Combined Benefits of Variable Valve Actuation and Low-Pressure EGR on SI Engine Efficiency Part 1: Part Load
Published April 2, 2019 by SAE International in United States
Downloadable datasets for this paper availableAnnotation of this paper is available
Modern spark ignited engines face multiple barriers to achieving higher thermal efficiency. This study investigated the potential of utilizing both continuously variable valve actuation (VVA) and low-pressure cooled exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) to improve engine thermal efficiency at part-load conditions. Six speed / load points were investigated on a 1.6 L turbocharged gasoline direct injection engine. A design of experiment (DoE) approach using the Box-Behnken surface response model was conducted. The DoE results revealed different brake specific fuel consumption (BSFC) responses to the valve phasing and the intake valve lift at different operating conditions. Further engine testing was carried out at each speed / load point to confirm the engine efficiency and combustion performance when targeting different valvetrain controls and EGR strategies. The results indicated that utilizing the VVA system could always reduce BSFC at the studied operating conditions. The BSFC reduction was attributed to reduced pumping and incomplete combustion losses. The reduction in losses was attributed to optimizing the amount of hot trapped residuals compared with the fixed valve configuration, and load control through valve phasing and lift and thus de-throttling the engine. The cooled EGR offered further BSFC reduction benefits from the perspective of reducing in-cylinder heat losses provided the combustion stability limit was not exceeded. Additionally, the EGR played an important role for cases where the hot trapped residuals decreased by large amount due to the reduced overlap and increased intake pressure requirement with reduced intake valve lift.
CitationWang, Y., Conway, G., and Chadwell, C., "Combined Benefits of Variable Valve Actuation and Low-Pressure EGR on SI Engine Efficiency Part 1: Part Load," SAE Technical Paper 2019-01-0241, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-01-0241.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 3]|
- Light-Duty Automotive Technology, Carbon Dioxide Emissions, and Fuel Economy Trends: 1975 Through 2016 (Environmental Protection Agency, 2016).
- Davis, S.C., Williams, S.E., Boundy, R.G., and Moore, S., 2016 Vehicle Technologies Market Report (Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 2016), 224.
- Caton, J.A., “A Review of Investigations Using the Second Law of Thermodynamics to Study Internal-Combustion Engines,” SAE Technical Paper 2000-01-1081, 2000, doi:10.4271/2000-01-1081.
- Zhao, H., Advanced Direct Injection Combustion Engine Technologies and Development Volume 1: Gasoline and Gas Engines. Vol. 312 (Woodhead Publishing, 2009).
- Alger, T., Gingrich, J., Mangold, B., and Roberts, C., “A Continuous Discharge Ignition System for EGR Limit Extension in SI Engines,” SAE Int. J. Engines 4(1):677-692, 2011, doi:10.4271/2011-01-0661.
- Alger, T., Gukelberger, R., and Gingrich, J., “Impact of EGR Quality on the Total Inert Dilution Ratio,” SAE Int. J. Engines 9(2):796-806, 2016, doi:10.4271/2016-01-0713.
- Cairns, A., Blaxill, H., and Irlam, G., “Exhaust Gas Recirculation for Improved Part and Full Load Fuel Economy in a Turbocharged Gasoline Engine,” SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-0047, 2006, doi:10.4271/2006-01-0047.
- Caton, J.A., “A Comparison of Lean Operation and Exhaust Gas Recirculation: Thermodynamic Reasons for the Increases of Efficiency,” SAE Technical Paper 2013-01-0266, 2013, doi:10.4271/2013-01-0266.
- Gukelberger, R., Gingrich, J., Alger, T., Almaraz, S. et al., “LPL EGR and D-EGR® Engine Concept Comparison Part 1: Part Load Operation,” SAE Int. J. Engines 8(2):570-582, 2015, doi:10.4271/2015-01-0783.
- Chen, W., Madison, D., Dice, P., Naber, J. et al., “Impact of Ignition Energy Phasing and Spark Gap on Combustion in a Homogenous Direct Injection Gasoline SI Engine Near the EGR Limit,” SAE Technical Paper 2013-01-1630, 2013, doi:10.4271/2013-01-1630.
- Jocsak, J., White, D., Armand, C., and Davis, R.S., “Development of the Combustion System for General Motors' High-Efficiency Range Extender Ecotec Small Gas Engine,” SAE Int. J. Engines (4):8, 1587-1601, 2015, doi:10.4271/2015-01-1272.
- Lanzanova, T., Nora, M.D., and Zhao, H., “Investigation of Early and Late Intake Valve Closure Strategies for Load Control in a Spark Ignition Ethanol Engine,” SAE Int. J. Engines 10(3):858-872, 2017, doi:10.4271/2017-01-0643.
- Cleary, D. and Silvas, G., “Unthrottled Engine Operation with Variable Intake Valve Lift, Duration, and Timing,” SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-1282, 2007, doi:10.4271/2007-01-1282.
- Sens, M., Guenther, M., Hunger, M., Mueller, J. et al., “Achieving the Max - Potential from a Variable Compression Ratio and Early Intake Valve Closure Strategy by Combination with a Long Stroke Engine Layout,” SAE Technical Paper 2017-24-0155, 2017, doi:10.4271/2017-24-0155.
- Wang, Y., Conway, G., and Chadwell, C., Combined Benefits of Variable Valve Actuation and Low-Pressure EGR on SI Engine Efficiency Part 2: High Load (SAE International, 2019).
- Cavazzuti, M., Optimization Methods: From Theory to Design Scientific and Technological Aspects in Mechanics (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2013).
- Box, G.E. and Behnken, D.W., “Some New Three Level Designs for the Study of Quantitative Variables,” Technometrics 2(4):455-475, 1960.