This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Comparative protocol study between R44 and I-Size regulations for child restraint systems
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published September 03, 2018 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
Children tend to be victims of road accidents more often than is the case for adults. Children made up 2,5% of the total number of road fatalities in the EU countries in 2015 and about 15% of the world? population. They are at about a sixth regarding the risk of dying in a road accident of the average member of the population across the EU as a whole.
The European Union uses the R44.04  homologation standard to assess child restraint systems (CRS), but in 2013 a new regulation was implemented called Enhanced Child Restraint Systems (ECRS) or UNECE R-129 The first step of this regulation, called Phase 1 or I-Size, adds new performance criterion and improved the requirements for the CRS related to safety by introducing side-impact protection, classification based on stature not mass, use of Isofix and mandatory rearward facing until 15 months. Both regulations have been used simultaneously since 2013.
In this paper a comparison study was carried out to analyse the differences between both protocols and regulation requirements in order to assess the benefits and impacts of this new standard.
CitationDomenech, D., Parera, N., and Maturana, G., "Comparative protocol study between R44 and I-Size regulations for child restraint systems," SAE Technical Paper 2018-36-0124, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-36-0124.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|Unnamed Dataset 1|
|Unnamed Dataset 2|
|Unnamed Dataset 3|
- European Commission Traffic Safety Basic Facts on Children, European Commission, Directorate General for Transport June 2017
- Farid Bendjellal 6th International Conference on Protection of Children in Cars - Munich 2008
- Casimir “Child Car Passenger Fatalities - European Figures and In-Depth Study” May 2012