This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.

Review: Fuel Volatility Standards and Spark-Ignition Vehicle Driveability

Journal Article
2016-01-9072
ISSN: 1946-3952, e-ISSN: 1946-3960
Published March 14, 2016 by SAE International in United States
Review: Fuel Volatility Standards and Spark-Ignition Vehicle Driveability
Sector:
Citation: Yanowitz, J. and McCormick, R., "Review: Fuel Volatility Standards and Spark-Ignition Vehicle Driveability," SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 9(2):408-429, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-9072.
Language: English

Abstract:

Spark-ignition engine fuel standards have been put in place to ensure acceptable hot and cold weather driveability (HWD and CWD). Vehicle manufacturers and fuel suppliers have developed systems that meet our driveability requirements so effectively that drivers overwhelmingly find that their vehicles reliably start up and operate smoothly and consistently throughout the year. For HWD, fuels that are too volatile perform more poorly than those that are less volatile. Vapor lock is the apparent cause of poor HWD, but there is conflicting evidence in the literature as to where in the fuel system it occurs. Most studies have found a correlation between degraded driveability and higher dry vapor pressure equivalent or lower TV/L = 20, and less consistently with a minimum T50. For CWD, fuels with inadequate volatility can cause difficulty in starting and rough operation during engine warmup. The Driveability Index (DI)-a function of T10, T50, and T90-is well correlated with CWD in hydrocarbon fuels. For ethanol-containing fuels, a correction factor to the DI equation improves the correlation with CWD, although the best value for that factor has still not been determined. Ethanol increases the heat of vaporization. However, this is likely insignificant for E15 and lower concentration fuels. The impact of ethanol on driveability is likely due to its direct effect on vapor pressure at cold temperatures. For E51-E83 or flex-fuel blends, ASTM sets a minimum vapor pressure; however, published data suggest that a correction for the amount of ethanol in the fuel is needed to accurately predict CWD, possibly because ethanol has a higher lower-flammability limit.