This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Balancing Lifecycle Sustainment Cost with Value of Information during Design Phase
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
To be published on April 14, 2020 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
The complete lifecycle of complex systems, such as ground vehicles, consists of multiple phases including design, manufacturing, operation and sustainment (O&S) and finally disposal. For many systems, the majority of the lifecycle costs are incurred during the operation and sustainment phase, specifically in the form of uncertain maintenance costs. Testing and analysis during the design phase, including reliability and supportability analysis, can have a major influence on costs during the O&S phase. However, the cost of the analysis itself must be reconciled with the expected benefits of the reduction in uncertainty. In this paper, we quantify the value of performing the tests and analyses in the design phase by treating it as imperfect information obtained to better estimate uncertain maintenance costs. A multi-attribute decision framework for military ground vehicles acquisition is employed to illustrate the methodology and the value of performing the analysis early in the system’s lifecycle. Attributes considered are maintenance cost and operational availability, while the utility is calculated for a risk averse decision maker. Numerical methods are employed to calculate the value of sample information and reflect an increase in expected utility (EU) after collecting the information. While less than the value of perfect information that completely eliminates outcome uncertainty, results demonstrate a positive value for testing. This value determines the maximum amount that should be spent on testing given the anticipated benefits.
CitationKassoumeh, S., Majcher, M., Ealy, J., Gorsich, D. et al., "Balancing Lifecycle Sustainment Cost with Value of Information during Design Phase," SAE Technical Paper 2020-01-0176, 2020.
- Department of Defense , “Operating and Support Cost Management Guidebook,” 2/2016, page 6.
- Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 5000.02 , “Operation of the Defense Acquisition System,” 11/2013, page 9.
- Slater, R.C. and Cloutier, R.J. , Towards Early Lifecycle Prediction of System Reliability (Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC), 2019).
- Valerdi, R. , The Constructive Systems Engineering Cost Model (COSYSMO) (University of Southern California, 2005).
- Boehm, B., Abts, C., Brown, A.W., Chulani, S. et al. , Cost Estimation with COCOMO II (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 2000).
- Honour, E.C. , “6.2. 3 Understanding the Value of Systems Engineering,” INCOSE International Symposium 14(1):1207-1222, 2004.
- Gallasch, G.E. , “Models and Tools for the Cost/Benefit Analysis of Condition Based Maintenance,” in AIAC16 Sixteenth Australian International Aerospace Congress, 2015, Report no. DSTO-TR-2992.
- Fisher, K. , “ENM 590 Case Studies in Engineering Management Condition Based Maintenance Plus Return on Investment Analysis,” US Army RDECOM TARDEC, 01/2011.
- Keeney, R.L. and Raiffa, H. , Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs (Cambridge: United Kingdom, Cambridge University Press, 1994).
- Von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O. , “Theory of Games and Economic Behavior,” Bull. Amer. Math. Soc 51(7):498-504, 1945.
- Nikolaidis, E., Mourelatos, Z., and Pandey, V. , Design Decisions under Uncertainty with Limited Information (Taylor and Francis, 2011), 540.
- Strong, M., Oakley, J.E., Brennan, A., and Breeze, P. , “Estimating the Expected Value of Sample Information Using the Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis Sample: A Fast, Nonparametric Regression-Based Method,” Medical Decision Making: An International Journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making 35(5):570-583, 2015, doi:10.1177/0272989X15575286.
- Gill, J. , Bayesian Methods: A Social and Behavioral Sciences Approach (Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2014).
- Ades, A.E., Lu, G., and Claxton, K. , “Expected Value of Sample Information Calculations in Medical Decision Modeling,” Medical Decision Making 24(2):207-227, 2004.
- Kassoumeh, S. , “Value of Information in Engineering Decision Making with Applications in Autonomy,” PhD diss., Oakland University, 2018.