This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Development of semi-active suspension for Formula SAE vehicle
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published September 3, 2018 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
The design of passive suspension systems is being improved since the early days of the automotive industry in order to obtain the best tradeoff between ride comfort and handling. In this context, passenger cars tend to prioritise ride comfort whilst racing cars tend to focus on handling. On the other hand, Formula SAE is a series of undergraduate competitions in which the students design, build and compete with small, formula-style, mono-seated vehicles. As part of the competition events, the vehicle experiences tight corners and short-length slaloms. The minimum turning diameter and the shortest length of slalom period conducted by Formula SAE prototypes are 9 m and 7.6 m, respectively. Therefore, high controllability of vehicle dynamic behaviour is required in order to enhance the cornering speed, this is achievable by working on the dampers to optimise the rates of load transfer in cornering. This paper describes the development of semiactive control algorithms to optimise the handling performance of a Formula SAE vehicle by reducing the non-suspended mass displacements and tyre load variations, which are meant to be implemented utilising magnetorheological dampers. A magnetorheological fluid is usually described as a functional fluid whose effective viscosity can be dramatically varied reversibly by submitting it to the presence of a magnetic field. The control algorithms (groundhook two-state and groundhook linear) have been developed in MATLAB/Simulink. The full-vehicle multibody models have been implemented in MSC ADAMS/Car. The control and mechanical systems have been afterwards co-simulated in order to evaluate the effectiveness of the control approaches over the vehicle overall performance through single lane-change and swept-sine steer manoeuvres. The influence of the groundhook linear tuning parameter was also studied. The metrics for ride comfort and handling considered were RMS chassis vertical acceleration and RMS tyre vertical displacement, respectively. The outcomes of the present work have shown that for a tuning parameter of 0.6 the best handling performance is achieved whilst for a tuning parameter of 0.8 the best trade-off between handling and ride comfort is achieved. Additionally, it could be concluded that both semi-active suspensions present better performance than the passive one concerning handling and ride comfort. However, the groundhook two-state algorithm achieved an overall better compromise when submitted to different manoeuvres and can be considered more suitable to Formula SAE vehicles.
Citationdos Santos, M., Chrysakis, G., Willmersdorf, R., and Alves, L., "Development of semi-active suspension for Formula SAE vehicle," SAE Technical Paper 2018-36-0224, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-36-0224.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 3]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 4]|
- Savaresi, S., Poussot-Vassal, C., Spelta, C., Sename, O., and Dugard, L., “Semi-Active Suspension Control Design for Vehicles, First Edition,” (Oxford, Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, 2010), ISBN: 978-0-08096-678-6.
- Blundell, M., and Harty, D., “The Multibody Systems Approach to Vehicle Dynamics, Second Edition,” (Oxford, Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, 2014), ISBN: 978-0-08099-425-3.
- Institution of Mechanical Engineers, “Formula Student 2016 Rules,” https://www.imeche.org/events/formula-student/team-information/rules, accessed Feb. 2016.
- Yao, G., Yap, F., Chen, G., Li, W., and Yeo, S., “MR Damper and Its Application for Semi-Active Control of Vehicle Suspension System,” Mechatronics 12(7):963-973, 2002, doi:10.1016/S0957-4158(01)00032-0.
- Koo, J. H., Ahmadian, M., Setareh, M., “Experimental Evaluation of Magnetorheological Dampers for Semi-Active Tuned Vibration Absorbers,” presented at Smart Structures and Materials 2003: Damping and Isolation, USA, July 31, 2003, doi:10.1117/12.483986.
- Kim, R. K., Hong, K. S., “Skyhook Control Using a Full Vehicle Model and Four Relative Displacement Sensors,” presented at 2007 International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems - IFCCAS’07, KOR, October 17-20, 2007, doi: 10.1109/ICCAS.2007.4406920.
- Valásek, M., Kortüm, W., Sika, Z., Magdolen, L., and Vaculin, O., “Development of Semi-Active Road-Friendly Truck Suspensions,” Control Engineering Practice 6(6): 735-744, 1998, doi:10.1016/S0967-0661(98)00079-3.
- Sulaiman, S., Samin., P. M., Jamaluddin., H., Rahman, R. A., and Burhaumudin, M. S., “Groundhook Control of Semi-Active Suspension for Heavy Vehicle,” Int. J. Res. Eng. Technol. 1(3): 146-152, 2012.
- Ahmadian, M., Gonçalves, F. D., Sandu, C., “An Experimental Analysis of Suitability of Various Semi-Active Control Methods for Magnetorheological Vehicle Suspensions,” presented at Smart Structures and Materials 2005: Damping and Isolation, USA, May 16, 2005, doi:10.1117/12.599875.
- Poussot-Vassal, C., Spelta, C., Sename, O., Savaresi, S., Dugard, L., “Survey and Performance Evaluation on Some Automotive Semi-Active Suspension Control Methods: A Comparative Study on a Single-Corner Model,” Annu. Rev. Control. 36(1): 148-160, 2012, doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2012.03.011.
- Komatsuzaki, T., Enomoto, H., Nishimura, H., Hiramatsu, M. et al., “Development of Electronically Controlled Shock Absorber using Magneto-Rheological Fluid,” SAE Technical Paper 200732-0117, 2007.
- Komatsu, H., Enomoto, H., Komatsuzaki, T., and Izumi, K., “Effect of Electrically Controlled MR-Damper on the Cornering of Small Racing Car,” SAE Technical Paper 2011-32-0588, 2011, doi:10.4271/2011-32-0588.
- Metered, H., “Application of Nonparametric Magnetorheological Damper Model in Vehicle Semi-Active Suspension System,” SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars - Mech. Sys. 5(1): 715-726, 2012, doi:10.4271/2012-01-0977.
- Guglielmino, E., Sireteanu, T., Stammers, C., Ghita, G. and Giulea, M., “Semi-active Suspension Control: Improved Vehicle Ride and Road Friendliness, First Edition,” (London, Springer-Verlag, 2008), doi:10.1007/978-1-84800-231-9.
- Chapman, S. J., “MATLAB Programming for Engineers, Second Edition,” (Pacific Grove, Brooks/Cole-Thomson Learning, 2002), ISBN: 978-0-53439-056-3.
- Pacejka, H. B., “Tire and Vehicle Dynamics, Second Edition,” (Oxford, Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, 2005), ISBN: 978-0-75066-918-4.
- Diodato, M. G., Fodor, C., and Hodgson, O., “Vehicle Dynamics System Design for Formula Student Application,” B. Eng. Dissertation, Department of Mechanical, Aerospace and Automotive Engineering, Coventry University, 2016.
- Lees, T., Woolley, J., Mustafa, A., Evans, I., and Fulloway, A., “The Design of a Formula Student Powertrain System,” B. Eng. Dissertation, Department of Mechanical, Aerospace and Automotive Engineering, Coventry U
- #niversity, 2016.
- MSC ADAMS/Car (Version 2015), Computer Software, MSC Software, Newport Beach, CA, 2015.
- The International Organization for Standardization (ISO), “Passenger cars - test track for a severe lane-change manoeuvre - part 1: double lane-change,” ISO 3888-1, Oct 1999.
- The International Organization for Standardization (ISO), “Passenger cars - test track for a severe lane-change manoeuvre - part 2: obstacle avoidance,” ISO 3888-2, Mar 2011.