This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
A Tailor Welded Blanks Design of Automotive Front Rails by ESL Optimization for Crash Safety and Lightweighting
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 03, 2018 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
Utilizing the tailor welded blanks (TWBs) design along with the latest AHSS grades for the front rails on a sedan was studied to reduce the weight of the vehicle and improve the crash safety performance. To find the most efficient material usage, the front rail parts were tailored into multiple blanks with varying thickness. A structural thickness optimization study of the tailored front rails was conducted for IIHS moderate overlap frontal crash, and the tailored blank thickness was set as design variable. The equivalent static loads (ESL) method was adopted for the thickness optimization, which allows many design variables to be optimized simultaneously. The torsion and bending stiffness of the sedan body in prime were set as design constraints, and would not be compromised. The optimal thickness configurations of the TWB designs by ESL optimization suggest that the weight of the frontal rails can be reduced by more than 30% while still maintaining the crash safety performance. These TWB designs were validated by US-NCAP full frontal impact and show similar performance with baseline. A 3rd gen AHSS, NEXMET™1000, was selected on four parts of the front rails to replace the baseline HSLA350. The optimal tailored frontal rail design using NEXMET™1000 grade was obtained through ESL thickness optimization and validated by US-NCAP full frontal impact. Compared with HSLA350, the NEXMET™1000 grade offers better crash safety performance with more weight reduction potential.
An optimal thickness coefficient is proposed in this study to evaluate the material efficiency of the tailored blanks and the amount of thickness changes required for each blank to reach the most efficient material usage. The optimal TWB thickness configurations for HSLA350 and NEXMET™1000 grades through ESL were evaluated using this optimal thickness coefficient. The critical locations on front rails for crash safety were identified and the amount of thickness changes needed characterized. The tailor welded blanks technology can be implemented in the front rail design to reduce weight and improve crash safety. This optimal thickness coefficient can guide the automotive design for lightweighting.
CitationLiang, J., Powers, J., and Stevens, S., "A Tailor Welded Blanks Design of Automotive Front Rails by ESL Optimization for Crash Safety and Lightweighting," SAE Technical Paper 2018-01-0120, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-01-0120.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
- Tamareli, C.M., “AHSS101- The Evolving Use of Advanced High-Strength Steels for Automotive Applications,” (Southfield, Michigan, USA, Steel Market Development Institute, 2011).
- Morgans, S., “AHSS Technologies in the 2011 Ford Explorer,” Great Designs in Steel, Livonia, Michigan, USA, May 2011.
- Grabowski, T., “Chevrolet Silverado/GMC Sierra Body 1500 Cab Structure Review,” Great Designs in Steel, Livonia, Michigan, USA, May 2014.
- Keeler, S. and Kimchi, M., “Advanced High Strength Steels Application Guidelines Version 5.0,” (Brussels, WorldAutoSteel, 2014).
- Coakley, D. and Zischke, J., “Advanced High-Strength Steel Technologies in the 2016 Nissan Maxima,” Great Designs in Steel, Livonia, Michigan, USA, May 2014.
- Swartzell, T. A., “Light Weighting and Steel Technologies in the All-New 2016 Chevrolet Malibu and 2017 Buick LaCrosse,” Great Designs in Steel, Livonia, Michigan, USA, May 2016.
- Furusako, S., Uenishi, A. and Miyazaki, Y., “Improvement of Crashworthiness by Application of High-Strength Steel,” Nippon Steel Technical Report No. 95, 2007.
- Kuziak, R., Kawalla, R., and Waengler, S., “Advanced High Strength Steels for Automotive Industry,” Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering 8(2):103-117, 2008.
- Matlock, D., Speer, J., De Moor, E., and Gibbs, P., “Recent Developments in Advanced High Strength Sheet Steels for Automotive Applications: An Overview,” JESTECH 15(1):1-12, 2012.
- Tisza, M., “Advanced Materials for Automotive Application,” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 47:012010, 2013, doi:10.1088/1757-899X/47/1/012010.
- Nakagaito, T., Matsuoka, S., Kaneko, S., Kawasaki, Y. et al., “Method for Manufacturing High Strength Galvanized Steel with Excellent Formability,” U.S. Patent: US20140182748A1, July 2014.
- Thomas, G. and Garza-Martinez, L., “High Strength Steel Exhibiting Good Ductility and Method of Production via Quenching and Partitioning Treatment by Zinc Bath,” PCT/US2014/038425, Nov 2014.
- Powers, J., Thomas, G., Gill, A. and Case, E., “AK Steel’s Development of AHSS Steel Grades for Body Structures and Their Applications,” International Automotive Body Congress, Sep 2016.
- Petersen, E., “Development of Innovative Steel Grades and Their Applications in Automotive Structures,” Great Designs in Steel, Livonia, Michigan, USA, May 2016.
- Vanderplaats, G.N., “Thirty Years of Modern Structural Optimization,” Advances in Engineering Software 16(2):81-88, 1993.
