This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
A discussion on algorithms for health monitoring, fault prognosis and RUL prediction of aerospace and automotive equipment
Technical Paper
2019-36-0264
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
This content contains downloadable datasets
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
Companies are gradually developing: 1) complex and/or highly integrated systems including vehicles (as satellites, airplanes, cars, etc.) or equipment (as computers, cell phones, no breaks, etc.) to use under 2) increasingly varied or inhospitable environments, and to survive under 3) increasingly long life cycles and unavoidable changes in staff & facilities & technologies. The overall decision to use (by time, cost, quality, of functions, services, etc.) such end systems under 2 require 4) high Dependability (Reliability, Maintainability, Availability, Correction, Safety, Security, etc.) of them. The overall survival in use (by health monitoring, housekeeping, retrofit, upgrade, etc.) of such end systems under 3 require 5) high Suportability (Maintainability, Adaptability, Availability, Robustness, etc.) of them coupled with the support systems. To meet the requirements and expectations 4 and 5, there is a need to even treat a growing number of faults, arising from 1, 2 and 3 in components, equipment, subsystems or systems used. In particular, health monitoring, fault prognosis and Remaining Useful Life (RUL) prediction have been used to reach 4 and 5 and treat faults in a priori but informed manner. Currently, electromechanical and electrochemical equipment are among the faultiest ones in aerospace and automotive systems. The faults of these equipment can cause decreased performance, operational damage and/or even failures, especially in space systems, since these hardly allow maintenance. So: This paper presents a discussion on algorithms for health monitoring, fault prognosis and RUL prediction of aerospace and automotive equipment. To do that, it: 1) reviews the available literature for health monitoring, fault prognosis and RUL prediction; selects their usual repertoire of faults; 3) highlights some algorithms to treat them; 4) discuss their pros and cons; 5) comment on some cases of electromechanical and electrochemical equipment reported in the available literature. Based on all of this, we expect to show: 1) the adequacy, difficulties and uncertainties in testing and validating such algorithms; and 2) the benefits of health monitoring, fault prognosis and RUL prediction of aerospace and automotive equipment for: a) analysis and anticipation of faults; b) improved dependability, supportability of the respective systems and of the overall decision to use and survival in use of them; c) assistance in sustainable mobility.
Recommended Content
Authors
Citation
Cássia Ferreira Porto, R. and Oliveira e Souza, M., "A discussion on algorithms for health monitoring, fault prognosis and RUL prediction of aerospace and automotive equipment," SAE Technical Paper 2019-36-0264, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-36-0264.Data Sets - Support Documents
Title | Description | Download |
---|---|---|
Unnamed Dataset 1 |
Also In
References
- Prisacaru , A. , Gromala , P.J. , Jeronimo , M.B. et al. Prognostics and Health Monitoring of Electronic Systems: A Review 2017 18th International Conference on Thermal, Mechanical and Multi-Physics Simulation and Experiments in Microelectronics and Microsystems 2017 10.1109/EuroSimE.2017.7926248
- Amor-Segan , M. , Jones , R. P. A Framework for Health Monitoring of Automotive Electrical and Electronic Control Systems IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference (VNC) 2011 10.1109/VNC.2011.6117140
- Souza , M.L.O. , Carvalho , T. R. The Fault Avoidance and The Fault Tolerance Approaches for Increasing the Reliability of Aerospace and Automotive Systems SAE Technical Paper 2005. 1. 328 2005 10.1.1.469.4282
- Souza , M. L. O. , Porto , R. C. F. , The Fault Correction and the Fault Prediction Approaches for Increasing the Reliability of Aerospace and Automotive Systems SAE Technical Paper 2016-36-0503 2016 10.4271/2016-36-0503
