This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
The Potential of SNCR Based NOx Reduction in a Double Compression Expansion Engine
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 03, 2018 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (SNCR), used to reduce the emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx), has been a well-established technology in the power plant industry for several decades. The SNCR technique is an aftertreatment strategy based on thermal reduction of NOx at high temperatures. In the compression ignition engine application, the technology has not been applicable due to low exhaust temperatures, which makes the SCR (Selective Catalytic Reduction) system essential for efficient nitrogen oxide reduction to fulfill the environment legislation.
For a general Double Compression Expansion Engine (DCEE) the complete expansion cycle is split in two separate cycles, i.e. the engine is a split cycle engine. In the first cylinder the combustion occurs and in the second stage the combustion gas is introduced and further expanded in a low-pressure expansion cylinder. The combustion cylinder is connected with the expansion cylinder through a large insulated high-pressure tank. If an ammonia based solution is injected after the combustion cylinder, the residence time and high gas temperature in the high-pressure tank allows the Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction mechanisms to ensue. In this paper, AUS 32 vaporization efficiency was studied by injection droplet distribution measurements and CFD simulations.
The Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction concept was evaluated utilizing a 1D GT-SUITE model of a potential DCEE concept where the SNCR based mechanisms were added. Engine speed, normalized stoichiometric ratio (NSR), load and air-fuel excess ratio (λ) were swept in the 1D simulation process.
The simulation results suggest efficient vaporization of AUS 32 and the presence of SNCR mechanisms in the Double Compression Expansion Engine’s medium and high load operating points was verified with conversion efficiency above 50 % in some of the simulation cases for NSR = 1 and close to 80-100 % for NSR = 2 and NSR = 3 when the exhaust gas temperature from the combustion cylinder was in the optimal range for SNCR based reactions.
CitationMuric, K., Tunestal, P., Andersson, A., Andersson, L. et al., "The Potential of SNCR Based NOx Reduction in a Double Compression Expansion Engine," SAE Technical Paper 2018-01-1128, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-01-1128.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 3]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 4]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 5]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 6]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 7]|
- Lam, N.,Tuner, M.,Tunestal, P.,Andersson, A. et al. , “Double Compression Expansion Engine Concepts: A Path to High Efficiency,” SAE Int. J. Engines 8(4):1562-1578, 2015, doi:10.4271/2015-01-1260.
- Bhavani Shankar, V.,Lam, N.,Andersson, A., andJohansson, B. , “Optimum Heat Release Rates for a Double Compression Expansion (DCEE) Engine,” SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-0636 , 2017, doi:10.4271/2017-01-0636.
- Lee, S.,Gonzalez, D.M., andReitz, R. , “Stoichiometric Combustion in a HSDI Diesel Engine to Allow Use of a Three-way Exhaust Catalyst,” SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-1148 , 2006, doi:10.4271/2006-01-1148.
- Shen, M.,Tuner, M., andJohansson, B. , “Close to Stoichiometric Partially Premixed Combustion -The Benefit of Ethanol in Comparison to Conventional Fuels,” SAE Technical Paper 2013-01-0277 , 2013, doi:10.4271/2013-01-0277.
- Scott Sluder, C.,Storey, J.,Lewis, S., andLewis, L. , “Low Temperature Urea Decomposition and SCR Performance,” SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-1858 , 2005, doi:10.4271/2005-01-1858.
- Zhang, X.,Zhang, R., andLin, X. , “Research on SNCR Technology in the Denitration Engineering,” . In: Du W. , editor. Informatics and Management Science I. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering. Vol. 204. (London, Springer, 2013), doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-4802-9_26.
- Muric, K.,Tunestal, P., andStenlaas, O. , “A Fast Crank Angle Resolved Zero-Dimensional NOx Model Implemented on a Field-Programmable Gate Array,” SAE Int. J. Engines 6(1), 2013, doi:10.4271/2013-01-0344.
- Muric, K.,Stenlaas, O.,Tunestal, P., andJohansson, B. , “An In-Cycle based NOx Reduction Strategy using Direct Injection of AdBlue,” SAE Int. J. Engines 7(4):1984-1996, 2014, doi:10.4271/2014-01-2817.
- Willand, J.,Teigeler, M.,Wirbeleit, F.,Enderle, C. et al. , “Selective Non-Catalytic NOx-Reduction in Diesel Engines Using Aqueous Urea,” SAE Technical Paper 982651 , 1998, doi:10.4271/982651.
- Golovitchev, V.,Montorsi, L.,Denbratt, I.,Corcione, F. et al. , “Numerical Evaluation of Direct Injection of Urea as NOx Reduction Method for Heavy Duty Diesel Engines,” SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-0909 , 2007, doi:10.4271/2007-01-0909.
- Krahl, J.,Tanugula, S., andHopf, H. , “Diesel Fuel Additives to Reduce NOx Emissions from Diesel Engines Operated on Diesel and Biodiesel Fuels by SNCR,” SAE Technical Paper 2010-01-2280 , 2010, doi:10.4271/2010-01-2280.
- Burström, P.,Antos, D.,Lundström, T., andMarjavaara, B. , “A CFD-based evaluation of Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction of Nitric Oxide in Iron ore Grate-kiln Plants,” Progress in Computational Fluid Dynamics An International Journal 15:32-46, 2015, doi:10.1504/PCFD.2015.06732.
- EPA , “Technical Bulletin: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx), Why and How They Are Controlled,” US Environment Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, 1998.
- U.S. Environment Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards , “Air Pollution Control Cost Manual”, Section 4 Chapter 1, 2007, EPA 452/B-02-001.
- Chen, M. andWilliams, S. , “Modelling and Optimization of SCR-Exhaust Aftertreatment Systems,” SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-0969 , 2005, doi:10.4271/2005-01-0969.
- Brouwer, J.,Heap, M.P.,Pershing, D.W., andSmith, P.J. , “A Model for Prediction of Selective Noncatalytic Reduction of Nitrogen Oxides by Ammonia, Urea, and Cyanuric Acid with Mixing Limitations in the Presence of CO,” Symposium (International) on Combustion 26(2):2117-2124, 1996, doi:10.1016/S0082-0784(96)80036-1.
- McBridge, B.J. , “NASA Glenn Coefficients for calculating Thermodynamic properties of Individual Species,” TP- 2002-11556, 2002.
- Dong, G.,Morgan, R., andHeikal, M.R. , “Thermodynamic Analysis and System Design of a Novel Split Cycle Engine Concept,” Energy 102:576-585, 2016, doi:10.1016/j.energy.2016.02.102.
- Jang, C.,Choi, S.,Bae, C.,Kim, J. et al. , “Performance of Prototype High Pressure Swirl Injector Nozzles for Gasoline Direct Injection,” SAE Technical Paper 1999-01-3654 , 1999, doi:10.4271/1999-01-3654.
- Abe, M.,Hideharu, E.,Masahiro, S., andIshikawa, T. , “Spray Atomization Study on Multi-Hole Nozzle for Direct Injection Gasoline Engines,” SAE Technical Paper 2013-01-1596 , 2013, doi:10.4271/2013-01-1596.