- Bendsoe, M.P., “Optimization of Structural Topology, Shape, and Material,” (Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer, 1995), doi:10.1007/978-3-662-03115-5.
- Bobaru, F. and Mukherjee, S., “Shape Sensitivity Analysis and Shape Optimization in Planar Elasticity Using the Element-Free Galerkin Method,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 190(32-33):4319-4337, 2001.
- Eschenauer, H.A. and Olhoff, N., “Topology Optimization of Continuum Structures: A Review,” Applied Mechanics Reviews 54(4):331-390, 2001.
- Tanskanen, P., “The Evolutionary Structural Optimization Method: Theoretical Aspects,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 191(47-48):5485-5498, 2002.
- Leiva, J. P., Watson, B. C. and Kosaka, I., “A Comparative Study of Topology and Topometry Structural Optimization Methods within the GENESIS SOFTWARE,” 7th World Congresses of Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Seoul, Korea, May 2007.
- Ide, T., Otomori, M., Leiva, J.P., and Watson, B.C., “Structural Optimization Methods and Techniques to Design Light and Efficient Automatic Transmission of Vehicles with Low Radiated Noise,” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 50(6):1137-1150, 2014.
- Hassani, B., Tavakkoli, S.M., and Ghasemnejad, H., “Simultaneous Shape and Topology Optimization of Shell Structures,” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 48(1):221-233, 2013.
- Guo, X. and Cheng, G., “Recent Development in Structural Design and Optimization,” Acta Mechanica Sinica 26:807-823, 2010.
- Lee, Y., Ahm, J. and Park, G., “Crash Optimization of Automobile Frontal and Side Structures Using Equivalent Static Loads,” 11th World Congress on Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Sydney, Australia, June 2015.
- Craig, K.J., Stander, N., Dooge, D.A., and Varadappa, S., “Automotive Crashworthiness Design Using Response Surface Based Variable Screening and Optimization,” Engineering Computations 22(1):38-61, 2005, doi:10.1108/02644400510572406.
- Venter, G., Haftka, R.T., and Starnes, J.H., “Construction of Response Surface Approximations for Design Optimization,” AIAA Journal 36(12):2242-2249, 1998.
- Jeong, S.B., Yi, S.I., Kan, C.D., Nagabhushana, V. et al., “Structural Optimization of an Automobile Roof Structure Using Equivalent Static Loads,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering 222(11):1985-1995, 2008.
- Lee, H. A. and Park, G. J., “Development of an Optimization Software System for Nonlinear Dynamics Using the Equivalent Static Load Method,” 10th World Congress on Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Orlando, USA, May 2013.
- Genest, L., Jézéquel, L., Gillot, F. and Mercier, F., “Shape Optimization Method for Crashworthiness Design Based on Equivalent Static Loads Concept,” 11th World Congress on Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Sydney, Australia, Jun 2015.
- Jang, H. H. and Lee, H. A., “Dynamic Response Topology Optimization in the Time Domain Using Equivalent Static Loads,” 52nd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Denver, Colorado, Apr 2011, AIAA2011-2090.
- Yi, S.I., Lee, H.A., and Park, G.J., “Optimization of a Structure with Contact Conditions Using Equivalent Loads,” Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 25(3):773-782, 2011, doi:10.1007/s12206-011-0129-1.
- Christensen, J., Bastien, C., and Blundell, M.V., “The Feasibility of ESLM for BIW Roof Structure Development and Optimization,” Journal of Mathematical Research and Applications 1(2):34-47, 2013.
- Kinsey, B., Liu, Z., and Cao, J., “A Novel Forming Technology for Tailor-Welded Blanks,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology 99(1-3):145-153, 2000.
- Bhaskar, V.V., Narayanan, R.G., and Narasimhan, K., “Effect of Thickness Ratio on Formability of Tailor Welded Blanks,” AIP Conference Proceedings 712(863), 2004.
- Safdarian, R., Jorge, R.M.N., Santos, A.D., Naeini, H.M. et al., “A Comparative Study of Forming Limit Diagram Prediction of Tailor Welded Blanks,” International Journal of Material Forming 8(2):293-304, 2015.
- Hirt, G., Abratis, C., and Ames, J., “Manufacturing of Sheet Metal Parts from Tailor Rolled Blanks,” Journal for Technology of Plasticity 30:1, 2005.
- Zoernack, M., “Material Related Design with Tailor Rolled Products,” Great Designs in Steel, May 2016.
- “IIHS Moderate Overlap Frontal Crashworthiness Evaluation Crash Test Protocol”, iihs.org. July 2017.
- Chan, S.M., Chan, L.C., and Lee, T.C., “Tailor-Welded Blanks of Different Thickness Ratios Effects on Forming Limit Diagrams,” Journal of Material Processing Technology 132(1-3):95-101, 2003.
- Riahi, M. and Amini, A., “Effect of Different Combinations of Tailor-Welded Blank Coupled with Change in Weld Location on Mechanical Properties by Laser Welding,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 67(5-8):1937-1945, 2013.