This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
The GTU: A New Realistic Generic Pickup Truck and SUV Model
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 14, 2020 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
Traditionally, ground vehicle aerodynamics has been researched with highly simplified models such as the Ahmed body and the SAE model. These models established and advanced the fundamental understanding of bluff body aerodynamics and have generated a large body of published data, however, their application to the development of passenger vehicles is limited by the highly idealized nature of their geometries. To date, limited data has been openly published on aerodynamic investigations of production vehicles, most likely due to the proprietary nature of production vehicle geometry. In 2012, Heft et al. introduced the realistic generic car model ‘DrivAer’ that better represents the flow physics associated with a typical production vehicle. The introduction of the DrivAer model has led to a broad set of published data for both experimental and computational investigations and has proven itself invaluable as a correlation and calibration tool of wind tunnels, the validation of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) codes and increasing the understanding of the fundamental flow physics around passenger vehicles.
Automotive sales trends in the United States, published by the Bureau of Economic Analysis in 2018, indicate that sales of Pickup Trucks (PUs) and Sports Utility Vehicles (SUVs) have increased over the past 10 years and are outselling sedans at a rate just over two to one. Compared to sedans, PU and SUV body styles pose additional aerodynamic challenges due to their complex wake structures. The introduction of a realistic generic PU and SUV model as an open access tool is expected to yield benefits to the wider community, equivalent to those of the DrivAer passenger vehicle. This paper introduces the Generic Truck Utility (GTU) as a realistic, generic PU truck and interchangeable SUV model. The paper will focus on the design and development of the GTU and will present a summary of preliminary experimental results of the GTU complemented by numerical simulations using iconCFD®, an open source based CFD solver.
CitationWoodiga, S., Howard, K., Norman, P., Lewington, N. et al., "The GTU: A New Realistic Generic Pickup Truck and SUV Model," SAE Technical Paper 2020-01-0664, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4271/2020-01-0664.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 3]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 4]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 5]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 6]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 7]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 8]|
- Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S. Department of Commerce , “Auto and Truck Season Adjustment,” https://www.bea.gov/docs/gdp/auto-and-truck-seasonal-adjustment, Nov. 2019.
- Le Good, G. and Garry, K. , “On the Use of Reference Models in Automotive Aerodynamics,” SAE Technical Paper 2004-01-1308, 2004, https://doi.org/10.4271/2004-01-1308.
- Heft, A., Indinger, T., and Adams, N. , “Introduction of a New Realistic Generic Car Model for Aerodynamic Investigations,” SAE Technical Paper 2012-01-0168, 2012, https://doi.org/10.4271/2012-01-0168.
- Peters, B., Uddin, M., Bain, J., Curley, A. et al. , “Simulating DrivAer with Structured Finite Difference Overset Grids,” SAE Technical Paper 2015-01-1536, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4271/2015-01-1536.
- Ashton, N. and Revell, A. , “Comparison of RANS and DES Methods for the DrivAer Automotive Body,” SAE Technical Paper 2015-01-1538, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4271/2015-01-1538.
- Soares, R. and de Souza, F. , "Influence of CFD Setup and Brief Analysis of Flow Over a 3D Realistic Car Model," SAE Technical Paper 2015-36-0513, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4271/2015-36-0513.
- Carrigan, T., Landon, M., and Pita, C. , “Meshing Considerations for Automotive Shape Design Optimization,” SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-1389, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-1389.
- Jakirlic, S., Kutej, L., Hanssmann, D., Basara, B. et al. , “Eddy-resolving Simulations of the Notchback ‘DrivAer’ Model: Influence of Underbody Geometry and Wheels Rotation on Aerodynamic Behaviour,” SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-1602, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-1602.
- Soares, R., Garry, K., and Holt, J. , “Comparison of the Far-Field Aerodynamic Wake Development for Three DrivAer Model Configurations using a Cost-Effective RANS Simulation,” SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-1514, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4271/2017-01-1514.
- Simmonds, N., Pitman, J., Tsoutsanis, P., Jenkins, K. et al. , “Complete Body Aerodynamic Study of three Vehicles,” SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-1529, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4271/2017-01-1529.
