This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Choice of Tuning Parameters on 3D IC Engine Simulations Using G-Equation
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 03, 2018 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
3D CFD spark-ignition IC engine simulations are extremely complex for the regular user. Truly-predictive CFD simulations for the turbulent flame combustion that solve fully coupled transport/chemistry equations may require large computational capabilities unavailable to regular CFD users. A solution is to use a simpler phenomenological model such as the G-equation that decouples transport/chemistry result. Such simulation can still provide acceptable and faster results at the expense of predictive capabilities. While the G-equation is well understood within the experienced modeling community, the goal of this paper is to document some of them for a novice or less experienced CFD user who may not be aware that phenomenological models of turbulent flame combustion usually require heavy tuning and calibration from the user to mimic experimental observations. This study used ANSYS® Forte, Version 17.2, and the built-in G-equation model, to investigate two tuning constants that influence flame propagation in 3D CFD SI engine simulations: the stretch factor coefficient, Cms and the flame development coefficient, Cm2. After identifying several Cm2-Cms pairs that matched experimental data at one operating conditions, simulation results showed that engine models that used different Cm2-Cms sets predicted similar combustion performance, when the spark timing, engine load, and engine speed were changed from the operating condition used to validate the CFD simulation. A dramatic shift was observed when engine speed was doubled, which suggested that the flame stretch coefficient, Cms, had a much larger influence at higher engine speeds compared to the flame development coefficient, Cm2. Therefore, the Cm2-Cms sets that predicted a higher turbulent flame under higher in-cylinder pressure and temperature increased the peak pressure and efficiency. This suggest that the choice of the Cm2-Cms will affect the G-equation-based simulation accuracy when engine speed increases from the one used to validate the model. As a result, for the less-experienced CFD user and in the absence of enough experimental data that would help retune the tuning parameters at various operating conditions, the purpose of a good G-equation-based 3D engine simulation is to guide and/or complement experimental investigations, not the other way around. Only a truly-predictive simulation that fully couples the turbulence/chemistry equations can help reduce the amount of experimental work.1
CitationLiu, J., Szybist, J., and Dumitrescu, C., "Choice of Tuning Parameters on 3D IC Engine Simulations Using G-Equation," SAE Technical Paper 2018-01-0183, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-01-0183.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 3]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 4]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 5]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 6]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 7]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 8]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 9]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 10]|
- Hessel, R., Reitz, R., Yue, Z., Musculus, M., and O’Connor, J., “Applying Advanced CFD Analysis Tools to Study Differences Between Start-Of-Main and Start-Of-Post Injection Flow, Temperature and Chemistry Fields Due to Combustion of Main-Injected Fuel,” SAE Int. J. Engines 8(5):2159-2176, 2015, doi:10.4271/2015-24-2436.
- Bartolucci, L., Cordiner, S., Mulone, V., Rocco, V. et al., “Partially Stratified Charge Natural Gas Combustion: A LES Numerical Analysis,” SAE Technical Paper 2015-01-0398, 2015, doi:10.4271/2015-01-0398.
- ANSYS®, “Academic Research Mechanical and CFD, Release 17.2.”
- Convergent Science, “Converge CFD.”
- OpenCFD Ltd, “Openfoam®.”
- Verma, I., Bish, E., Kuntz, M., Meeks, E. et al., “CFD Modeling of Spark Ignited Gasoline Engines- Part 1: Modeling the Engine Under Motored and Premixed-Charge Combustion Mode,” SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-0591, 2016, doi:10.4271/2016-01-0591.
- Verma, I., Bish, E., Kuntz, M., Meeks, E. et al., “CFD Modeling of Spark Ignited Gasoline Engines- Part 2: Modeling the Engine in Direct Injection Mode along with Spray Validation,” SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-0579, 2016, doi:10.4271/2016-01-0579.
- McNenly, M.J., Whitesides, R.A., and Flowers, D.L., “Faster Solvers for Large Kinetic Mechanisms Using Adaptive Preconditioners,” Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 35(1):581-587, 2015, doi:10.1016/j.proci.2014.05.113.
- Ra, Y. and Reitz, R.D., “A Combustion Model for IC Engine Combustion Simulations with Multi-Component Fuels,” Combustion and Flame 158(1):69-90, 2011, doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2010.07.019.
- Williams, F. A. “3. Turbulent Combustion,” The Mathematics of Combustion, J. Buckmaster, ed., 97-131.
