This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Dynamic Strength Co-Simulation for Valve Train Mechanism Design Virtual Validation
Technical Paper
2020-01-0949
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
This content contains downloadable datasets
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
As the automotive market is very dynamic and vehicle manufactures try to reduce the vehicle development cycle time, more focus is being given to CAE simulation technologies to reduce the design cycle time and number of physical tests. CAE engineers are continuously working on improving the accuracy of CAE simulation, such as using flexible body dynamic simulation in place of linear static analysis. Strength calculation under dynamic condition is more accurate as compared to static condition as it gives more clear understanding of stress variation with motion, contacts and mass inertia.
Failure has been observed in new development of valve train pivot screw under test conditions. As per linear static analysis, design was judged OK. Normal linear static analysis is a two stage process. In first stage loads are calculated by hand or peak loads are taken from multibody dynamics (MBD) rigid body analysis. In second stage, stress calculation is carried out for peak load in quasi-static condition using finite element analysis (FEA). To investigate the reason of failure and prediction of stress in new proto part, flexible MBD stress analysis is carried out using ADAMS and Nastran software. Under co-simulation approach load extraction and stress calculation is carried out simultaneously. Dynamic simulation model consists of both flexible and rigid links. Using co-simulation process faster and more accurate transient stress analysis is carried out taking the advantage of both MBD and FEA approach.
This paper will present the methodology of CAE process for dynamic strength co-simulation by establishing the correlation of FEA and test results for failure investigation of valve train pivot screw. Using the new CAE process, further design optimization were carried out by validating different designs initially through simulation and final design through physical testing. Optimized design smoothly passed the required testing criteria.
Authors
Topic
Citation
Choudhary, V., Singh, B., Poonia, S., and Singh, J., "Dynamic Strength Co-Simulation for Valve Train Mechanism Design Virtual Validation," SAE Technical Paper 2020-01-0949, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4271/2020-01-0949.Data Sets - Support Documents
| Title | Description | Download |
|---|---|---|
| Unnamed Dataset 1 | ||
| Unnamed Dataset 2 | ||
| Unnamed Dataset 3 | ||
| Unnamed Dataset 4 | ||
| Unnamed Dataset 5 | ||
| Unnamed Dataset 6 |
Also In
References
- Lin , Y. , Ramachandra , P. , and Tanaka , Y. Valve Train Dynamic Analysis and Validation SAE Technical Paper 2004-01-1457 2004 https://doi.org/10.4271/2004-01-1457
- Montazersadgh , F. and Fatemi , A. Dynamic Load and Stress Analysis of a Crankshaft SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-0258 2007 https://doi.org/10.4271/2007-01-0258
- Moon , D. , Kim , G. , and Hwang , Y. A Flexible Multi-Body Dynamic Model for Analyzing the Hysteretic Characteristics and the Dynamic Stress of a Taper Leaf Spring SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-0852 2007 https://doi.org/10.4271/2007-01-0852
- Yoon , J. and Kye , K. Suspension Abuse Test Simulation Using Modal Stress Recovery SAE Technical Paper 2004-01-0776 2004 https://doi.org/10.4271/2004-01-0776