This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Validation of Control-Oriented Heavy Duty Diesel Engine Models for Non-Standard Ambient Conditions
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 2, 2019 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
Complying to both the increasingly stringent pollutant emissions as well as (future) GHG emission legislation - with increased focus on in-use real-world emissions - puts a great challenge to the engine/aftertreatment control development process. Control system complexity, calibration and validation effort has increased dramatically over the past decade. A trend that is likely to continue considering the next steps in emission and GHG emission legislation. Control-oriented engine models are valuable tools for efficient development of engine monitoring and control systems. Furthermore, these (predictive) engine models are more and more used as part of control algorithms to ensure legislation compliant and optimized performance over the system lifetime. For these engine models, it is essential that simulation and prediction of system variables during non-nominal engine operation, such as non-standard ambient conditions, is well captured.
This paper presents the validation of a semi-empirical control-oriented diesel engine model for non-standard ambient conditions. Measurements on a Heavy-Duty Diesel engine for long haulage applications are performed using TNO’s Climate Altitude Chamber. Inhere, ambient conditions are varied ranging from -15°C to + 30°C and ambient pressure ranging from 990 mbar (sea level) to 710 mbar (2500m altitude). Both steady-state and transient engine operation, using both type approval and real-world duty cycles, are considered. For the mentioned range of ambient conditions, the engine model is validated for key performance indicators, like manifold conditions, engine-out temperature, fuel consumption (CO2 emissions) and NOx emissions. The paper will end with a brief overview of possible (future) applications of the validated engine models and outlook to future work.
CitationMentink, P. and Seykens, X., "Validation of Control-Oriented Heavy Duty Diesel Engine Models for Non-Standard Ambient Conditions," SAE Technical Paper 2019-01-0196, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-01-0196.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
- Dauron, A., “Model-Based Powertrain Control: Many Uses, No Abuse,” IFP International Conference, Oil & Gas Science and Technology - Rev. IFP 62(4):427-435, 2007, doi:10.2516/ogst:2007054.
- Isermann, R. and Sequenz, H., “Model-Based Development of Combustion-Engine Control and Optimal Calibration for Driving Cycles: General Procedure and Application,” in 8th IFAC Symposium on Advanced in Automotive Control, Jun. 20-23, 2016, 49, 11, 633-640, doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.08.092.
- Cloudt, R., Saenen, J., Eijnden, E., and Rojer, C., “Virtual Exhaust Line for Model-Based Diesel Aftertreatment Development,” SAE Technical Paper 2010-01-0888, 2010, doi:10.4271/2010-01-0888.
- Eriksson, L. and Nielsen, L., Modeling and Control of Engines and Drivelines (John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2014), doi:10.1002/9781118536186.
- Guzzella, L. and Onder, C. H., Introduction to Modeling and Control of Internal Combustion Engine Systems, Second Edition (Springer, 2010), doi:10.1007/978-3-642-10775-7.
- Wahlström, J. and Eriksson, L., “Modelling Diesel Engines with a Variable-Geometry Turbocharger and Exhaust Gas Recirculation by Optimization of Model Parameters for Capturing Non-Linear System Dynamics,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering 225(7):960-986, 2011, doi:10.1177/0954407011398177.
- Yin, J., Su, T. et al., “Modeling and Validation of a Diesel Engine with Turbocharger for Hardware-in-the-Loop Applications,” Energies 10:685, 2017, doi:10.3390/en10050685.
- Kao, M. and Moskwa, J.J., “Turbocharger Diesel Engine Modeling for Nonlinear Engine Control and State Estimation,” ASME J. Dyn. Sys. Meas. Control 117(1):20-30, 1995, 1995, doi:10.1115/1.2798519.
- Gompel van, P., Willems, F. et al., “Exhaust-Gas Aftertreatment Under Extreme Conditions - Validation in a Climatic-Altitude Chamber,” ATZ Autotechnology 10(3):30-35, 2010, doi:10.1007/BF03247169.
- Wahlström, J., “Control of EGR and VGT for Emission Control and Pumping Work Minimization in Diesel Engines”, Thesis No. 1271, Linköping University, Department of Electrical Engineering, Sweden, 2006.
- Körfer, T., Ruhkamp, L., et al., “Verschärfte Anforderungen an die Luftpfadregelung bei Nutzfahrzeugen,” Motortechnische Zeitschrift (MTZ), FEV, 11/2008.
- Carlson, P., “Flow Through a Throttle Body, A Comparative Study of Heat Transfer, Wall Surface Roughness and Discharge Coefficient,” Linköping University, LIU-IEI-TEK-A-07/0071-SE, Feb. 2007.
- Ramachandran, S., Hommen, G., Mentink, P., Seykens, X. et al., “Robust, Cost-Optimal and Compliant Engine and Aftertreatment Operation Using Air-Path Control and Tailpipe Emission Feedback,” SAE Int. J. Engines 9(3):1662-1673, 2016, doi:10.4271/2016-01-0961.