- Roemer , M. J. , Nwadiogbu , E. O. , Bloor , G. Development of Diagnostic and Prognostic Technologies for Aerospace Health Management Applications IEEE Proceedings of Aerospace Conference 2001 10.1109/AERO.2001.931331
- Teubert C. , Daigle M. J. , Sankararaman , S. , Goebel , K. , Watkins , J. A Generic Software Architecture for Prognostics. International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management 2017
- 2017
- Saxena , A. , J. Celaya , E. Balaban , K. Goebel , B. Saha , S. Saha , and M. Schwabacher , Metrics for Evaluating Performance of Prognostic Techniques International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management 2008 1 17 2008 https://doi.org/10.1109/PHM.2008.4711436
- Saxena , A. , Celaya , J. Sah , B. Saha , S. and Goebel , K. Metrics for Offline Evaluation of Prognostic Performance International Journal of Prognostics and health Management 1 1 20 2010
- Isermann , R. Fault diagnosis systems: An Introduction from Fault Detection to Fault Tolerance Heidelberg, Germany Springer 2006
- Leite , A. C. Detecção e diagnóstico de falhas em sensores e atuadore s da plataforma multi-missão 374 Dissertação (Mestrado em Engenharia e Tecnologias Espaciais) - Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE São José dos Campos 2007
- Villemeur , A. Reliability, availability, maintainability and safety assessment: methods and techniques New York: Wiley 1992 398 978-0-471-93048-8
- European Cooperation For Space Standardization (Ecss) 2009 74
- European Cooperation For Space Standardization (ECSS) ECSS-Q-ST-30C: space product assurance – Dependability 2009 54 10.4271/2015-01-2584
- Simeón , E. J.A. , Prognóstico de falhas baseado em redes neurais com estados de ECO 2015 145 Doutorado em Sistemas Mecatrônicos Departamento de Engenharia Mecânica) Faculdade de Tecnologia Universidade de Brasília Brasília 2015
- Vachtsevanos , G. ; Lewis , F. Roemer , M. ; Hess , A. ; Wu , B. Intelligent Fault Diagnosis and Prognosis for Engineering Systems New Jersey John Wiley and Sons 2006
- Bui , T. H. Prognostic algorithm development for plant monitoring and maintenance planning 2015 211
- Sutharssan , T. ; Montalvão , D. ; Chen , Y.K. ; et al A review on prognostics and health monitoring of proton Exchange membrane fuel cell Journal Elsevier 75 440 450 10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.009 2017
- Wei , Y. , et al A review of data-driven approaches for prediction and classification ofbuilding energy consumption Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 82 2018 1027 1047 10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.108. 2018
- Porto , R. C. F. Souza . M. L. O , A discussion on fault prognosis/prediction and health monitoring techniques to improve the reliability of aerospace and automotive systems SAE Technical Paper 2018-36-0316 2018 https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-36-0316
- Saxena , A. , S , Sankararaman , and K. Goebel , Performance Evaluation for Fleet and Unit-based Prediction Methods Second European Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society Nantes, France 8 10 2014
- Johnson , S. B. , Gormley , T. , Kessler , S. , Mott , C. , PattersonHine , A. , Reichard , K. , & Scandura Jr , P. 2011 System health management: with aerospace applications John Wiley & Sons
- Wald , R. et al. A review of prognostics and health monitoring techniques for autonomous ocean systems International Issat on Reliability and Quality Design 2010 6
- Shunfeng Cheng , Michael Azarian , and Michael Pecht Sensor system selection for prognostics and health monitoring ASME 2008 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference 1383 1389 American Society of Mechanical Engineers 10.1115/DETC2008-49907
- Bosh GmbH , https://www.bosch-mobility-solutions.com/en/products-and-services/passenger-cars-and-light-commercial-vehicles/driver-assistance-systems/predictive-emergency-braking-system/
- Bosh GmbH , https://www.bosch-mobility-solutions.com/en/products-and-services/passenger-cars-and-light-commercial-vehicles/driver-assistance-systems/predictive-emergency-braking-system/mid-range-radar-sensor-(mrr)/
- Thorat , S. , Thorve , S. , Upase , J. , Dhupar , A. S. , Design and Implementation of Automatic Emergency Braking System International Journal of Current Engineering and Technology 2016 337 342 10.14741/Ijcet/22774106/spl.4.2016.67
