This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Low Pressure-Driven Injection Characterization for SCR Applications
Technical Paper
2019-01-0994
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
This content contains downloadable datasets
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
Aqueous Urea is a non-toxic and stable ammonia carrier and its injection and mixing represent the basis for the most common de-NOx technology for mobile applications. The reactant feed preparation process is defined by evaporation, thermolysis and hydrolysis of the liquid mixture upstream the Selective Catalytic Reduction reactor, and it is strongly dependent on the interaction between spray and gaseous flow. Low-pressure driven injectors are the common industrial standard for these applications, and their behavior in almost-ambient pressure cross flows is significantly different from any in-cylinder application. For this reason, two substantially different injectors in terms of geometry and design are experimentally studied, characterizing drop sizes and velocities through Phase Doppler Anemometry (PDA) and liquid mass spatial distribution through Shadow Imaging (SI). The measurements involve the analysis of the spray in quiescent air conditions, gathering information at the closest to the nozzle reliable location. Distilled water and Urea Water Solution are characterized, clearly showing that the spray evolution is only slightly affected by the mixture composition. These experimental findings act as the basis for the construction of a numerical description of liquid injection within the Lagrangian tracking framework inside 3D finite volume CFD simulations. A robust injection model is defined, pointing out the singularities of the system and identifying the most critical aspects. The proposed model is built on the direct definition of a droplet diameter distribution, putting particular attention in the droplet-to-parcel ratio definition. One of the two injectors is taken as the input and the other one, which shows a considerable different design and spray pattern is used as a test for the modeling approach. The simulation setup is then assessed in cross-flow conditions and validated on data gathered in a synthetic exhaust gas test bench, where the injectors are installed in an optically accessible chamber, allowing PDA and SI measurements over a wide range of thermal and kinematic cross flow conditions, representative of typical Diesel after-treatment systems. Good agreement with the experimental data is obtained, highlighting how the definition of the initial spray droplet kinematic properties is the key feature in the correct description of a spray for SCR applications, regardless of the Urea mass fraction in the mixture. The evolution of the liquid plume inside a realistic after-treatment channel size geometry shows that most of the momentum of the spray is carried by the largest droplets, which are the ones to be correctly described to address important issues in the Urea Water Solution dosing; these are responsible for the excessive wall impingement and subsequent formation of solid deposits. Specific care is applied in the definition of a reasonable CFD framework, determining mesh sizes and sub-model setups able to fulfill affordable computational costs, according to the current industrial standards.
Recommended Content
Authors
Citation
Nocivelli, L., Montenegro, G., and Dimopoulos Eggenschwiler, P., "Low Pressure-Driven Injection Characterization for SCR Applications," SAE Technical Paper 2019-01-0994, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-01-0994.Data Sets - Support Documents
Title | Description | Download |
---|---|---|
Unnamed Dataset 1 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 2 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 3 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 4 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 5 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 6 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 7 |
Also In
References
- Nova , I. and Tronconi , E. Urea-SCR Technology for deNOx after Treatment of Diesel Exhausts Springer 2014
- Heywood , J.B. et al. Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals New York McGraw-Hill 1988
- Johnson , T. and Joshi , A. Review of Vehicle Engine Efficiency and Emissions SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-0907 2017 10.4271/2017-01-0907
