This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Accuracy Assessment of Three-Dimensional Vehicle Edge Features Generated with Aid of Photogrammetric Epipolar Lines
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 03, 2018 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
Photogrammetry is widely used in the automotive and accident reconstruction communities to extract three-dimensional information from photographs. Prior studies in the literature have demonstrated the accuracy of such methods when photographs contain easily-identifiable, distinct points; however, it is often desirable to determine measurements for locations where a seam, edge, or contour line is available. To exploit such details, an analyst can control the direction that the epipolar line is projected onto the camera plane by strategic selection of photographs. This process constrains the search for the corresponding 3D point to a straight line that can be projected perpendicular to the seam, edge, or contour line. Thus, the goal of this study was to evaluate the modeling accuracy for cases in which an analyst uses epipolar lines in a workflow. To do so, artificial images were created using a computer-generated camera within a computer-assisted drawing environment to allow for a known reference model to compare with results produced using photogrammetry. A systematic study was undertaken by modeling two-dimensional curves on a plane, three-dimensional curves on a curved surface, and then curved edges on a vehicle model. Each model was assessed for accuracy, and the sensitivity of the accuracy to camera placement was carefully examined and explained. Finally, the procedures were applied to an actual vehicle, for which the results were compared to a 3D laser scan of the vehicle. In conclusion, the average residual error between a photogrammetry model created with the aid of epipolar lines and 3D scanned points for a three-dimensional vehicle edge feature was 1.69 mm (SD = 0.55 mm).
|Technical Paper||Computer Accident Simulation - Pretty Pictures and the Real World|
|Technical Paper||Improvement of Ease of Viewing Images on an In-vehicle Display and Reduction of Carsickness|
CitationLong, A. and Noll, S., "Accuracy Assessment of Three-Dimensional Vehicle Edge Features Generated with Aid of Photogrammetric Epipolar Lines," SAE Technical Paper 2018-01-0530, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-01-0530.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|Unnamed Dataset 1|
|Unnamed Dataset 2|
|Unnamed Dataset 3|
- Linder , W. Digital Photogrammetry: A Practical Course Third Berlin Springer-Verlag 2009 10.1007/978-3-540-92725-9
- Randles , B. , Jones , B. , Welcher , J. , Szabo , T. et al. The Accuracy of Photogrammetry vs. Hands-On Measurement Techniques Used in Accident Reconstruction SAE Technical Paper 2010-01-0065 2010 10.4271/2010-01-0065
- Peck , L.R. and Cheng , M.H. The Accuracy of an Optimized, Practical Close-Range Photogrammetry Method for Vehicular Modeling SAE Int. J. Trans. Safety 4 2 2016 10.4271/2016-01-1462
- Jurkofsky , D.A. Accuracy of SUAS Photogrammetry for Use in Accident Scene Diagramming SAE Int. J. Trans. Safety 3 2 136 152 2015 10.4271/2015-01-1426
- Autodesk, Inc. 2016
- Neale , W.T. , Hessell , D. , and Tepstra , T. Photogrammetric Measurement Error Associated with Lens Distortion SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-0286 2011 10.4271/2011-01-0286
- Eos Systems, Inc. 2017
- FARO tutorial (February 10, 2017) https://knowledge.faro.com/ 2017