This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Digital Twins for Prognostic Profiling
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published November 21, 2019 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
Event: NuGen Summit
Ability to have least failures in products on the field with minimum effort from the manufacturers is a major area of focus driven by Industry 4.0 initiatives. Amidst traditional methods of performing system/subsystem level tests often does not enable the complete coverage of a machine health performance predictions. This paper highlights a workable workflow that could be used as a template while considering system design especially employing Digital Twins that help in mimicking real-life scenarios early in the design cycle to increase product’s reliability as well as tend to near zero defects.
With currently available disruptive technologies, systems integrated multi-domain 'mechatronics' systems operating in closed-loop/close-interaction. This poses great challenge to system health monitoring as failure of any component can trigger catastrophic system failures. It may be the reason that component failures, as per some aerospace reports, are found to be major contributing factors to aircraft loss-of-control. Essentially, it is either too expensive or impossible to monitor every component or subsystem of a complex machine and the current state of the Integrated Health Monitoring Systems seem to be quite inadequate. In this paper, we propose an approach that combines the best of the diagnostics and feature extraction techniques coupled with Artificial Intelligence as a solution to address the challenges of Prognostics Health Management (PHM) for complex systems. The paper also documents a standard procedure to apply the right technologies/tools at every stage so that a clear process can be applied for any similar complex system across the product development life cycle.
In this paper we derive the health status of subsystems by looking at system level responses . Distinguishing features are derived from the overall system level response through feature extraction methodologies and then fed into decision making frameworks that are implemented using both Convolutional Neural Networks [7, 18, 19], Machine Learning  and Deep Learning. Models are trained with distinguishable features through system simulations . Employing rightly designed ML models provide the ability of classifying the failure modes as well as to analyze system faults/responses. Predictive modelling techniques are applied to the ML processed data to deliver useful prognostics on the criticality of the failure mode, RUL of the components/subsystems while system is in operation can be determined. The proposed concept can be easily adapted to various systems from varying domains . The methodology evolved in this work can be easily extended for various use cases for instance in the Transportation domain the user can get alerts not only of failures ahead of time but also the remaining useful lifer as well as possible causes of such a failure. This would let prevent downtime of the overall vehicle/fleet and thereby ensures smooth operation of the entire service.
As a case study, the present work demonstrates the a DPHM solution applied to electrical energy generator where failure mode effects of subsystems and their effect on the overall system performance are studied using Modeling and Simulation techniques. The overall work would finally lead in demonstrating a working recommendation/advisory system that understand the behavior as if it was a pure Digital Twin  and thereby giving a quick turn around for different use cases like study/analysis/what if/predict behavior under various operating conditions with a high level of confidence before the changes are tried on a real system.
CitationThukaram, P. and Mohan, S., "Digital Twins for Prognostic Profiling," SAE Technical Paper 2019-28-2456, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-28-2456.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|Unnamed Dataset 1|
- Vachtsevanos , F.L. , Lewis , M. , Roemer , A.H. , and Wu , B. IntelligentFaultDiagnosis and Prognosis for Engineering Systems Wiley 2006
- Hu , H. , An , M. , Qin , G. , and Hu , N. Study on Fault Diagnosis and Prognosis Methods Based on Hidden Semi-Markov Model ActaArmamentarii 30 1 69 75 2009
- Adams , D.E. and Nataraju , M. A Nonlinear Dynamical Systems Framework for Structural Diagnosis and Prognosis International Journal of Engineering Science 40 17 1919 1941 2002 10.1016/S0020-7225(02)00112-X
- Konrad , H. and Isermann , R. 1996 Diagnosis of Different Faults in Milling Using Drive Signals and Process Models Proceedings of the 13th World Congress, International Federation of Automatic Control 91 6
- Fausett , L. Fundamentals of Neural Networks Architectures, Algorithms, and Applications Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall 1994
- Jones , M.T. AI application programming 2nd Hingham, MA Charles River Media Inc. 2005
- Jorand , M.I. and Bishop , C.M. 1996
- Hornik , K.M. , Stinchcombe , M. , and White , H. Multilayer Feedforward, Networks Are Universal Approximators Neural Networks 2 359 366 1989 10.1016/0893-6080(89)90020-8
- Krogh , A. and Vedelsby , J. Neural Network Ensembles, Cross Validation, and Active Learning Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 7 231 238 1995
- Yao , X. and Liu , Y. A New Evolutionary System for Evolving Artificial Neural Networks IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 8 694 713 1997 10.1109/72.572107
- Sonoda , S. and Murata , N. 2013 http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.6461
- Bunks , C. , McCarthy , D. , and Al-Ani , T. Condition-Based Maintenance of Machines Using Hidden Markov Models Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 14 4 597 612 July 2000
- Oraby , S.E. , Al-Modhuf , A.F. , and Hayhurst , D.R. A Diagnostic Approach for Turning Tool Based on the Dynamic Force Signals Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering 127 3 463 475 2005
- Lan , Z. , Gujrati , P. , Li , Y. , Zheng , Z. , Thakur , R. , and White , J. A Fault Diagnosis and Prognosis Service for TeraGrid Clusters TeraGrid Conference Maidison 2007
- Kriese , D. 2005 http://www.dkriesel.com/_media/science/neuronalenetze-en-zeta2-2col-dkrieselcom.pdf
- Lecture Series on Neural Networks http://www.cse.unr.edu/~bebis/MathMethods/NNs/lecture.pdf
- Aroui , T. , Koubaa , Y. , and Toumi , A. Application of Feed Forward Neural Network for Induction Machine Rotor Faults Diagnostics using Stator Current Journal of Electrical Systems 2007 Li , B. , Chow , M.Y. , Tipsuwan , Y. , and Hung , J.C. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 47 5
- Lipnickas , A. Two-Stage Neural Network Based Classifier System for Fault Diagnosis Computational Intelligence in Fault Diagnosis London Springer-Verlag 2006 209 230
- Simani , S. , Fantuzzi , C. , and Patton , R.J. Model-Based Fault Diagnosis in Dynamic Systems Using Identification Techniques Great Britain Springer-Verlag London Limited 2003
- Zhou , Y. , Hahn , J. , and Mannan , M.S. Fault Detection and Classification in Chemical Processes Based on Neural Networks with Feature Extraction ISA Transactions 42 651 664 2003