This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Is the “K Value” of an Engine Truly Fuel Independent?
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
To be published on April 14, 2020 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
The octane appetite of an engine is frequently characterised by the so-called K value. It is usually assumed that K is dependent only on the thermodynamic conditions in the engine when knock occurs. In this work we test this hypothesis: further analysis was conducted on experimental results from SAE 2019-01-0035 in which a matrix of fuels was tested in a single cylinder engine. The fuels consisted of a relatively small number of components, thereby simplifying the analysis of the chemical kinetic proprieties.
Through dividing the original fuel matrix into subsets, it was possible to explore the variation of K value with fuel properties. It was found that K value tends to increase slightly with RON. The explanation for this finding is that higher RON leads to advanced ignition timing (i.e. closer to MBT conditions) and advanced ignition timing results in faster combustion because of the higher pressures and temperatures reached in the thermodynamic trajectory. The Livengood-Wu integral can be employed to show that for higher octane fuels, knock onset occurs at a higher temperature and pressure. Thus, the fuel octane quality can impact the thermodynamic trajectory in the engine.
- Roger Cracknell - Shell Global Solutions (UK)
- Masaharu Kassai - Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.
- Taisuke Shiraishi - Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.
- Andrea Festa - University of Bath
- Sandro Gail - Shell Global Solutions (Deutschland) GmbH
- Allen Aradi - Shell Global Solutions (US)
- Masahiko Shibuya - Shell Lubricants Japan K. K.
CitationCracknell, R., Kassai, M., Shiraishi, T., Festa, A. et al., "Is the “K Value” of an Engine Truly Fuel Independent?," SAE Technical Paper 2020-01-0615, 2020.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 3]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 4]|
- Kalghatgi, G. , “Fuel Anti-Knock Quality - Part I. Engine Studies,” SAE Technical Paper 2001-01-3584, 2001, https://doi.org/10.4271/2001-01-3584.
- Kalghatgi, G. , “Fuel Anti-Knock Quality-Part II. Vehicle Studies - How Relevant Is Motor Octane Number (MON) in Modern Engines?” SAE Technical Paper 2001-01-3585, 2001, https://doi.org/10.4271/2001-01-3585.
- Szybist, J.P. and Splitter, D.A. , “Pressure and Temperature Effects on Fuels with Varying Octane Sensitivity at High Load in SI Engines,” Combustion and Flame 177:49-66, 2017.
- Kalghatgi, G. , “Auto-Ignition Quality of Practical Fuels and Implications for Fuel Requirements of Future SI and HCCI Engines,” SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-0239, 2005, https://doi.org/10.4271/2005-01-0239.
- Remmert, S., Campbell, S., Cracknell, R., Schuetze, A. et al. , “Octane Appetite: The Relevance of a Lower Limit to the MON Specification in a Downsized, Highly Boosted DISI Engine,” SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 7(3):743-755, 2014.
- Orlebar, C., Joedicke, A., and Studzinski, W. , “The Effects of Octane, Sensitivity and K on the Performance and Fuel Economy of a Direct Injection Spark Ignition Vehicle,” SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-1216, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4271/2014-01-1216.
- Davies, T., Cracknell, R., Lovett, G., Cruff, L. et al. , “Fuel Effects in a Boosted DISI Engine,” SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-1985, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4271/2011-01-1985.
- Wang, C., Prakash, A., Aradi, A., Cracknell, R.F., and Xu, H. , “Significance of RON and MON to a Modern DISI Engine,” Fuel 209:172-183, 2017.
- Kassai, M., Aksu, C., Shiraishi, T., Cracknell, R. et al. , “Mechanism Analysis on the Effect of Fuel Properties on Knocking Performance at Boosted Conditions,” SAE Technical Paper 2019-01-0035, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-01-0035.
- Somers, K.P., Cracknell, R.F., and Curran, H.J. , “A Chemical Kinetic Interpretation of the Octane Appetite of Modern Gasoline Engines,” Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2018, doi:10.1016/j.proci.2018.05.123.
- Cracknell, R.F., Prakash, A., Somers, K.P., and Wang, C. , “Impact of Detailed Fuel Chemistry on Knocking Behaviour in Engines,” in Günther, M. and Sens, M. (eds.), in Knocking in Gasoline Engines. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Knocking in Gasoline, Engines, Springer, Berlin, Germany, Dec. 12-13, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69760-4_14.
- Farrell, J., Johnston, R., and Androulakis, I. , “Molecular Structure Effects on Laminar Burning Velocities at Elevated Temperature and Pressure,” SAE Technical Paper 2004-01-2936, 2004, https://doi.org/10.4271/2004-01-2936.
- Goodwin, D.G., Speth, R.L., Moffat, H.K., and Weber, B.W. “Cantera: An Object-Oriented Software Toolkit for Chemical Kinetics, Thermodynamics, and Transport Processes,” https://www.cantera.org, 2018, Version 2.4.0, doi:10.5281/zenodo.1174508.
- ANSYS Chemkin-PRO 12.9 , www.ansys.com/products/fluids/ansys-chemkin-pro.
- Andrae, J.C.G. , “Comprehensive Chemical Kinetic Modeling of Toluene Reference Fuels Oxidation,” Fuel 107:740-748, 2013.
- Livengood, J.C. and Wu, P.C. , “Correlation of Autoignition Phenomena in Internal Combustion Engines and Rapid Compression Machines,” Symp. (Int.) Combust. 5:347-356, 1955.
- Heywood, J.B. , Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals Second Edition (New York: McGraw-Hill), 423.
- Prakash, A., Redmann, J., Giles, K., Cracknell, R. et al. , “Octane Response of a Highly Boosted Direct Injection Spark Ignition Engine at Different Compression Ratios,” SAE Technical Paper 2018-01-0269, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-01-0269.
- Sarathy, S.M., Kukkadapu, G., Mehl, M., Javed, T. et al. , “Compositional Effects on the Ignition of FACE Gasolines,” Combust. Flame 169:171-193, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2016.04.