- Yu, X., Jia, Q., Bao, D., and Yang, Z. , “A Comparative Study of Different Wheel Rotating Simulation Methods in Automotive Aerodynamics,” SAE Technical Paper 2018-01-0728, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-01-0728.
- Ekman, P., Larsson, T., Virdung, T., and Karlsson, M. , “Accuracy and Speed for Scale-Resolving Simulations of the DrivAer Reference Model,” SAE Technical Paper 2019-01-0639, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-01-0639.
- Guilmineau, E. , “Numerical Simulations of Flow Around a Realistic Generic Car Model,” SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars - Mech. Syst. 7(2):646-653, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4271/2014-01-0607.
- John, M., Buga, S., Monti, I., Kuthada, T. et al. , “Experimental and Numerical Study of the DrivAer Model Aerodynamics,” SAE Technical Paper 2018-01-0741, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-01-0741.
- Wieser, D., Lang, H., Nayeri, C., and Paschereit, C. , “Manipulation of the Aerodynamic Behavior of the DrivAer Model with Fluidic Oscillators,” SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars - Mech. Syst. 8(2):687-702, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4271/2015-01-1540.
- Soares, R. and de Souza, F. , “Proposal of an Aerodynamic Concept for Drag Reduction of Fastback Car Models,” SAE Technical Paper 2015-36-0523, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4271/2015-36-0523.
- Yuan, H., Yang, Z., and Li, Q. , “Effects of Installation Environment on Flow around Rear View Mirror,” SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars - Mech. Syst. 10(2):580-590, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4271/2017-01-1517.
- Wittmeier, F. and Kuthada, T. , “Open Grille DrivAer Model - First Results,” SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars - Mech. Syst. 8(1):252-260, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4271/2015-01-1553.
- Kuthada, T., Wittmeier, F., Bock, B., Schoenleber, C. et al. , “The Effects of Cooling Air on the Flow Field around a Vehicle,” SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars - Mech. Syst. 9(2):723-732, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-1603.
- Collin, C., Mack, S., Indinger, T., and Mueller, J. , “A Numerical and Experimental Evaluation of Open Jet Wind Tunnel Interferences using the DrivAer Reference Model,” SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars - Mech. Syst. 9(2):657-679, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-1597.
- Strangfeld, C., Wieser, D., Schmidt, H., Woszidlo, R. et al. , “Experimental Study of Baseline Flow Characteristics for the Realistic Car Model DrivAer,” SAE Technical Paper 2013-01-1251, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4271/2013-01-1251.
- Wieser, D., Schmidt, H., Müller, S., Strangfeld, C. et al. , “Experimental Comparison of the Aerodynamic Behavior of Fastback and Notchback DrivAer Models,” SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars - Mech. Syst. 7(2):682-691, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4271/2014-01-0613.
- James, T., Krueger, L., Lentzen, M., Woodiga, S. et al. , “Development and Initial Testing of a Full-Scale DrivAer Generic Realistic Wind Tunnel Correlation and Calibration Model,” SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars - Mech. Syst. 11(5):353-367, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-01-0731.
- Forbes, D., Page, G., Passmore, M., and Gaylard, A. , “A Fully Coupled, 6 Degree-of-Freedom, Aerodynamic and Vehicle Handling Crosswind Simulation using the DrivAer Model,” SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars - Mech. Syst. 9(2):710-722, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-1601.
- Howell, J., Forbes, D., Passmore, M., and Page, G. , “The Effect of a Sheared Crosswind Flow on Car Aerodynamics,” SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars - Mech. Syst. 10(1):278-285, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4271/2017-01-1536.
- Josefsson, E., Hagvall, R., Urquhart, M., and Sebben, S. , “Numerical Analysis of Aerodynamic Impact on Passenger Vehicles during Cornering,” SAE Technical Paper 2018-37-0014, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-37-0014.
- Stoll, D. and Wiedemann, J. , “Active Crosswind Generation and Its Effect on the Unsteady Aerodynamic Vehicle Properties Determined in an Open Jet Wind Tunnel,” SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars - Mech. Syst. 11(5):429-446, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-01-0722.
