This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Perceptions of Two Unique Lane Centering Systems: An FOT Interview Analysis
Technical Paper
2020-01-0108
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
This content contains downloadable datasets
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
The goal of this interview analysis was to explore and document the perceptions of two unique lane centering systems (S90’s Pilot Assist and CT6’s Super Cruise). Both systems offer a similar type of functionality (adaptive cruise control and lane centering), but have significantly different design philosophies and HMI (Human-Machine Interface) implementations. Twenty-four drivers drove one of the two vehicle models for a month as part of a field operational test (FOT) study. Upon vehicle return, drivers took part in a 60-minute semi-structured interview covering their perceptions of the vehicle’s various advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS). Transcripts of the interviews were coded by two researchers, who tagged each statement with relevant system and perception code labels. For analysis, the perception codes were grouped into larger thematic bins of safety, comfort, driver attention, and system performance. Perceptions of adaptive cruise control (ACC) were similar across vehicles. Almost all participants mentioned benefits of comfort and safety associated with ACC use. Participants cited different benefits between the two vehicle’s implementations of lane centering. A majority of participants (75%) described comfort benefits associated with Super Cruise, while less than half (41%) cited comfort benefits associated with Pilot Assist. Only a few participants (25%) mentioned safety benefits associated with Super Cruise. Half (50%) of the participants mentioned safety benefits associated with Pilot Assist. Almost all participants cited fears of potential misuse of the system in which drivers might pay less attention to the driving task. Results suggest that drivers’ comprehension and expectation of these systems’ behavior are strongly influenced by their design philosophies, specifically in terms of the difference in hands-on versus hands-off-wheel implementation. The perceived role of the driver – as either a fallback driver or as an assisted driver - may be influenced by the design implementation.
Authors
- Steven Landry - Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- Bobbie Seppelt - Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- Luca Russo - Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- Bruce Mehler - Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- Linda Angell - Touchstone Evaluations Inc
- Pnina Gershon - Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- Bryan Reimer - Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Topic
Citation
Landry, S., Seppelt, B., Russo, L., Mehler, B. et al., "Perceptions of Two Unique Lane Centering Systems: An FOT Interview Analysis," SAE Technical Paper 2020-01-0108, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4271/2020-01-0108.Data Sets - Support Documents
| Title | Description | Download |
|---|---|---|
| Unnamed Dataset 1 | ||
| Unnamed Dataset 2 | ||
| Unnamed Dataset 3 | ||
| Unnamed Dataset 4 | ||
| Unnamed Dataset 5 | ||
| Unnamed Dataset 6 |
Also In
References
- Favarò , F.M. , Nader , N. , Eurich , S.O. , Tripp , M. , and Varadaraju , N. Examining Accident Reports Involving Autonomous Vehicles in California PLoS One 12 9 e0184952 2017
- Kyriakidis , M. , de Winter , J.C.F. , Stanton , N. , Bellet , T. , van Arem , B. , Brookhuis , K. , Martens , M.H. et al. A Human Factors Perspective on Automated Driving Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 20 3 2019 223 249
- Seppelt , B. , Reimer , B. , Russo , L. , Mehler , B. , Fisher , J. , and Friedman , D. September 2018
- Kyriakidis , M. , de Winter , J. , Stanton , N. , Bellet , T. et al. 2019 A Human Factors Perspective on Automated Driving Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 10.1080/1463922X.2017.1293187
- SAE Standard J3016 2016
- Fridman , L. , Brown , D.E. , Glazer , M. , Angell , W. et al. MIT Advanced Vehicle Technology Study: Large-Scale Naturalistic Driving Study of Driver Behavior and Interaction with Automation IEEE Access 7 102021 102038 2019
- Abraham , H. , Reimer , B. , and Mehler , B. Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS): A Consideration of Driver Perceptions on Training, Usage & Implementation Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 61 1 1954 1958 2017
- Beggiato , M. and Krems , J.F. The Evolution of Mental Model, Trust and Acceptance of Adaptive Cruise Control in Relation to Initial Information Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 18 47 57 2013
- Kolodge , K. and Boor , L. August 2019
- Consumer Reports November 2018 https://data.consumerreports.org/autos/reliability/reports/partially-automated-driving-systems.pdf
- Ritchie , J. and Spencer , L. Qualitative Data Analysis for Applied Policy Research Analyzing Qualitative Data Routledge 2002 187 208
- Abraham , H. , Seppelt , B. , Mehler , B. , and Reimer , B. What’s in a Name: Vehicle Technology Branding & Consumer Expectations for Automation Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications 226 234 2017
- Mulder , M. , and Abbink , D.A. Correct and Faulty Driver Support from Shared Haptic Control during Evasive Maneuvers 2011 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 1057 1062 IEEE 2011
- Sheridan , T.B. Function Allocation: Algorithm, Alchemy or Apostasy? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 52 2 203 216 2000
- Flemisch , F.O. et al. Towards Cooperative Guidance and Control of Highly Automated Vehicles: H-Mode and Conduct-by-Wire Ergonomics 57 3 343 360 2014
- Denton , T. Automated Driving and Driver Assistance Systems London Routledge 2020 https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429293856