This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Fuel Property Effects on Spray Atomization Process in Gasoline Direct Injection
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 14, 2020 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
This paper presents a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) study of the Engine Combustion Network (ECN) Spray G under non-vaporizing condition, focusing on the impacts of fuel properties as well as realistic geometry on the atomization process. The large-eddy-simulation method, coupled with the volume-of-fluid method, is used to model the high-speed turbulent two-phase flow. A moving-needle boundary condition is applied to capture the internal flow boundary condition accurately. The injector geometry was measured with micron-level resolution using x-ray tomographic imaging at the Advanced Photon Source at Argonne National Laboratory, providing detailed machining tolerance and defects from manufacturing and a realistic rough surface. A 2.5-μm fine mesh is used to sufficiently resolve the details of liquid-gas interface and the breakup process. The fuel properties, i.e., density, dynamic viscosity and surface tension, are investigated by comparing three fuels, iso-octane, ethanol and E30 (70% iso-octane and 30% ethanol blend by volume) in the spray simulation. It is shown that the iso-octane spray has 12% higher injection velocity and 5% lower mass flow rate at hole exit compared to ethanol due to fuel effects. Detailed analysis of spray morphology, detached ratio and SMD shows that the fuel property effects are insignificant at this cold condition, while the impacts of in-nozzle geometry details as reported in previous study are applicable to different fuels and are generally more profound compared to the fuel impacts.
CitationYue, Z. and Som, S., "Fuel Property Effects on Spray Atomization Process in Gasoline Direct Injection," SAE Technical Paper 2020-01-0329, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4271/2020-01-0329.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
- Zhao, F., Lai, M.C., and Harrington, D.L. , “Automotive Spark-ignited Direct-injection Gasoline Engines,” Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 25(5):437-562, 1999.
- Gaspar, D.J. , “Top Ten Blendstocks For Turbocharged Gasoline Engines: Bioblendstocks With Potential to Deliver the for Highest Engine Efficiency,” Report No. PNNL-28713, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, 2019.
- Matsumoto, A., Moore, W., Lai, M., Zheng, Y. et al. , “Spray Characterization of Ethanol Gasoline Blends and Comparison to a CFD Model for a Gasoline Direct Injector,” SAE Int. J. Engines 3(1):402-425, 2010, https://doi.org/10.4271/2010-01-0601.
- Huang, Y., Huang, S., Huang, R., and Hong, G. , “Spray and Evaporation Characteristics of Ethanol and Gasoline Direct Injection in Non-Evaporating, Transition and Flash-Boiling Conditions,” Energ. Convers. Manage. 108:68-77, 2016.
- Manin, J., Jung, Y., Skeen, S.A., Pickett, L.M. et al. , “Experimental Characterization of DI Gasoline Injection Processes,” SAE Technical Paper 2015-01-1894, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4271/2015-01-1894.
- Duke, D.J., Swantek, A.B., Sovis, N.M., Tilocco, F.Z. et al. , “Time-Resolved X-ray Tomography of Gasoline Direct Injection Sprays,” SAE Int. J. Engines 9:143-153, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4271/2015-01-1873.
- Duke, D.J., Kastengren, A.L., Matusik, K.E., Swantek, A.B. et al. , “Internal and Near Nozzle Measurements of Engine Combustion Network “Spray G” Gasoline Direct Injectors,” Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 88:608-621, 2017.
- Matusik, K.E., Duke, D.J., Sovis, N., Swantek, A.B. et al. , “A Study on the Relationship Between Internal Nozzle Geometry and Injected Mass Distribution of Eight ECN Spray G Nozzles,” in ILASS 2017, Valencia, Spain, September 2017.
- Yue, Z., Battistoni, M., and Som, S. , “A Numerical Study on Spray Characteristics at Start of Injection for Gasoline Direct Injection,” in 14th Triennial International Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems, Chicago, IL, July 22-26, 2018.
- Yue, Z., Battistoni, M., and Som, S. , “Spray Characterization for Engine Combustion Network Spray G Injector Using High-Fidelity Simulation with Detailed Injector Geometry,” Int. J. Eng. Res. 21(1):226-238, 2020.
- Hirt, C.W. and Nichols, B.D. , “Volume of Fluid (VOF) Method for the Dynamics of Free Boundaries,” J. Comput. Phys. 39(1):201-225, 1981.
- Richards, K.J., Senecal, P.K., and Pomraning, E. , “CONVERGE v2.3 Documentation,” Convergent Sciences Inc., 2016.
- Brackbill, J.U., Kothe, D.B., and Zemach, C. , “A Continuum Method for Modeling Surface Tension,” J. Comput. Phys. 100(2):335-354, 1992.
- Rider, W.J. and Kothe, D.B. , “Reconstructing Volume Tracking,” J. Comp. Phys. 141(2):112-152, 1998.
- Pomraning, E. and Rutland, C.J. , “Dynamic One-Equation Non-viscosity Large-Eddy Simulation Model,” AIAA Journal 40(4):689-701, 2002.
- Rutland, C.J. , “Large-Eddy Simulations for Internal Combustion Engines - A Review,” Int. J. Eng. Res. 12(5):421-451, 2011.
- Werner, H. and Wengle, H. , “Large Eddy Simulation of Turbulent Flow Over and Around a Cube in a Plane Channel,” Turbulent Shear Flows 8:155-168, 1993.
- Issa, R.I. , “Solution of the Implicitly Discretised Fluid Flow Equations by Operator-Splitting,” J. Comput. Phys. 62(1):40-65, 1986.
- Yaws, C.L. , Thermophysical Properties of Chemicals and Hydrocarbons (William Andrew Publishing, 2009).
- Yaws, C.L. , Transport Properties of Chemicals and Hydrocarbons (William Andrew Publishing, 2009).
- Morávková, L., Wagner, Z., Sedláková, Z., and Linek, J. , “Volumetric Behaviour of Binary and Ternary Liquid Systems Composed of Ethanol, Isooctane, and Toluene at Temperatures from (298.15 to 328.15) K. Experimental Data and Correlation,” J. Chem. Thermodyn. 43(12):1906-1916, 2011.
- Grunberg, L. and Nissan, A.H. , “Mixture Law for Viscosity,” Nature 164:799-800, 1949.
- Isdale, J.D., MacGillivray, J.C., and Cartwright, G. , “Prediction of Viscosity of Organic Liquid Mixtures by a Group Contribution Method,” Natl. Eng. Lab. Rept., East Kilbride, Glasgow, Scotland, 1985.
- Zuo, Y.-X. and Stenby, E.H. , “Corresponding-States and Parachor Models for the Calculation of Interfacial Tensions,” Can. J. Chem. Eng. 75(6):1130-1137, 2009.
- Leibovici, C.F. , “A Consistent Procedure for the Estimation of Properties Associated to Lumped Systems,” Fluid Ph. Equilibria 87(2):189-197, 1993.
- Soave, G. , “Equilibrium Constants from a Modified Redlich-Kwong Equation of State,” Chem. Eng. Sci. 27(6):1197-1203, 1972.