This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Hazard Cuing Systems for Teen Drivers: A Test-Track Evaluation on Mcity
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 02, 2019 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
There is a strong evidence that the overrepresentation of teen drivers in motor vehicle crashes is mainly due to their poor hazard perception skills, i.e., they are unskilled at appropriately detecting and responding to roadway hazards. This study evaluates two cuing systems designed to help teens better understand their driving environment. Both systems use directional color-coding to represent different levels of proximity between one’s vehicle and outside agents. The first system provides an overview of the location of adjacent objects in a head-up display in front of the driver and relies on drivers’ focal vision (focal cuing system). The second system presents similar information, but in the drivers’ peripheral vision, by using ambient lights (peripheral cuing system). Both systems were retrofitted into a test vehicle (2014 Toyota Camry). A within-subject experiment was conducted at the University of Michigan Mcity test-track facility. The study collected data from seventeen teen participants. Each participant experienced three cuing conditions (focal cuing, peripheral cuing and dual system cuing conditions) as well as three no cuing system conditions (two practice, a baseline and a post-treatment drive). The order of cuing system exposure was balanced among participants. All drives were approximately six minutes long and contained seven distinct visual hazard obstruction scenarios. Each scenario had a pre-defined critical point. The dependent variables were (a) the minimum clearances between the critical points and the participant’s vehicle, and (b) vehicle speed at the minimum clearance points. Results show that teens drove more slowly and maintained greater distances at critical points when cuing systems were present. These behaviors were more evident with the peripheral cuing system compared to the focal cuing system. These findings suggest that such cuing systems have the potential to address the hazard perception skill deficiency in teenage drivers.
CitationZhang, Y., Kang, T., Flannagan, M., Bao, S. et al., "Hazard Cuing Systems for Teen Drivers: A Test-Track Evaluation on Mcity," SAE Technical Paper 2019-01-0399, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-01-0399.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 3]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 4]|
- Pradhan, A.K., Hammel, K.R., DeRamus, R., Pollatsek, A. et al., “The Use of Eye Movements to Evaluate the Effects of Driver Age on Risk Perception in an Advanced Driving Simulator,” Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 47(4):840-852, 2005, doi:10.1518/001872005775570961.
- Curtin, S.C., Heron, M., Miniño, A.M., and Warner, M., “Recent Increases in Injury Mortality among Children and Adolescents Aged 10-19 Years in the United States: 1999-2016,” National Vital Statistics Reports: From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System 67(4):1-16, 2018. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr67/nvsr67_04.pdf.
- Curry, A.E., Hafetz, J., Kallan, M.J., Winston, F.K., and Durbin, D.R., “Prevalence of Teen Driver Errors Leading to Serious Motor Vehicle Crashes,” Accident Analysis & Prevention 43(4):1285-1290, 2011, doi:10.1016/j.aap.2010.10.019.
- Jermakian, J.S., Bao, S., Buonarosa, M.L., Sayer, J.R., and Farmer, C.M., “Effects of an Integrated Collision Warning System on Teenage Driver Behavior,” The Journal of Safety Research 61:65-75, 2017.
- Mochizuki, M., Goto, K., and Suzuki, K., “An Analysis of Collision Avoidance Effectiveness by Using the Information Displayed in Driver's Peripheral Vision,” SICE Journal of Control, Measurement, and System Integration 8(1):22-26, 2015.
- Yang, S., You, N.Y., and Ferris, T.K., “Supporting Drivers in Concurrent Lane and Speed Tracking Tasks with Novel Visual, Auditory, and Tactile Speedometer Displays,” Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 57(1):1918-1922, 2013.
- Van Veen, T., Karjanto, J., and Terken, J., “Situation Awareness in Automated Vehicles through Proximal Peripheral Light Signals,” in Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, 2017, 287-292. ACM, doi:10.1145/3122986.3122993.
- Wang, C., Steeghs, S., Chakraborty, D., Gorle, A., Dey, D., van de Star, S., Sudhakaran, A. Terken, T., and Hu, J., “Designing for Enhancing Situational Awareness of Semi-autonomous Driving Vehicles,” in Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications Adjunct, 228-229. doi:10.1145/3131726.3132061.
- Endsley, M.R., “Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems,” Human Factors 37(1):32-64, 1995.
- Szczerba, J., Hersberger, R., and Riegelman, A., “Design and Evaluation of a Differential Speedometer,” Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 56(1):1629-1633, 2012, doi:10.1177/1071181312561325.
- Forster, Y., Naujoks, F., and Neukum A., “Your Turn or My Turn? Design of a Human-Machine Interface for Conditional Automation,” in Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, 2016, 253-260. doi:10.1145/3003715.3005463.
- Nespolo, M., Golsch, K., Varughese, S., Upmanue, V., Zhang, Y., McBride, J., Daman, L., Horvath, C., and Krzyzak, T., “Situation Awareness Assistant for Vehicle Control,” U.S. Patent No. 9,522,676, December 20, 2016.
- Nespolo, M., Golsch, K., Varughese, S., Upmanue, V., Zhang, Y., McBride, J., Daman, L., Horvath, C., and Krzyzak, T., “Visual Alert System,” U.S. Patent No. 9,598,010, March 21, 2017.
- Wickens, C.D., Lee, J.D., Liu, Y., and Becker, S.E.G., An Introduction to Human Factors Engineering Second Edition (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson, 2014).
- Flannagan, M.J., Bao, S., Pradhan, A., Sullivan, J., and Zhang, Y., “Varying Levels of Reality in Human Factors Testing: Parallel Experiments at Mcity and in a Driving Simulator,” SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-1374, 2017, doi:10.4271/2017-01-1374.
- McDonald, C.C., Curry, A.E., Kandadai, V., Sommers, M.S., and Winston, F.K., “Comparison of Teen and Adult Driver Crash Scenarios in a Nationally Representative Sample of Serious Crashes,” Accident Analysis & Prevention 72:302-308, 2014, doi:10.1016/j.aap.2014.07.016.
- Risser, R., “Behavior in Traffic Conflict Situations,” Accident Analysis & Prevention 17:179-197, 1985.
- Sullivan, J.M., Tsimhoni, O., and Bogard, S.E., “Warning Reliability and Driver Performance in Naturalistic Driving,” Human Factors 50:845-852, 2008, doi:10.1518/001872008X312332.