- Cho , Y.S. , Lee , S.W. , Choi , W.C. , and Yoon , Y.B. Urea-Scr System Optimization with Various Combinations of Mixer Types and Decomposition Pipe Lengths International Journal of Automotive Technology 15 5 723 731 2014
- Park , K. , Hong , C.-H. , Oh , S. , and Moon , S. Numerical Prediction on the Influence of Mixer on the Performance of Urea-Scr System WASET Int. J. of Mech., Aero., Industrial and Mechatronics Eng 8 5 2014
- Birkhold , F. , Meingast , U. , Wassermann , P. , and Deutschmann , O. Analysis of the Injection of Urea-Water-Solution for Automotive SCR DeNox-Systems: Modeling of Two-Phase Flow and Spray/Wall-Interaction SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-0643 2006 10.4271/2006-01-0643
- Birkhold , F. , Meingast , U. , Wassermann , P. , and Deutschmann , O. Modeling and Simulation of the Injection of Urea-Water-Solution for Automotive SCR DeNox-Systems Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 70 1 119 127 2007
- Fischer , S. 2012
- Baleta , J. , Vujanović , M. , Pachler , K. , and Duić , N. Numerical Modeling of Urea Water Based Selective Catalytic Reduction for Mitigation of NOx from Transport Sector Journal of Cleaner Production 88 280 288 2015
- Spiteri , A. and Eggenschwiler , P.D. Experimental Fluid Dynamic Investigation of Urea-Water Sprays for Diesel Selective Catalytic Reduction-Denox Applications Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 53 8 3047 3055 2014
- Liao , Y. , Eggenschwiler , P.D. , Spiteri , A. , Nocivelli , L. et al. Fluid Dynamic Comparison of Adblue Injectors for SCR Applications SAE Int. J. Engines 8 09 2303 2311 2015
- Varna , A. , Spiteri , A.C. , Wright , Y.M. , Dimopoulos Eggenschwiler , P. et al. Experimental and Numerical Assessment of Impingement and Mixing of Urea-Water Sprays for Nitric Oxide Reduction in Diesel Exhaust Applied Energy 157 824 837 2015
- Nocivelli , L. , Montenegro , G. , Onorati , A. , Curto , F. et al. Quantitative Analysis of Low Pressure-Driven Spray Mass Distribution and Liquid Entrainment for scr Application through a Mechanical Patternator SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-0965 2017 10.4271/2017-01-0965
- Varna , A. , Boulouchos , K. , Spiteri , A. , Eggenschwiler , P.D. et al. Numerical Modelling and Experimental Characterization of a Pressure-Assisted Multi-Stream Injector for SCR Exhaust Gas After-Treatment SAE Int. J. Engines 7 4 2012 2021 2014 10.4271/2014-01-2822
- Wigley , G. , Hargrave , G.K. , and Heath , J. A High Power, High Resolution Lda/Pda System Applied to Gasoline Direct Injection Sprays Particle & Particle Systems Characterization 16 1 11 19 1999
- Bhattachayya , A. On a Measure of Divergence between Two Statistical Population Defined by Their Population Distributions Bulletin Calcutta Mathematical Society 35 99-109 28 1943
- Vogel , A. 2016
- Spiteri , A. 2016
- Faeth , G.M. Evaporation and Combustion of Sprays Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 9 1-2 1 76 1983
- Dukowicz , J.K. A Particle-Fluid Numerical Model for Liquid Sprays Journal of Computational Physics 35 2 229 253 1980
- Jasak H. , Jemcov A. , Tukovic Z. et al. Openfoam: A C++ Library for Complex Physics Simulations International Workshop on Coupled Methods in Numerical Dynamics IUC Dubrovnik, Croatia 2007 1000 1 20
- Ström , H. , Lundström , A. , and Andersson , B. Choice of Urea-Spray Models in Cfd Simulations of Urea-Scr Systems Chemical Engineering Journal 150 1 69 82 2009
- Haywood , R.J. , Renksizbulut , M. , and Raithby , G.D. Numerical Solution of Deforming Evaporating Droplets at Intermediate Reynolds Numbers Numerical Heat Transfer, Part A Applications 26 3 253 272 1994
- Ranz WE and Marshall WR Evaporation from Drops Chemical Engineering Progress 48 3 1952
- Elkotb , M.M. Fuel Atomization for Spray Modelling Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 8 1 61 91 1982
- Pilch , M. and Erdman , C.A. Use of Breakup Time Data and Velocity History Data to Predict the Maximum Size of Stable Fragments for Acceleration-Induced Breakup of a Liquid Drop International Journal of Multiphase Flow 13 6 741 757 1987
- Rosin , P. The Laws Governing the Fineness of Powdered Coal J. Inst. Fuel. 7 29 36 1933
- Nocivelli , L. 2017
- Poinsot , T.J. and Lelef , S.K. Boundary Conditions for Direct Simulations of Compressible Viscous Flows Journal of Computational Physics 101 1 104 129 1992
- Stiesch , G. Modeling Engine Spray and Combustion Processes Springer Science & Business Media 2013
- O’Rourke , P.J. 1981
- Curto , F. 2016