This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Frequency Domain Analysis of 2-Wheeler Systems
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 14, 2020 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Most automotive companies validate their vehicle designs by running vehicle on the durability proving grounds. Part fractures and collisions between two components are common failures observed during proven ground testing. Laboratory testing and FEA simulation are used to validate designs in the concept stage as it consumes less time and cost as compared to proven ground testing. The lab testing and simulation process both have their own limitations. It is difficult to incorporate effect of multi-direction input loading (x, y, z) with single direction loading in laboratory testing due to restrictions with electrodynamic shaker testing. However, in simulation, multi direction input can be easily incorporated but often actual vehicle measured test track data is not available in the early design stage.
In the present work, Modern methodologies have been employed [ref 1, 2] in frequency domain to validate design in FEA simulation. First, relative random response calculation is performed for calculating the probability of collision between parts of motorcycle rear cowl. Second, multi-channel loading (x, y, z) on the front cowl is used to derive a simple single direction (surrogate) loading which has similar impact in terms of structural response (stress and fatigue). This derived single direction loading can be used efficiently in shaker testing. Third, a standard input load envelope is created in such a way that it includes all set of possible loading scenarios for a motorbike fuel tank assembly. This standard input load can be used at an early stage of design so that it helps in predicting component failure in FEA simulation.
CitationSethi, M., Sharma, A., Khare, S., Bishop, N. et al., "Frequency Domain Analysis of 2-Wheeler Systems," SAE Technical Paper 2020-01-0476, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4271/2020-01-0476.
- Bishop , N. , Murthy , P. , Sweitzer , K. , and Kerr , S. Time vs Frequency Domain Analysis for Large Automotive Systems SAE Technical Paper 2015-01-0535 2015 https://doi.org/10.4271/2015-01-0535
- Thesing , T. and Bishop , N. Modern Methods for Random Fatigue of Automotive Parts SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-0372 2016 https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-0372
- Bishop , N. and Sherratt , F. Fatigue Life Prediction from Power Spectral Density Data. Part 1, Traditional Approaches and Part 2, Recent Developments Env. Eng 2 1989
- Bishop , N.W.M. and Sherratt , F. Finite Element Based Fatigue Calculations NAFEMS 2000
- Bishop , N. , Murthy , P. , and Sweitzer , K. Advances Relating to Fatigue Calculations for Combined Random and Deterministic Loads 13th International ASTM/ESIS Symposium on Fatigue and Fracture Mechanics (39th National Symposium on Fatigue and Fracture Mechanics) Jacksonville Nov 13-15, 2013
- Sethi , M. , Sharma , A. , Khare , S. , Bishop , N. , and Kolar , H.
- Kerr , S. , Bishop , N. , Datta , S.
- Datta , S. , Bishop , N. , Sweitzer , K. , and Atkins , A. Simultaneous Durability Assessment and Relative Random Analysis Under Base Shake Loading Conditions SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-0339 2017 https://doi.org/10.4271/2017-01-0339
- Udayakumar , G. , Moolam , R. , Bishop , N. , and Murthy , P. Creating Accurate Surrogate and/or Accelerated Loads for Known Models or Structural Systems Types NAFEMS World Congress 2017, NWC17-758
- Bishop , N. , Kerr , S. , Murthy , P. , and Sweitzer , K. Advances Relating to Fatigue Calculations for Combined Random and Deterministic Loads SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-0725 2014 https://doi.org/10.4271/2014-01-0725
- Ferreira , W. , Meehan , T. , Cardoso , V. , and Bishop , N. A Comparative Study of Automotive System Fatigue Models Processed in the Time and Frequency Domain SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-0377 2016 https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-0377