This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Multi-Objective Tolerance Optimization Considering Friction Loss for Internal Combustion Engines
Technical Paper
2017-01-0250
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
This content contains downloadable datasets
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
Manufacturing of the internal combustion engines (ICEs) has very critical requirements on the precision and tolerance of engine parts in order to guarantee the engine performance. As a typical complex nonlinear system, small changes in dimensions of ICE components may have great impact on the performance and cost of the manufacturing of ICES. In this regard, it is still necessary to discuss the optimization of the tolerance and manufacturing precision of the critical components of ICEs even though the tolerance optimization in general has been reported in the literature. A systematic process for determining optimal tolerances will overcome the disadvantages of the traditional experience-based tolerance design and therefore improve the system performance. A novel multi-objective tolerance design optimization problem considering the friction loss in two important systems, the piston and the crankshaft, is proposed and solved in this work, since nearly 70% mechanical loss of an engine is caused by the piston and the crankshaft systems and friction loss is an important factor to affect the performance of the ICEs. The simulation models of the piston and crankshaft system are built using AVL Excite Piston & Ring® and Power Unit®, respectively. An analysis model used in the optimization is set up using the Gaussian Process with the corresponding simulation data. Finally, the multi-objective tolerance design optimization problem is formulated and solved using a newly developed sequential multi-objective optimization (S-MOO) method.
Recommended Content
Authors
Citation
Zhang, J., Zhou, J., LI, M., and Xu, M., "Multi-Objective Tolerance Optimization Considering Friction Loss for Internal Combustion Engines," SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-0250, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4271/2017-01-0250.Data Sets - Support Documents
Title | Description | Download |
---|---|---|
Unnamed Dataset 1 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 2 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 3 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 4 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 5 |
Also In
References
- Speckhart , F. H. Calculation of Tolerance Based on A Minimum Cost Approach Journal of the Engineering Industry 94 2 447 453 1972
- Spotts , M. F. Allocation of Tolerances to Minimize Cost of Assembly Journal of the Engineering Industry 762 764 1973
- Michael , W. , and Siddall J. N. 1981 Optimization Problem with Tolerance Assignment and Full Acceptance Journal of Mechanical Design 103 842 848 1981
- Chase , K. W. , Greenwood , W. H. , Loosli , B. G. , and Hauglund L. F. , Least Cost Tolerance Allocation for Mechanical Assemblies with Automated Process Selection Manufacturing Review 3 1 49 59 1990
- Wua Chin-Chung , Chenb Zhuoning , Tanga Geo-Ry Component tolerance design for minimum quality loss and manufacturing cost Computers in Industry 35 3 223 232 1998
- Li , M. Quality Loss Function Based Manufacturing Process Setting Models for Unbalanced Tolerance Design The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 16 1 39 45 2000
- Long , Z. Research on Correlation between Manufacturing Precision and Engine Friction Performance Shanghai Jiaotong University Master thesis 2013
- Box , G. E. P. , and Wilson , K.B. On the Experimental Attainment of Optimum Conditions Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 13 1 1 15 1951
- Sacks , J. , Welch , W. J. , Mitchell , T. J. , and Wynn , H. P. Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments Statistical Science 4 4 409 423 1989
- Kennedy , M. C. , and O'Hagan , A. Bayesian calibration of computer models Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B 63 3 425 464 2001
- Iman , R.L. , Helton , J.C. , Campbell , J.E. An approach to sensitivity analysis of computer models, Part 1. Introduction, input variable selection and preliminary variable assessment Journal of Quality Technology 13 3 174 183 1981
- Allen D. M. The relationship between variable selection and data augmentation and a method for prediction Technometrics 16 1 125 127 1974
- Conti , S. , and O'Hagan , A. Bayesian Emulation of Complex Multi-Output and Dynamic Computer Models Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 140 3 640 651 2010
- Zhou J , Li M , Xu M A Novel Sequential Multi-Objective Optimization Using Anchor Points in the Design Space of Global Variables ASME. J. Mech. Des. 2016 10.1115/1.4034671