This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Seatbelt Entanglement: Field Analysis, Countermeasure Development, and Subject Evaluation of Devices Intended to Reduce Risk
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 02, 2019 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
Since 2000, over 200 rear seat occupants have become entangled in the seatbelt when they inadvertently switched it from emergency locking mode (ELR) to automatic locking mode (ALR). Since a method is needed to lock the seatbelt when installing child restraint systems (CRS), the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) commissioned tool, inc. to develop prototype devices that could reduce the risk of seatbelt entanglement resulting from the lockability requirement. A field analysis of entanglement incidents was first conducted to inform countermeasure design. Prototype devices were developed and evaluated through testing with volunteer subjects in comparison to standard seatbelt systems by assessing how different designs would be used to install CRS, the quality of the resulting installations, how users would disentangle a trapped child surrogate, as well as to identify volunteer experience when using the belts themselves. Four prototype devices were evaluated in two phases of testing conducted at the UMTRI. All four prototype devices had shorter disentanglement times than trials with the standard seatbelt, but there was not a statistically significant difference between the devices. There were no substantial differences in the quality of child restraint installation among the devices and the standard seatbelt.
|Technical Paper||Evaluation of Harness Tightening Procedures for Child Restraint System (CRS) Sled Testing|
|Technical Paper||A Test Method to Assess Interactions and Compatibility of Inflatable Seatbelts with Child Restraint Systems|
CitationKlinich, K., Ebert, S., Malik, L., Manary, M. et al., "Seatbelt Entanglement: Field Analysis, Countermeasure Development, and Subject Evaluation of Devices Intended to Reduce Risk," SAE Technical Paper 2019-01-0619, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-01-0619.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|Unnamed Dataset 1|
|Unnamed Dataset 2|
|Unnamed Dataset 3|
|Unnamed Dataset 4|
|Unnamed Dataset 5|
|Unnamed Dataset 6|
|Unnamed Dataset 7|
|Unnamed Dataset 8|
|Unnamed Dataset 9|
- Klinich , K.D. , Ebert , S.M. , Malik , L.M. , and Manary , M.A.
- Reed , M.P. and Ebert-Hamilton , S.M. Distribution of Belt Anchorage Locations in the Second Row of Passenger Cars and Light Trucks SAE International Journal of Transportation Safety 1 1 25 31 2013 10.4271/2013-01-1157
- Sidman , J. et al. 2015
- National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 2005