the 2008 study. The data indicated that contact with the seatback was a frequent injury source (12 out of 34 cases).
A 54 km/h sled test previously conducted with an unbelted 6-year-old Hybrid III anthropomorphic test device (ATD) seated behind a stiff all-belts-to-seat (ABTS) seat was also analyzed. The head and chest acceleration and upper neck compression and flexion recorded in the test were all above injury assessment reference values (IARVs).
The field accident data and results from the sled test performed in this study suggest that stiffening the front seatback could increase impact forces and risk of injury due to increased resistance of the seatback to yielding forward during second-row occupant loading.
Recommended Content
Authors
Topic
Citation
Parenteau, C. and Viano, D., "Update on Second-Row Children Responses in Rear and Frontal Crashes with a Focus on the Potential Effect of Stiffening Front Seat Structures," SAE Technical Paper 2020-01-1215, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4271/2020-01-1215.Data Sets - Support Documents
| Title | Description | Download |
|---|---|---|
| Unnamed Dataset 1 | ||
| Unnamed Dataset 2 | ||
| Unnamed Dataset 3 | ||
| Unnamed Dataset 4 |
Also In
References
- Viano , D.C. and Parenteau , C.S. Field Accident Data of 2nd Row Children and Individual Case Review SAE Technical Paper 2008-01-1851 2008 https://doi.org/10.4271/2008-01-1851
- Ditlow, CAS (Center for Auto Safety) March 9, 2016 https://www.autosafety.org/nhtsa-urged-to-warn-parents-of-seat-back-failure-dangers-to-children-in-rear-seats
- Viano , D.C. and Parenteau , C.S. Front Seat Performance in Rear Impacts: Effect on 1st and 2nd Row Occupant Injury SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars - Mech. Syst. 2 1 462 481 2009 https://doi.org/10.4271/2009-01-0252
- Viano , D.C. and Parenteau , C.S. Fatalities of Children 0-7 Years Old in the 2nd Row Traffic Injury Prevention 9 3 231 237 2008
- Arbogast , K.B. , Lincoln , A.E. , and Winston , F.K. Pediatric Facial Fractures: Implications for Regulation SAE Technical Paper 2002-01-0025 2002 https://doi.org/10.4271/2002-01-0025
- Parenteau , C. and Viano , D.C. Field Data Analysis of Rear Occupant Injuries. Part II: Children, Toddlers and Infants SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-0154 2003 https://doi.org/10.4271/2003-01-0154
- Bohman , K. , Arbogast , K.B. , and Bostrom , O. Head Injury Causation Scenarios for Belted, Rear-Seated Children in Frontal Impacts Traffic Inj Prev. 12 1 62 70 2011
- Arbogast , K.B. , Wozniak , S. , Locey , C.M. , Maltese , M.R. , and Zonfrillo , M.R. Head Impact Contact Points for Restrained Child Occupants Traffic Inj Prev. 13 2 172 181 2012
- Jermakian , J.S. , Edwards , M.A. , Fein , S. , Maltese , M.R. April 2019
- Viano , D. , Parenteau , C. , Prasad , P. , and Burnett , R. Occupant Responses in High-Speed Rear Crashes: Analysis of Government-Sponsored Tests SAE Technical Paper 2008-01-0188 2008 https://doi.org/10.4271/2008-01-0188
- 2002
- Mertz , H.J. , Irwin , A.L. , and Prasad , P. Biomechanical and Scaling Basis for Frontal and Side Impact Injury Assessment Reference Values Stapp Car Crash J. 60 625 657 2016 Nov
- Viano , D.C. and White , S. Seat Strength in Rear Body Block Tests Traffic Injury Prevention 17 5 502 507 2016
- Viano , D.C. , Parenteau , C.S. , Burnett , R. , and Prasad , P. Occupant Responses in Conventional and ABTS Seats in High-Speed Rear Sled Tests with a Normally Seated Dummy Traffic Injury Prevention 2 19(1) 54 59 2018
- Viano , D.C. and Parenteau , C.S. Effectiveness of the Revision to FMVSS 301: FARS and NASS-CDS Analysis of Fatalities and Severe Injuries in Rear Impacts Accident Analysis and Prevention 89 1 8 2016
- NHTSA December 1992
- Kahane , C.J. , Tarbet , M.J. November 2006
- NHTSA August 18, 1995
- Sahraei , E. , Soudbakhsh , D. , and Digges , K. Protection of Rear Seat Occupants in Frontal Crashes, Controlling for Occupant and Crash Characteristics SAE Technical Paper 2009-22-0003 2009 https://doi.org/10.4271/2009-22-0003
- Sahraei , E. , Digges , K. , and Marzougui , D. Reduced Protection for Belted Occupants in Rear Seats Relative to Front Seats of New Model Year Vehicles Annals of Advances in Automotive Medicine/Annual Scientific Conference 54 149 2010
- Durbin , D.R. , Jermakian , J.S. , Kallan , M.J. , McCartt , A.T. et al. Rear Seat Safety: Variation in Protection by Occupant, Crash and Vehicle Characteristics Accident Analysis & Prevention 80 185 192 2015
- Beck , B. , Bilston , L.E. , and Brown , J. Injury Patterns of Rear Seat Occupants in Frontal Impact: An In-Depth Crash Investigation Study Injury Prevention 22 3 165 170 2016
- Tatem , W.M. and Gabler , H.C. 2019
- 2016