This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
A Fixed-quantity Indicator to Replace Display Annoyance in an Indirect Field of Vision
Technical Paper
2017-01-1370
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
This content contains downloadable datasets
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
Driving is an action that depends strongly on visual information. For displays in the cockpit, a combination of “ease of viewing” to inform the driver of danger early and “annoyance reduction” to avoid drops in the driver’s perception is needed. In this study, we tried to capture “ease of viewing” and “annoyance” in one fixed-quantity indicator. We took up a Camera Monitor System (CMS) as the subject and analyzed the effect that annoyance with the display used in CMSs has on driving behavior. Based on our analysis, we hypothesize that evaluating carelessness in viewing behavior is related evaluating to annoyance. Next, we chose a Detection Response Task (DRT) technique as a method to evaluate driving behavior influenced by this annoyance. We defined the “event detection rate” as a fixed-quantity indicator that takes account of the indirect field of vision provided by the CMS, and applied this indicator to evaluating an electronic rearview mirror and showed that it was effective as a method to measure ease of viewing. At the same time, we showed that the indicator could replace display annoyance after confirming the relationship between passed over events and display annoyance.
Recommended Content
Authors
Topic
Citation
Hara, H., Kawauchi, M., Katayama, M., and Iwamori, N., "A Fixed-quantity Indicator to Replace Display Annoyance in an Indirect Field of Vision," SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-1370, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4271/2017-01-1370.Data Sets - Support Documents
Title | Description | Download |
---|---|---|
Unnamed Dataset 1 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 2 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 3 |
Also In
References
- United Nations Regulation No. 46, E/ECE/324/Rev.1/Add.45/Rev.5, Uniform provisions concerning the approval of devices for indirect vision and of motor vehicles with regard to the installation of these devices 2013 http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/main/wp29/wp29regs/2013/R046r5e.pdf 22 Sept 2016
- International Organization for Standardization ISO 16505: 2015 Road vehicles - Ergonomic and performance aspects of Camera Monitor Systems - Requirements and test procedures 2015
- Terzis A. et al. Handbook of Camera Monitor Systems: The Automotive Mirror-Replacement Technology based on ISO 16505 (Augmented Vision and Reality) 2016
- Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 49 CFR Part 571, [Docket No. NHTSA-2010-0162], Federal Motor Vehicle Standards, Rear Visibility, Final Rule 2014 http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2014-04-07/pdf/2014-07469.pdf 22 Sept 2016
- Inuzuka Y. et al. Visibility of Head Up Displays (HUD) for Automobiles Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 35th Annual Meeting 1574 1578 1991
- Harman E. Driver Vision Requirements, Society of Automotive Engineers Technical Paper Series, 700392 692 630 1970
- Sakai H. et al. Is the useful field of view a good predictor of at-fault crash risk in elderly Japanese drivers? Geriatrics & Gerontology International 1 7 2014 10.1111/ggi.12328
- Kobayashi Y. Study on the reduction of the discomfort feeling arising from information on local motion on peripheral vision Master's thesis Yokohama National Univ. 2011
- Uno H. Contributions of Drivers' Behavioral Researches on Active Safety Improvements IATSS Review 36 1 24 32 2011
- International Organization for Standardization ISO/DIS 17488: Draft Road vehicles - Transport information and control systems - Detection-Response Task (DRT) for assessing attentional effects of cognitive load in driving 2015
- Marie-Pierre B. Sensitivity of detection response task (DRT) to the driving demand and task difficulty Proceedings of the Seventh International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle design 64 70 2013
- Harms L. Peripheral detection as a measurement of driver distraction - A study of memory-based versus system-based navigation in a build-up area Transportation Research Part F 6 23 36 2003