This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Front Airbag Deployment Rates in Real-World Car Accidents in Japan and Implications for Activation of Accident Emergency Calling System
Published November 12, 2018 by The Stapp Association in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
Accident emergency calling systems (AECSs) are signaled by the deployment of airbags, which causes them to automatically emit information providing the location of the accident site to a public service answering party (PSAP). In some real-world accidents, airbags have failed to deploy. This study clarifies the factors that influence the nondeployment of front airbags in vehicle-vehicle collisions, investigating nondeployment of the driver-side front airbags in sedans and light passenger cars (LPCs) from Japanese accident data. The component rates of deployment for front airbags tend to be higher than those of nondeployment at higher values of pseudo-ΔV in vehicle-vehicle frontal impacts. For both sedans and LPCs, the transition zones between nondeployment and deployment of the front airbag occur at pseudo-ΔV values of 30-50 km/h (ΔV ≈ 21-35 km/h). For mutual impact locations where sedans and LPCs impact opponent vehicles at pseudo-ΔV ≥ 40 km/h (ΔV ≈ 28 km/h) in frontal impacts, the component rate of front airbag nondeployment is higher than that of deployment in right-to-right impacts. The results indicate that factors influencing front airbag nondeployment in vehicle-vehicle collisions are ΔV, impact offset configuration, and crossing angle. Considering front airbag nondeployment in real-world accidents, AECSs should have other functions, such as a manual button, to emit information in addition to automatic emission via airbag signaling.
|Collection||Vehicle Dynamics & Simulation, 2007|
|Technical Paper||Automotive and Regulatory Trends in Brazil|
|Technical Paper||A Lightweight Two-Passenger Automobile Combining Improved Crashworthiness, Good Performance, Excellent Fuel Economy|
CitationMatsui, Y. and Oikawa, S., "Front Airbag Deployment Rates in Real-World Car Accidents in Japan and Implications for Activation of Accident Emergency Calling System," SAE Technical Paper 2018-22-0011, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-22-0011.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 3]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 4]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 5]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 6]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 7]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 8]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 9]|
- Augenstein, J., Digges, K., Ogata, S., Perdeck, E., and Stratton, J. (2001) Development and validation of the urgency algorithm to predict compelling injuries. Proc. 17th International Technical Conference on Enhanced Safety of Vehicles. NHTSA, Washington, DC.
- Clark, E.D., and Cushing, M.B. (2002) Predicted effect of automatic crash notification on traffic mortality. Accident Analysis & Prevention 34: 507-513.
- Evanco, M.W. (1999) The potential impact of rural mayday systems on vehicular crash fatalities. Accident Analysis & Prevention 31: 455-462.
- Gabler, H., and Hinch, J. (2008) Evaluation of advanced air bag deployment algorithm performance using event data recorders, Proc. 52nd Annual Conference of the Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine, pp. 175-184.
- Hussain A., Hannan M.A., Mohamed A., Sanusi H., and Ariffin A.K. (2006) Vehicle crash analysis for airbag deployment decision. International Journal of Automotive Technology 7(2): 179-185.
- ITARDA (2018) Annual traffic accident report in 2016 (in Japanese). Tokyo.
- Japan Cabinet Office (2016) Traffic safety master plan for a zero-traffic-accident society. Meeting on Central Traffic Safety Measures (in Japanese).
- JATO Dynamics Limited (2017) Investigation report for side airbag in the world (in Japanese). http://www.jato.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/SideAirbag_Report.pdf
- Kanianthra, J., Carter, A., and Preziotti, G. (2000) Field operational test results of an automated collision notification system. SAE 2000 World Congress & Exposition. Technical Paper No. 2000-01-C041, Detroit.
- Kirk, A., Frampton, R., and Thomas, P. (2002) An evaluation of airbag benefits/disbenefits in European vehicles: A combined statistical and case study approach. International IRCOBI Conference on the Biomechanics of Impact.
- Komaki, H., Kuroda, S., Nioka, T., Konishi, H., and Wakamoto, M. (1993) Development of the electronic “safing” system for airbag ECUs. Fujitsu Ten Technical Report (in Japanese) 22(2): 21-30.
- Matsui, Y., Kubota, M., and Oikawa, S. (2018) Similarity of the measured NIC of a BioRID II dummy in car-to-car rear end impact and sled experiments, International Journal of Automotive Technology, 19(1): 77-83.
- MCFRS (2015) Vehicle safety. MCFRS Driver Certification Program. Rescue Squad Module 12.
- Saruwatari, H., and Yoshida, S. (2011) Research for improve accuracy of crash velocity and ΔV of frontal and rear crash, JAMA-ITARDA collaboration study report.
- UN Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE), UN Regulation No. 94 (2017) Protection of the occupants in the event of a frontal collision.
- UNECE, UN Regulation No. 137 (2016) Frontal collision with focus on the restraint system.
- United Nations Economic and Social Council (2017), Proposal for new regulation on accident emergency call systems. ECE-TRANS-WP29-2017-132e.