- Soares, R., Knowles, A., Goñalons Olives, S., Garry, K. et al. , “On the Aerodynamics of an Enclosed-Wheel Racing Car: An Assessment and Proposal of Add-On Devices for a Fourth, High-Performance Configuration of the DrivAer Model,” SAE Technical Paper 2018-01-0725, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-01-0725.
- Zhang, C., Tanneberger, M., Kuthada, T., Wittmeier, F. et al. , “Introduction of the AeroSUV-A New Generic SUV Model for Aerodynamic Research,” SAE Technical Paper 2019-01-0646, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-01-0646.
- Lokhande, B., Sovani, S., and Khalighi, B. , “Transient Simulation of the Flow Field Around a Generic Pickup Truck,” SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-1313, 2003, https://doi.org/10.4271/2003-01-1313.
- Al-Garni, A., Bernal, L., and Khalighi, B. , “Experimental Investigation of the Flow Around a Generic SUV,” SAE Technical Paper 2004-01-0228, 2004, https://doi.org/10.4271/2004-01-0228.
- Yang, Z. and Khalighi, B. , “CFD Simulations for Flow Over Pickup Trucks,” SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-0547, 2005, https://doi.org/10.4271/2005-01-0547.
- Yang, Z., Nastov, A., and Schenkel, M. , “Further Assessment of Closed-Wall Wind Tunnel Blockage Using CFD,” SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-0868, 2005, https://doi.org/10.4271/2005-01-0868.
- Khalighi, B. , “Comparison Between the Conventional Body-Fitted and the Lattice Boltzmann CFD Methods for the Flow around a Generic Pickup Truck,” SAE Technical Paper 2008-01-0323, 2008, https://doi.org/10.4271/2008-01-0323.
- Zhu, H. and Yang, Z. , “Simulation of Flow around a Generic Pickup Truck with RSM Model,” SAE Technical Paper 2008-01-0324, 2008, https://doi.org/10.4271/2008-01-0324.
- Mokhtar, W., Britcher, C., and Camp, R. , “Further Analysis of Pickup Trucks Aerodynamics,” SAE Technical Paper 2009-01-1161, 2009, https://doi.org/10.4271/2009-01-1161.
- Holloway, S., Leylek, J., York, W., and Khalighi, B. , “Aerodynamics of a Pickup Truck: Combined CFD and Experimental Study,” SAE Int. J. Commer. Veh. 2(1):88-100, 2009, https://doi.org/10.4271/2009-01-1167.
- Ha, J., Jeong, S., and Obayashi, S. , “Investigation of the Bed and Rear Flap Variation for a Low-Drag Pickup Truck using Design of Experiments,” SAE Technical Paper 2010-01-0122, 2010, https://doi.org/10.4271/2010-01-0122.
- Wang, H., Lin, T., Yuan, X., and Zhang, Q. , “Simulation and Aerodynamic Optimization of Flow Over a Pickup Truck Model,” SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-2437, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4271/2014-01-2437.
- Wiedemann, J. and Potthoff, J. , “The New 5-Belt Road Simulation System of the IVK Wind Tunnels - Design and First Results,” SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-0429, 2003, https://doi.org/10.4271/2003-01-0429.
- Blumrich, R., Widdecke, N., Wiedemann, J., Michelbach, A. et al. , “New FKFS Technology at the Full-Scale Aeroacoustic Wind Tunnel of University of Stuttgart,” SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars - Mech. Syst. 8(1):294-305, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4271/2015-01-1557.
- Larson, L. and Woodiga, S. , “Aerodynamic Investigation of Cooling Drag of a Production Pickup Truck Part 1: Test Results,” SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars - Mech. Syst. 11(5):477-491, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-01-0740.
- Lietz, R., Larson, L., Bachant, P., Goldstein, J. et al. , “An Extensive Validation of an Open Source Based Solution for Automobile External Aerodynamics,” SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-1524, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4271/2017-01-1524.
- Norman, P. and Howard, K. , “Evaluating Statistical Error in Unsteady Automotive Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations,” to be published at SAE-WCX 2020, Detroit, MI.