This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Advanced Assembly Solutions for the Airbus RACER Joined-Wing Configuration
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published September 16, 2019 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Event: AeroTech Europe
The Rapid And Cost Effective Rotorcraft (RACER) is being developed by Airbus Helicopters (AH) to demonstrate a new Vertical Take-Off and Landing configuration to fill the mobility gap between conventional helicopters and aeroplanes. RACER is a compound rotorcraft featuring wings and multiple rotors. The wing arrangement suggested by AH is defined as a staggered bi-plane joined configuration with an upper and a lower straight wing, either side of the fuselage, connected at their outboard extent to form a triangular structure. The ASTRAL consortium, consisting of the University of Nottingham and GE Aviation Systems, are responsible for the design, manufacture, assembly and testing of the wings. Producing an optimised strategy to assemble a joined-wing configuration for a passenger carrying rotorcraft is challenging and novel. The objective of this work concerns all aspects of assembling the joined-wing structure.
The joined-wing and fuselage structures will be produced independently and mated together during the final RACER assembly. A multi-stage process will deliver the joined-wing assembly and ensure it will fit to the fuselage. Producing the individual wing structures requires a novel build philosophy driven by the innovative, one-piece composite moulding that forms the leading edge (LE) and upper aerodynamic surface of each wing. Using the Flap sub-assembly as the tool to set interfacing wing-box items provides a cost effective solution to assembly jig design. The independent wing structures must be joined at the outboard hinge line, whilst meeting the fuselage interchangeability definition. Matched tooling, replicating the fuselage interface, will be employed to overcome this hurdle. Successfully joining the wing structures also requires the innovative application of 3D tolerance analysis methods to size bush diameters within the interface.
The overall build philosophy is summarised in this work, including assembly sequencing; definition of datum frames; assembly tooling; design tolerances and the analysis required to deliver assembly key characteristics.
CitationBainbridge, D., Bacharoudis, K., Cini, A., Turner, A. et al., "Advanced Assembly Solutions for the Airbus RACER Joined-Wing Configuration," SAE Technical Paper 2019-01-1884, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-01-1884.
- Blacha, M., Fink, A., Eglin, P., and Cabrit, P. , “Clean Sky 2: Exploring New Rotorcraft High Speed Configurations,” in 43rd European Rotorcraft Forum 2017, Italy, September 12-15, 2017.
- Wolkovitch, J. , “The Joined Wing-An Overview,” Journal of Aircraft 23(3):161-178, 1986, doi:10.2514/3.45285.
- Curran, R. et al. , “Modelling of Aircraft Manufacturing Cost at the Concept Stage,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 31(3-4):407-420, 2006.
- Naing, S., Burley, G., Odi, R., Williamson, A. et al. , “Design for Tooling to Enable Jigless Assembly-An Integrated Methodology for Jigless Assembly,” SAE Technical Paper 2000-01-1765, 2000, doi:10.4271/2000-01-1765.
- Irving, L., Ratchev, S., Popov, A., and Rafla, M. , “Implementing Determinate Assembly for the Leading Edge Sub-Assembly of Aircraft Wing Manufacture,” SAE Int. J. Aerosp. 7(2):246-254, 2014.
- Millar, A. and Kihlman, H. , “Reconfigurable Flexible Tooling for Aerospace Wing Assembly,” SAE Technical Paper 2009-01-3243, 2009, doi:10.4271/2009-01-3243.
- Whitney, D. , Mechanical Assemblies: Their Design, Manufacture and Role in Product Development (Oxford University Press, 2004). ISBN:0-19-515782-6.
- Islam, M. , “Functional Dimensioning and Tolerancing Software for Concurrent Engineering Applications,” Computers in Industry 54:169-190, 2004, doi:10.1016/j.compind.2003.09.006.
- Laperrière, L. and EIMaraghy, H. , “Tolerance Analysis and Synthesis Using Jacobian Transforms,” CIRP Annals 49(1):359-362, 2000, doi:10.1016/S0007-8506(07)62964-3.
- Marziale, M. and Polini, W. , “A Review of Two Models for Tolerance Analysis of an Assembly: Vector Loop and Matrix,” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing 43(11-12):1106-1123, 2009, doi:10.1007/s00170-008-1790-0.
- Ameta, G. and Samper, S. , “Comparison of Spatial Math Models for Tolerance Analysis: Tolerance-Maps, Deviation Domain, and TTRS,” Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering 11, 2011, doi:10.1115/1.3593413.
- Shen, S., Ameta, G., Shah, J., and Davidson, J. , “A Comparative Study of Tolerance Analysis Methods,” Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering 5:247-256, 2005, doi:10.1115/1.1979509.
- Bacharoudis, K., Bainbridge, D., Turner, A., Popov, A. et al “3D Tolerance Analysis of a Joined Wing Concept for a Compound Helicopter to aid Tooling Design Selection,” Submitted to Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 2019.
- Cavallaro, R. and Demasi, L. , “Challenges, Ideas and Innovation of Joined-Wing Configurations: A Concept from the Pas, an Opportunity for the Future,” Prog Aerosp Sci 87:1-93, 2016.
- GE Aviation , “ASTRAL WING UPPER ICY,” RT570R7000, 2018.
- GE Aviation , “ASTRAL W0049NG LOWER ICY,” RT570R7001, 2018.
- Chun-Yung Niu, M. , “Airframe Structural Design,” Chapter 8 - Wing Box Structure, Conmilit Press Ltd, 1988.
- AMF Zero-Point Systems Product Catalogue, www.amf.de/files/amf-assets/news/downloads/catalogues/Catalogue-AMF-Zero-Point-Systems.pdf, accessed April 2019.