- https://standexelectronics.com/automotive-market-applications-transportation-industry/
- Arachchige , B. ; Perinpanayagam , S. ; Jaras , R. Enhanced Prognostic Model for Lithium Ion Batteries Based on Particle Filter State Transition Model Modification Applied Sciences. 7 11 1172 2017 10.3390/app7111172
- Lee , J. , Wu , F. , Zhao , W. , Ghaffari , M. , Liao , L. , Siegel , D. Prognostics and health management design for rotary machinery systems—Reviews, methodology and applications Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 42 1–2 314 334 2014
- Morando , S. , Jemei , S. , Gouriveau , R. , Zerhouni , N. , Hissel , D. Fuel Cells prognostics using echo state network Industrial Electronics Society, IECON 2013 - 39th Annual Conference of the IEEE 1 1 1632 1637 2013
- Xiangjun , D. e Tongmin , Reliability prediction based on degradation measure distribution and wavelet neural network Prognostics and System Health Management (PHM), IEEE Conference on 1 1 1 5 2012
- Daroogheh , N. , Meskin , N. , Khorasani , K. A novel particle filter parameter prediction scheme for failure prognosis American Control Conference 1 1 1735 1742 2014
- Weiming , W. , Bing , L. , Min , L. e Houjun , W. Prognostics of Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on the Verhulst Model, Particle Swarm Optimization and Particle Filter Instrumentation and Measurement, IEEE Transactions on 63 1 2 17 2014
- Dickerson , A. , Rajamani , R. , Boost , M. , and Jackson , J. , Determining Remaining Useful Life for Li-ion Batteries SAE Technical Paper 2015-01-2584 2015 5
- Saha , B. , Goebel , K. , Christophersen , J. , Comparison of Prognostic Algorithms for Estimating Remaining Useful Life of Batteries Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control 31 3 2009 10.1177/0142331208092030
- Mosallam , A. , Medjaher , K. , Zerhouni , N. Bayesian approach for remaining useful life prediction Chemical Engineering Transactions 33 1 139 144 2013
- Laslett , O.W. , Mills , A.R. , Zaidan , M.A. e Harrison , R.F. Fusing an ensemble of diverse prognostic life predictions Aerospace Conference, 2014 IEEE 1 1 1 10 2014
- Chang-Yu , W. , Tsair-Fwu , L. , Chun-Hsiung , F. e Jyh-Horng , C. Fuzzy Logic-Based Prognostic Score for Outcome Prediction in Esophageal Cancer Information Technology in Biomedicine, IEEE Transactions on 16 6 1224 1230 2012
- Soualhi , A , Medjaher , K . , Zerhouni , N Bearing Health Monitoring Based on Hilbert--Huang Transform, Support Vector Machine, and Regression Instrumentation and Measurement, IEEE Transactions on 1 99 1 10 2014
- Li , X. , Qian , J. , Wang , G. Fault prognostic based on hybrid method of state judgment and regression Advances in Mechanical Engineering 149 1 1 10 2013
- Sankavaram , C. et al. Model-based and Data-driven Prognosis of Automotive and Electronic Systems 5th Annual IEEE Conference on Automation Science and Engineerin. Proceeding Bangalore, India August 22-25 2009 10.1109/COASE.2009.5234108
- Saha , B. , Goebel , K. , Christophersen , J. 2009 Comparison of prognostic algorithms for estimating remaining useful life of batteries Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control 31 3–4 293 308 10.1177/0142331208092030
- Omariba , Z. , Zhang , L. , Sun , D Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Electric Vehicle Lithium-Ion Battery Based on Particle Filter Method 2018 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Big Data Analysis (ICBDA) 10.1109/ICBDA.2018.8367718
- 35Saxena , A. , Celaya , J. R. , Roychoudhury , I. , Saha , S. , Saha , B. & Goebel , K. 2012 Designing data-driven battery prognostic approaches for variable loading profiles: Some lessons learned European Conference of Prognostics and Health Management Society 72 732
- Goebel , K. , Saha , B. , Saxena , A. A Comparison of Three Data-driven Techniques for Prognostics Paper presented at the MFPT 2008
- Saha , B. , Goebel , K. , Christophersen , J Comparison of Prognostic Algorithms for Estimating Remaining Useful Life of Batteries Transactions of the Royal UK Institute on Measurement &Control (special issue on Intelligent Fault Diagnosis & Prognosis for Engineering Systems) 293 308