This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Human Shoulder Response to High Velocity Lateral Impact
Published November 13, 2017 by The Stapp Association in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
The armies of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization need a shoulder injury criterion for the EuroSID-2re dummy that must be reliable over a large range of loading conditions, from high velocity, short duration impacts (28 m/s - 3 ms) to low velocity long, duration impacts (4 m/s - 50 ms). In the literature, the human shoulder response to lateral impact was investigated at bounds of the loading condition spectrum as previously mentioned. For the low velocities, the injuries were mainly clavicle fractures and the maximum compression between the acromion and the sternum (Cmax) was proposed as an injury criterion. For the high velocities, the typical injury was humerus fractures, including a crushed humeral head.
The present study investigates the human shoulder response at an intermediate loading condition (14 m/s - 9 ms). Six lateral shoulder impact tests have been performed with three Post Mortem Human Subjects using a rigid impactor. The duration of the impact was controlled by means of an aluminum honeycomb that decelerated the impactor during the impact.
The shoulder external deflection (impactor-to-sternum) ranged between 40 to 64 mm and the applied forces ranged from 4.3 kN to 8 kN. Four shoulders out of six sustained AIS2 injuries. Two acromio-clavicular joint dislocations, one clavicle fracture, and one scapula fracture were observed.
Though the shoulder force responses were closer to those induced by the high velocity, short duration impacts, the injury patterns resembled those observed for low velocity, long duration loading conditions. Furthermore, the estimated acromion-to-sternum deflection values were not inconsistent with the prediction of the shoulder injury risk curve of the literature. Despite the relatively high-velocity impact (14.3 m/s), the shoulder injury mechanism appeared to be similar to those observed in the automotive field.
CitationLebarbé, M., Vezin, P., Rongiéras, F., and Lafont, D., "Human Shoulder Response to High Velocity Lateral Impact," SAE Technical Paper 2017-22-0002, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4271/2017-22-0002.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 3]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 4]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 5]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 6]|
- Bolte IV J H, Hines M H, Mc Fadden J D, Saul R A, Shoulder response characteristics and injury due to lateral glenohumeral joint impacts, Stapp Car Crash Journal, 44:261-280, 2000.
- Bolte IV J H, Hines M H, Herriott R G, Mc Fadden J D, Donnelly B R, Shoulder impact response and injury due to lateral and oblique loading, Stapp Car Crash Journal, 47:35-53, 2003.
- Compigne S, Caire Y, Quesnel T, and Verries J-P, Non-injurious and injurious impact response of the human shoulder three dimensional analysis of kinematics and determination of injury threshold, Stapp Car Crash Journal, 48:89-123, 2004.
- Henderson K A, Bailey A M, Christopher J J, Brozoski F, and Salzar R S, Biomechanical Response of the Lower Leg under High Rate Loading, IRCOBI Conference Proceeding, paper number IRC-13-24, pp. 145-157, 2013.
- Koh S W, Cavanaugh J M, Zhu J, Injury and Response of the Shoulder in Lateral Sled Tests, Stapp Car Crash Journal, 45:101-141, 2001.
- Koh S W, Cavanaugh J M, Mason M J, Petersen S A, Marth D R, Rouhana S W, Bolte IV J H, Shoulder Injury and Response Due to Lateral Glenohumeral Joint Impact: An Analysis of Combined Data, Stapp Car Crash Journal, 49:291-322, 2005.
- Lebarbé M, Lafont D, Uriot J, Potier P, Baudrit P, and Vallencien G, Study of the Shoulder Response to a High Speed– Short Displacement Lateral Impact using Post Mortem Human Subjects and ES-2re dummy, Proceedings of IRCOBI Conference, 2013.
- Lebarbé M, Petitjean A, Baudrit P, Lafont D, Protection of armored vehicle occupants – Towards a new shoulder injury criterion adapted to the dynamics of lateral IED blasts, Proceedings of PASS (Personal Aromred System Symposium), 2014.
- STANAG 4569, “Protection levels for occupants of logistic and light armoured vehicles”, Edition 1, NATO, 24 May 2004.
- RTO Technical Report HFM-090, "Test Methodology for Protection of Vehicle Occupants against Anti-Vehicular Landmine Effects. Final Report of HFM-090 Task Group 25". Internet: [http://www.cso.nato.int/abstracts.aspx], April 2007.
- RTO Technical Report HFM-148, "Test Methodology for Protection of Vehicle Occupants against Anti-Vehicular Landmine and/or IED Effects. Final Report of HFM-148". Internet: [http://www.cso.nato.int/abstracts.aspx], May 2012.