Pedestrian Detection During Vehicle Backing Maneuvers Using Ultrasonic Parking Sensors
Published March 31, 2020 by The Stapp Association in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
Ultrasonic parking sensors are an active technology designed to alert drivers to the presence of objects behind their vehicle but not the presence of a human. The purpose of this study was therefore to ascertain if these sensor systems can successfully detect a human subject. We accordingly conducted experiments using four vehicles equipped with both rear-facing center and corner ultrasonic parking sensor systems to determine the detection distance between the vehicle and a 1-m tall, 75-mm diameter pipe, a child, an adult woman, and an adult man. The detection of human subjects was evaluated under front-facing and side-facing conditions behind each vehicle. The results indicate that for a front-facing and side-facing child, the center sensor detection distances were 50-84% and 32-64%, respectively, shorter than that of the pipe. For front-facing and side-facing adults, the center sensor detection distances were just less than or roughly equivalent to that of the pipe at 89-102% and 78-97%, respectively. A similar trend was seen for the corner sensors. Notably, under the side-facing condition, the sensor detection distances were slightly shorter for all subjects than under the front-facing condition. These results reveal that ultrasonic parking sensor systems can not only detect objects but also humans, indicating that ultrasonic sensors are an available countermeasure to prevent backover accidents involving pedestrians. To address the shorter detection distance of children, a combination of ultrasonic parking sensors with other systems, such as backup cameras, may be more effective for avoiding backover collisions.
CitationMatsui, Y., Hosokawa, N., and Oikawa, S., "Pedestrian Detection During Vehicle Backing Maneuvers Using Ultrasonic Parking Sensors," SAE Technical Paper 2019-22-0015, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-22-0015.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 3]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 4]|
- Alonso, L. (2009) Contribuciones al estudio de sistemas ultrasónicos y su aplicación a la seguridad activa en vehículos inteligentes (Contributions to the study of ultrasonic systems and their application to active safety in intelligent vehicles). Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Cantabria, Cantabria, Spain. (in Spanish)
- Austin, R. (2008) Fatalities and injuries in motor vehicle backing crashes. Report to Congress No. HS-811 144. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC.
- Behera, R.K., Gangadharan, J., Kutty, K., Nair, S., Vaidya, V. (2015) A novel method for day time pedestrian detection. SAE International Journal of Passenger Cars-Electronic and Electrical Systems 8(2): 406–412.
- Glazduri, V. (2005) An investigation of the potential safety benefits of vehicle backup proximity sensors. Paper No. 05-0408, Proc. 19th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, Washington, D. C., USA.
- Institute for Traffic Accident Research and Data Analysis of Japan (ITARDA) (2019) Annual traffic accident report in 2018. Tokyo, Japan. (in Japanese)
- Institute for Traffic Accident Research and Data Analysis of Japan (ITARDA) (2018) Annual traffic accident report in 2017. Tokyo, Japan. (in Japanese)
- International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2010) ISO 17386: Transport information and control systems — Manoeuvring Aids for Low Speed Operation (MALSO) —Performance requirements and test procedures. Geneva, Switzerland.
- Japan Automobile Standards Internationalization Center (JASIC) (2015) Test for protection of heads and legs of pedestrians (TRIAS18-J099(2)-01). In: Automobile Type Approval Handbook for Japanese Certification.
- Keall, M.D., Fildes, B., Newstead, S. (2017) Real-world evaluation of the effectiveness of reversing camera and parking sensor technologies in preventing backover pedestrian injuries. Accident Analysis & Prevention 99:39–43.
- Kidd, D. and Brethwaite, A. (2014) Visibility of children behind 2010–2013 model year passenger vehicles using glances, mirrors, and backup cameras and parking sensors. Accident Analysis & Prevention 66:158–167.
- Kidd, D. and McCartt, A.T. (2016) Differences in glance behavior between drivers using a rearview camera, parking sensor system, both technologies, or no technology during low-speed parking maneuvers. Accident Analysis & Prevention 87:92–101.
- Kinsler, L.E., Frey, A.R., Coopens A.B., Sanders, J.V. (2000) Fundamentals of Acoustics, 4th ed.; Wiley: New York City, USA.
- Ljung, M., Jakobsson, L., Lindman, M., Coelingth, E. (2015) Collision avoidance systems-advancements and efficiency. Paper (2015-01-1406) Proc. SAE 2015 World Congress & Exposition; Detroit, MI, USA.
- Matsui, Y., Oikawa, S., Sorimachi, K., Imanishi, A, Fujimura, T. (2016) Association of impact velocity with risks of serious injuries and fatalities to pedestrians in commercial truck–pedestrian accidents. Stapp Car Crash Journal 60:165–182.
- Matsui, Y. and Oikawa, S. (2019) Situational characteristics of fatal pedestrian accidents involving vehicles traveling at low speeds in Japan. Traffic Injury Prevention, 20(S1):S1-S6.
- Nishikawa, S., Niwaya, H., Shibuya, A., Aisaka, N. (1987) Measurement of the surface shape of cloths by ultrasonic sensor. Journal of the Textile Machinery Society of Japan 40(4):174–180. (in Japanese)
- Okugumo, M. (2013) Development research on ultrasound sensor system aiming at external recognition of a car. Yonego National Institute of Technology Journal 48:22–25. (in Japanese)
- Rosén, E., Sander, U. (2009) Pedestrian fatality risk as a function of car impact speed. Accident Analysis & Prevention 41:536–542.