- ANSYS® Forte, Release 17.2, “User Guide”, Ansys, Inc.
- Peters, N., “Turbulent Combustion,” (Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press, 2000).
- Liang, Long, Rolf D.Reitz, JianwenYi, and Claudia O.Iyer. “A G-Equation Combustion Model Incorporating Detailed Chemical Kinetics for PFI/DI SI Engine Simulations,” SAE Congress, April 2006, Vol. 2.
- Liang, L., Reitz, R., Iyer, C., and Yi, J., “Modeling Knock in Spark-Ignition Engines Using a G-Equation Combustion Model Incorporating Detailed Chemical Kinetics,” SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-0165, 2007, doi:10.4271/2007-01-0165.
- Tan, Z. and Reitz, R.D., “An Ignition and Combustion Model Based on the Level-Set Method for Spark Ignition Engine Multidimensional Modeling,” Combustion and Flame 145(1):1-15, 2006, doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2005.12.007.
- Tan, Z., Kong, S., and Reitz, R., “Modeling Premixed and Direct Injection SI Engine Combustion Using the G-Equation Model,” SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-1843, 2003, doi:10.4271/2003-01-1843.
- Liang, L. and Reitz, R., “Spark Ignition Engine Combustion Modeling Using a Level Set Method with Detailed Chemistry,” SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-0243, 2006, doi:10.4271/2006-01-0243.
- Metghalchi, M. and Keck, J.C., “Burning Velocities of Mixtures of Air with Methanol, Isooctane, and Indolene at High Pressure and Temperature,” Combustion and Flame 48:191-210, 1982, doi:10.1016/0010-2180(82)90127-4.
- Gülder, Ömer L. “Laminar Burning Velocities of Methanol, Ethanol and Isooctane-Air Mixtures,” Symposium (international) on combustion 19, no. 1, pp. 275-281, 1982, doi:10.1016/S0082-0784(82)80198-7, Elsevier.
- Fan, L., Li, G., Han, Z., and Reitz, R., “Modeling Fuel Preparation and Stratified Combustion in a Gasoline Direct Injection Engine,” SAE Technical Paper 1999-01-0175, 1999, doi:10.4271/1999-01-0175.
- Tan, Zhichao. “Multi-Dimensional Modeling of Ignition and Combustion in Premixed and DIS/CI (direct injection spark/compression ignition) Engines,” 2004, 4008-4008.
- Herweg, R. and Maly, R., “A Fundamental Model For Flame Kernel Formation in S. I. Engines,” SAE Technical Paper 922243, 1992, doi:10.4271/922243.
- Han, Z. and Reitz, R.D., “Turbulence Modeling of Internal Combustion Engines Using RNG κ-ε Models,” Combustion Science and Technology 106(4-6):267-295, 1995, doi:10.1080/00102209508907782.
- Chang, Y., and Szybist, J., “Fuel Effects on Combustion with EGR Dilution in Spark Ignited Engines,” Proceedings of the 2016 Central States Meeting of the Combustion Institute, Paper No. 145IC-0082.
- Matsumoto, A., Zheng, Y., Xie, X., Lai, M. et al., “Characterization of Multi-Hole Spray and Mixing of Ethanol and Gasoline Fuels under DI Engine Conditions,” SAE Technical Paper 2010-01-2151, 2010, doi:10.4271/2010-01-2151.
- Matsumoto, A., Zheng, Y., Xie, X., Lai, M. et al., “Interactions of Multi-Hole DI Sprays with Charge Motion and their Implications to Flexible Valve-Trained Engine Performance,” SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-1883, 2011, doi:10.4271/2011-01-1883.
- Mehl, M., Chen, J.-Y., Pitz, W.J., Mani Sarathy, S. et al., “An Approach for Formulating Surrogates for Gasoline with Application toward a Reduced Surrogate Mechanism for CFD Engine Modeling,” Energy & Fuels 25(11):5215-5223, 2011, doi:10.1021/ef201099y.
- Mehl, M., Pitz, W.J., Westbrook, C.K., and Curran, H.J., “Kinetic Modeling of Gasoline Surrogate Components and Mixtures under Engine Conditions,” Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 33(1):193-200, 2011, doi:10.1016/j.proci.2010.05.027.
- Yakhot, V. and Orszag, S.A., “Renormalization Group Analysis of Turbulence. I. Basic Theory,” Journal of Scientific Computing 1(1):3-51, 1986, doi:10.1007/BF01061452.