This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
What If the Speed Had Been Less? Causation in Time Limited and Distance Limited Hazards
Technical Paper
2020-01-0881
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
This content contains downloadable datasets
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
With a path intrusion incident, it is almost always the case that the collision would have been avoided if the pedestrian had not run out, or if the vehicle on the minor road had stopped, or so on. However should the other party be thought to have been travelling at an excessive speed, often the reconstructionist is asked to make a calculation of what whether the collision would, at some alternative speed say equal to the speed limit, still have occurred. In that way causation is addressed.
The paper distinguishes between those hazards which are distance limited and those which are time limited, giving definitions of the two types. Distance limited hazards are deterministic, but time limited hazards have a probabilistic basis. This difference has important implications for causation.
For a hazard at a fixed distance, there is a well known formula for calculating whether the collision would have been avoided at a slower alternative speed. However a time limited hazard often has no clear cut boundary between avoided/not avoided. According to the warning time during which the hazard develops, the alternative speed of the vehicle may mean that a collision would certainly be avoided, the alternative speed may have no effect, or the effect of the alternative speed may be in between. A method is given for estimating the effect of a slower speed.
A further type of path intrusion is where the pedestrian, or driver on a minor road, has seen the oncoming vehicle but gauged that there was time to cross in front of it. This also is considered, with its implications for causation.
Traffic lights, where one must not go over on red, have similarities and differences with path intrusion incidents. The paper gives a formula for the maximum speed at which a traffic light might be approached if drivers made the best choices, with a discussion of the difference between the unrealistic result of this calculation and a realistic maximum.
Recommended Content
Technical Paper | Comparison of Head Kinematics of Bicyclist in Car-to-Bicycle Impact |
Technical Paper | Motorist Warning System on Road Bends in Hilly Regions for Safer Riding |
Technical Paper | Driver Response Time to Cyclist Path Intrusions |
Authors
Topic
Citation
Searle, J., "What If the Speed Had Been Less? Causation in Time Limited and Distance Limited Hazards," SAE Technical Paper 2020-01-0881, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4271/2020-01-0881.Data Sets - Support Documents
Title | Description | Download |
---|---|---|
Unnamed Dataset 1 |
Also In
References
- Lerner , N.D. Brake Perception-Reaction Times of Older and Younger Drivers 37 Meeting, Human Factors and Ergonomics Soc. Washington 206 210 1993
- Fambro , D.B. , Koppa , R.J. , Picha , D.L. , and Fitzpatrick , K. Driver Perception - Brake Response in Stopping Sight Distance Situations 78th Meeting of the Transportation Research Board Washington 1998
- Maeda , T. , Irie , N. , Hidaka , K. , and Nashimura , H. Performance of Driver-Vehicle System in Emergency Avoidance SAE Technical Paper 770130 1977 https://doi.org/10.4271/770130
- Mazzae , E.N. , Barickman , F.S. , Farkenbrock , G. , and Baldwin , G.H.S. 2003
- Sinca , J.C. , Cacheda , M.C. , and Diez , F.P. Methodological Analysis about the Potential Avoidability of Motor Vehicles against Pedestrians in Urban Areas Transportation Research Procedia 18 127 134 2016
- Marks , C. Some Fundamental Flaws and Fallacies in Motor Vehicle Crash Analysis Australian and South Pacific Crash Investigators Conf. 2004
- Vaughan , R. Avoiding the Emerging Pedestrian: A Mathematical Model SAE Technical Paper 970962 1997 https://doi.org/10.4271/970962
- Greatrix , G. and Smithies , J. 1996
- Reade , M.W. and Becker , T.L. Fundamentals of Pedestrian/Cyclist Traffic Crash Reconstruction Jacksonville, USA IPTM 2016 133