This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Comparison of Transient Diesel Spray Break-Up between Two Computational Fluid Dynamics Codes
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 3, 2018 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
Accurate modeling of the initial transient period of spray development is critical within diesel engines, as it impacts on the amount of vapor penetration and hence the combustion characteristics of the spray. In addition, in multiple injection schemes shorter injections will be mostly, if not totally, within the initial transient period. This paper investigates how two different commercially available Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) codes (hereafter noted as Code 1 and Code 2) simulate transient diesel spray atomization, in a non-combusting environment. The case considered for comparison is a single-hole injection of n-dodecane representing the Engine Combustion Network’s ‘Spray A’ condition. It was identified that the different spray break-up models used by the codes (Reitz-Diwakar for Code 1, Kelvin-Helmholtz/Rayleigh-Taylor (KH-RT) for Code 2) had a significant impact on the transient liquid penetration. From differing initial base setups, Code 1’s case was then matched as closely as possible to Code 2’s case, applying the KH-RT break-up model in Code 1 with the same constants for the break-up and turbulence models as in Code 2. Despite the nominal equivalence between the two simulations, there existed a discrepancy in liquid length prediction throughout injection between codes. This was thought to be caused by differing implementations of the KH-RT model in both codes. Therefore, a new implementation of the KH-RT model was input into Code 1 in order to allow correct matching of the liquid length to experimental data throughout the injection period. This was achieved utilizing a numerical switch based on the Ohnesorge number. Results from the new model are shown and compared to the previous implementation, showing an improved ability to match to experimental data. Differences between the results from the modified KH-RT model in Code 1 and the standard implementation in Code 2 are also discussed.
CitationNicholson, L., Fang, X., Camm, J., Davy, M. et al., "Comparison of Transient Diesel Spray Break-Up between Two Computational Fluid Dynamics Codes," SAE Technical Paper 2018-01-0307, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-01-0307.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 3]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 4]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 5]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 6]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 7]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 8]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 9]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 10]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 11]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 12]|
- Koss, H.J., Wiartalla, A., and Backer, H., “Spray Propagation, Mixture Fomation, Auto-ignition and Soot Formation of Multi-Component Fuels in a Pressure Chamber” IDEA-EFFECT 2nd. periodic report 1993, 515-542.
- Siebers, D.L. and Higgins, B., “Flame Lift-Off on Direct-Injection Diesel Sprays under Quiescent Conditions,” SAE Technical Paper 2001-01-0530 , 2001, doi:10.4271/2001-01-0530.
- Senecal, P.K., Pomraning, E., Richards, K., and Som, S., “Grid Convergent Spray Models for Internal Combustion Engine CFD Simulations,” ASME Paper No. ICEF2012-92043, 2012.
- Pickett, L.M., Genzale, C.L., Bruneaux, G., Malbec, L.M. et al. , “Comparison of Diesel Spray Combustion in Different High-Temperature, High-Pressure Facilities,” SAE Int. J. Engines 3(2):156-181, 2010, doi:10.4271/2010-01-2106.
- Pickett, L.M., “Introducing the Engine Combustion Network,” International Multidimensional Engine Modeling User’s Group Meeting, 2008.
- Senecal, P.K., Pomraning, E., Richards, K.J., Briggs, T.E. et al. , “Multi-Dimensional Modeling of Direct-Injectcion Diesel Spray Liquid Length and Flame Lift-Off Length Using CFD and Parallel Detailed Chemistry,” SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-1043 , 2003, doi:10.4271/2003-01-1043.
- Lucchini, T., D’Errico, G., Ettore, D., and Ferrari, G., “Numerical Investigation of Non-Reacting and Reacting Diesel Sprays in Constant-Volume Vessels,” SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 2(1):966-975, 2009, doi:10.4271/2009-01-1971.
- Som, S., Senecal, P.K., and Pomraning, E., “Comparison of RANS and LES Turbulence Models against Constant Volume Diesel Experiments,” 24th Annual Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems, ILASS Americas, San Antonio, 2012.
- Blomberg, C.K., Zeugin, L., Pandurangi, S.S., Bolla, M. et al. , “Modeling Split Injections of ECN ‘Spray A’ Using a Conditional Moment Closure Combustion Model with RANS and LES,” SAE Int. J. Engines 9(4):2107-2119, 2016, doi:10.4271/2016-01-2237.
- Beard, P., Duclos, J.M., Habchi, C., Bruneaux, G. et al. , “Extension of Lagrangian-Eulerian Spray Modeling: Application to High Pressure Evaporating Diesel Sprays,” SAE Technical Paper 2000-01-1893 , 2000, doi:10.4271/2000-01-1893.
