This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
A Human Body Model Study on Restraints for Side-Facing Occupants in Frontal Crashes of an Automated Vehicle
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 14, 2020 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
This study was to investigate kinematics and responses of side-facing seated occupants in frontal crashes of an automated minivan using Global Human Body Models Consortium (GHBMC) simplified occupant models (50th%ile male and 5th%ile female), and to develop new restraint concepts to protect the occupants. The latest GHBMC M50-OS and F05-OS models (version 2.2) were further validated with Postmortem Human Subject (PMHS) side sled tests . Robustness and biofidelity of the GHBMC human models, especially for the pelvis region, were enhanced. Using the update M50-OS and F05-OS models, we evaluated the body kinematics and injury measures of the side-facing seated occupants in frontal crashes of a minivan at severities ranging from 24 kph (15 mph) to 56 kph (35 mph). Three restraint configurations were studied: 1) no restraint; 2) lap belt only; 3) lap and head/torso restraints. Parametric studies on the restraint configurations and design parameters of each restraint were performed to mitigate the occupant injury risks of the body regions of head, chest, abdomen, pelvis and knee-thigh-hip. The results showed that the occupant kinematics and responses differed significantly with the occupant size, crash severity, and restraint conditions. The lap restraint alone did not prevent high injury risks of occupants in the frontal crashes at severities of more than 40kph (25mph). The conceptual lap and head/torso restraints improved the occupant kinematics and greatly reduced the injury risks.
CitationZhao, J., Katagiri, M., Decker, W., Lee, S. et al., "A Human Body Model Study on Restraints for Side-Facing Occupants in Frontal Crashes of an Automated Vehicle," SAE Technical Paper 2020-01-0980, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4271/2020-01-0980.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 3]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 4]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 5]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 6]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 7]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 8]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 9]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 10]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 11]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 12]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 13]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 14]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 15]|
- American Samoa Highway Safety Annual Report FF 2018 , Federal Fiscal year 2018, December 31, 201.
- U.S. Department of Transportation , “Preparing for The Future of Transportation Automated Vehicles 3.0,” October 2018, http://www.transportation.gov/av.
- Jorlöv, S., Bohman, K., and Larsson, A. , “Seating Positions and Activities in Highly Automated Cars - A Qualitative Study of Future Automated Driving Scenarios,” in IRCOBI conference 2017, IRC-17-11.
- Kitagawa, Y., Hayashi, S., Yamada, K. et al. , “Occupant Kinematics in Simulated Autonomous Driving Vehicle Collisions:Influence of Seating Position, Direction and Angle,” Stapp Car Crash Journal 61:101-155, November 2017.
- Humm, J.R., Yoganandan, N., Pintar, F.A. et al. , “Responses and Injuries to PMHS in Side-facing and Oblique Seats in Horizontal Longitudinal Sled Tests per FAA Emergency Landing Conditions,” Stapp Car Crash Journal 60:135-163, November 2016.
- Schwartz, D., Guleyupoglu, B., Koya, B., Joel, D. et al. , “Development of a Computationally Efficient Full Human Body Finite Element Model,” Traffic Injury Prevention 16(sup 1):S49-S56, doi:10.1080/15389588.2015.1021418.
- Cavanaugh, J., Walilko, T., Malhotra, A., Zhu, Y. et al. , “Biomechanical Response and Injury Tolerance of the Pelvis in Twelve Sled Side Impacts,” SAE Technical Paper 902305, 1990, https://doi.org/10.4271/902305.
- Kemper, A.R., McNally, C., Kennedy, E.A., Manoogian, S.J., and Duma, S.M. , “The Influence of Arm Position on Thoracic Response in Side Impacts,” Stapp Car Crash J. 52:379-420, 2008.
- Perez-Rapela, D., Markusic, C., Whitcomb, B., Pipkorn, B. et al. , “Comparison of the Simplified GHBMC to PMHS Kinematics in Far-side Impact,” in IRCOBI conference 2019, IRC-19-42.
- Takhounts, E., Craig, M., Moorhouse, K., and McFadden, J. , “Development of Brain Injury Criteria (BrIC),” Stapp Car Crash J. 57:243-266, 2013.
- Kuppa, S., Wang, J., Haffner, M., and Eppinger, R. , “Lower Extremity Injuries and Associated Injury Criteria,” ESV Paper No. 457, 2017.
- Rouhana, S.W., El-Jawahri, R., and Laituri, T. , “Biomechanical Considerations for Abdominal Loading by Seat Belt Pretensioners,” Stapp Car Crash J. 54:381-406, 2010.
- Leport, T., Baudrit, P., Trosseille, X., Petit, P. et al. , “Assessment of the Pubic Force as a Pelvic Injury Criterion in Side Impact,” Stapp Car Crash J. 51:467-488, 2007.
- Kuppa, S. , “Injury Criteria for Side Impact Dummies,” National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2006.
- Eppinger, R., Sun, E., Bandak, F., and Haffner, M. , “Development of Improved Injury Critreria for the Assessment of Advanced Automotive Restraint Systems-II,” National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1999.
- Koh, S.-W. et al. , “Shoulder Injury and Response due to Lateral Glenohumeral Joint Impact: An Analysis of Combined Data,” Stapp Car Crash Journal 49:291-322, 2005.
- Viano, D. , “Biomechanical Responses and Injuries in Blunt Lateral Impact,” SAE Technical Paper 892432, 1989, https://doi.org/10.4271/892432.
- Bouquet, R. et al. “Pelvis Human Response to Lateral Impact,” in Proceedings of the 16th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, Windsor, ON, Canada. 1998.
- Stalnaker, R., Tarrière, C., Fayon, A., Walfisch, G. et al. , “Modification of Part 572 Dummy for Lateral Impact According to Biomechanical Data,” SAE Technical Paper 791031, 1979, https://doi.org/10.4271/791031.