This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Common Mesh Approach for Automotive Vehicle CAE Analysis
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published March 28, 2017 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Over the past decades, Computer Aided Engineering (CAE) based assessment of vehicle durability, NVH (Noise, Vibration and Harshness) and crash performance has become very essential in vehicle development and verification process. CAE activity is often organized as different groups based on the specific attributes (durability, NVH and crash). Main reasons for this are the expertise required and the difference in the finite element software technologies (explicit vs implicit) used to perform and interpret various CAE analyses in each of the attributes. This leads to individual attribute team creating its own model of the vehicle and there is not much exchange of the CAE models between the attribute teams. Different model requirements for each attribute make model sharing challenging. However, CAE analyses for all attributes start with common CAD and follow the same sub-process in vehicle development cycle. This provides an opportunity to save resources if all attributes could use the same mesh in their respective model. Further process efficiency improvement can be achieved by eliminating the need to reconcile each attribute mesh to the common design level for multi-disciplinary design optimization (MDO).
- Ligong Pan - Ford Motor Company
- Seung Hyun Jung - Ford Motor Company
- Sushanth Ramavath - Ford Motor Company
- Mohamed El-Essawi - Ford Motor Company
- Randall Frank - Ford Motor Company
- Jiawei Qin - Ford Motor Company
- Ramarajan Ilankamban - Ford Motor Company
- Yuan Yao - Ford Motor Company
- Homa Torab - Ford Motor Company
- Yuzhao Song - Ford Motor Company
- Jim Alanoly - Ford Motor Company
CitationPan, L., Jung, S., Ramavath, S., El-Essawi, M. et al., "Common Mesh Approach for Automotive Vehicle CAE Analysis," SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-0375, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4271/2017-01-0375.
- Jankowski U. , Nösner N. , Sans M. Model Sizes in Implicit and Explicit Calculations LS-DYNA Anwenderforum Ulm 2006
- Ahn C. N. , Dr. Kang B. S. , Kim Y. D. , Seo M. G. , Jang D. Y. One-Model One-Solver Methodology on Structural Analysis NAFEMS World Congress 2013
- Tierney , C. , Nolan , D. , Robinson , T. , & Armstrong , C. 2015 Using mesh-geometry relationships to transfer analysis models between CAE tools Engineering With Computers 31 3 465 481
- B.Tech. (Hons.) Michael Fairchild Tecosim Ltd, Dipl.-Ing. Udo Jankowski, Dipl.-Ing. Manfred Sans, Tecosim GmbH General considerations for the influence of mesh density in Ls Dyna 2005 5th European LS-DYNA User Conference
- Bois Paul Du Quality Requirements for FE-models in Crashworthiness special reference to RADIOSS FE-code Altair
- Kuratani , F. , Matsubara , K. , and Yamauchi , T. Finite Element Model for Spot Welds Using Multi-Point Constraints and its Dynamic Characteristics SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars - Mech. Syst. 4 2 1311 1319 2011 10.4271/2011-01-1697