- Schmidt, D.P. and Rutland, C.J., “A New Droplet Collision Algorithm,” Journal of Computational Physics 164, 2000.
- Schmidt, D.P. and Senecal, P.K., “Improving the Numerical Accuracy of Spray Simulations,” SAE Technical Paper 2002-01-1113 , 2002, doi:10.4271/2002-01-1113.
- Burluka, A.A. and Borghi, R., “Development of a Eulerian Model for the ‘atomization’ of a Liquid Jet,” Atomization and Sprays 11, 2001.
- Som, S., D’Errico, G., Longman, D., and Lucchini, T., “Comparison and Standardization of Numerical Approaches for the Prediction of Non-Reacting and Reacting Diesel Sprays,” SAE Technical Paper 2012-01-1263 , 2012, doi:10.4271/2012-01-1263.
- Mulemane, A., Subramaniyam, S., Lu, P.H., Han, J.S. et al. , “Comparing Cavitation in Diesel Injectors Based on Different Modeling Approaches,” SAE Technical Paper 2004-01-0027 , 2004, doi:10.4271/2004-01-0027.
- Karrholm, F.P., Tao, F., and Nordin, N., “Three-Dimensional Simulation of Diesel Spray Ignition and Flame Lift-Off Using OpenFOAM and KIVA-3V CFD Codes,” SAE Technical Paper 2008-01-0961 , 2008, doi:10.4271/2008-01-0961.
- Iynegar, S.V., Tsang, C.W., and Rutland, C., “Validating Non-Reacting Spray Cases with KIVA-3V and OpenFoam,” SAE Technical Paper 2013-01-1595 , 2013, doi:10.4271/2013-01-1595.
- Pickett, L., “Engine Combustion Network,” www.sandia.gov/ecn/index.php, 2014, accessed Aug 2017.
- Dukowicz, J.K., “A Particle-Fluid Numerical Model for Liquid Sprays,” Journal of Computational Physics 35(2), 1980.
- Launder, B.E. and Spalding, D.B., “The Numerical Computation of Turbulent Flows,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 3(2), 1974.
- CMT-Motores Termicos , “ECN Rate of Injection Calculator,” www.cmt.upv.es/ECN03.aspx, accessed Sep 2017.
- CD-Adapco , “Star-CD Methodology,” 2015.
- Huh, K.Y. and Gosman, A.D., “A Phenomenological Model of Diesel Spray Atomization,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Multiphase Flows 2:515-518, Sep 1991.
- Reitz, R.D. and Diwakar, R., “Effect of Drop Break-Up on Fuel Sprays,” SAE Tehcnical Paper 860469 , 1986, doi:10.4271/860469.
- Gosman, A.D. and Ioannides, E., “Aspects of Computer Simulation of Liquid-Fuelled Combustors,” AIAA 19th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, St. Louis, 1981.
- El Wakil, M.M., Uyehara, O.A., and Myers, P.S., “A Theoretical Investigation of the Heating-Up Period of Injected Fuel Droplets Vaporizing in Air,” 1954.
- Ranz, W.E. and Marshall, W.R., “Evaporation from Drops,” Chem. Eng. Prog 48(3), 1952.
- CS Inc. , “CONVERGE Methodology,” 2017.
- Reitz, R.D. and Diwakar, R., “Structure of High-Pressure Fuel Sprays,” SAE Technical Paper 870598 , 1987, doi:10.4271/870598.
- Beale, J.C. and Reitz, R.D., “Modeling Spray Atomzation with the Kelvin-Helmholtz/Rayleigh-Taylor Hybrid Model,” Atomization and Sprays 9(6), 1999.
- Xin, J., Ricart, L., and Reitz, R.D., “Computer Modeling of Diesel Spray Atomization and Combustion,” Combustion Science and Technology 137(1-6), 1998.
- Reitz, R.D., “Modeling Atomzation Processes in High-Pressure Vaporizing Sprays,” Atomisation and Spray Technology 3(4), 1987.
- Joseph, D.D., Belanger, J., and Beavers, G.S., “Break-Up of a Liquid Drop Suddenly Exposed to a High-Speed Airstream,” International Journal of Multiphase Flow 25(6), 1999.
- Camm, J., Davy, M., Fang, X.H., Doherty, L. et al. , “The Oxford Cold Driven Shock Tube (CDST) for Fuel Spray and Chemical Kinectics Research,” SAE Technical Paper 2018-01-0222 , 2018, doi:10.4271/2018-01-0222.