This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
A Methodology for Prediction of Periprosthetic Injuries in Occupants with TKR Implants in Vehicle Crashes
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 05, 2016 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Periprosthetic fractures refer to the fractures that occur in the vicinity of the implants of joint replacement arthroplasty. Most of the fractures during an automotive frontal collision involve the long bones of the lower limbs (femur and tibia). Since the prevalence of persons living with lower limb joint prostheses is increasing, periprosthetic fractures that occur during vehicular accidents are likely to become a considerable burden on health care systems. It is estimated that approximately 4.0 million adults in the U.S. currently live with Total Knee Replacement (TKR) implants. Therefore, it is essential to study the injury patterns that occur in the long bone of a lower limb containing a total knee prosthesis. The aim of the present study is to develop an advanced finite element model that simulates the possible fracture patterns that are likely during vehicular accidents involving occupants who have knee joint prostheses in situ. Initially, an NCAP test simulation is carried out for a compact passenger car (Dodge Neon) with a belted Hybrid 3 dummy in the driver's seat. The femoral load history of the left leg is correlated with the NCAP test result. An equivalent sub-system model for the NCAP test simulation is then created by isolating the left legform of the Hybrid 3 dummy and impacting the same against a relevant portion of the instrument panel of the Dodge Neon model. A similar model is then formulated by replacing the legform of the Hybrid 3 dummy with a validated finite element model of a human-like legform with actual human tissue properties assigned to it. Later, the same setup is used for assessing the effect of incorporating a TKR into the human-like knee model. The femoral loads obtained from the sub-system level analyses are compared and it is noticed that there is a successive drop in peak femoral load in the intact human-like and TKR-implanted legforms relative to the peak load in the legform of the Hybrid 3 dummy. The said reductions in loads in the more representative models of a human leg have been found to be due to damages in the inter- and supra-condylar regions of the femoral bone. It is also noted that the magnitude of peak load obtained with the TKR implanted legform is lower than that obtained with the intact knee legform. This reduction in peak load is due to the relatively early initiation of damage that is caused due to reduced amount of high density cortical bone following the TKR. The higher susceptibility of a TKR-implanted knee to bone fracture in a frontal crash scenario as compared to a normal human knee has been brought into focus perhaps for the first time in the current study.
|Technical Paper||Evaluating Knee-to-Instrument Panel Impacts|
|Technical Paper||Factors Influencing Knee Restraint|
|Technical Paper||A Crash Simulation of Instrument Panel Knee Bolster Using Hybrid III Dummy Lower Torso|
CitationSrinivas, G., Deb, A., Chou, C., and Kumar, M., "A Methodology for Prediction of Periprosthetic Injuries in Occupants with TKR Implants in Vehicle Crashes," SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-1529, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-1529.
- Phil McGraw, Kumar A. Periprosthetic fractures of the femur after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Traumatol 2010 Sep; 11(3): 135-141.
- Rorabeck C.H, Taylor JW. Periprosthetic fractures of the femur complication total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 1999; 30: 265-77.
- Parvizi J, Jain N, Schmidt AH. Periprosthetic knee fractures . J Orthop Trauma. 2008; 22: 663-71.
- Althausen P.L, Lee M.A, Finkemeir CG, Meehan JP Rodrigo JJ. Operative stabilization of supracondylar femur fractures above total knee Arthroplasty. A comparison of four treatment methods. J Arthroplasty 2003; 18: 834-9.
- Giannoudis P.V, Kanakaris NK, Tsiridis E. Principles of inter nal fixation and selection of implants for periprosthetic femoral fractures Injury 2007; 38: 669-87.
- Zdero R, Walker R, Waddell J.P, Schemitsch E.H. Biomech anical evaluation of periprosthetic femoral fracture fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90: 1068-77.
- Herrera D.A, Kregor P.J, Cole P.A, Levy B.A, Jönsson A, Zl ow-dzki M. Treatment of acute distal femur fractures above a total knee arthroplasty: Systematic review of 145 cases (1981-2006) Acta Orthop. 2008; 79:22.
- Delport P.H, Van Audekercke R, Martens M, Mulier JC. Con servative treatment of ipsilateral supracondylar femoral fracture after total knee arthroplasty. J Trauma 1984; 24: 846-9.
- Figgie M, Goldberg M, Figgie H.E, Sobel M. The results of treatment of supracondylar fracture above total knee arthroplasty J Arthroplasty 1990; 5: 267-276.
- Cordeiro E.N, Costa R.C, Carazzato J.G, Silva JDS. Periprosthetic fractures in patients with total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop 1990; 252: 182-189.
- Zalzal P et al. Notching of the Anterior Femoral Cortex During Total Knee Arthroplasty The Journal of Arthroplasty 2006; Vol. 21 No. 5.
- Miles B et al. Subject specific finite element modeling of periprosthetic femoral fracture using element deactivation to simulate bone failure. Medical Engineering and Physics 2015; 37: 567-573.
- Noureddine A, Eskandarian A and Diggs K. Computer modeling and validation of a Hybrid III Dummy for crashworthiness simulation. Mathematical and computer modeling 2002; 35: 885-893.
- Stanley H. Backaitis and Harlod J. Mertz. HYBRID 3: The first human-like crash test dummy. 1994 SAE
- Bayraktar et al. Comparision of the elastic and yield properties of human femoral tracebular and cortical bone tissue. Journal of bio-mechanics 2004; 37: 27-35.
- Ulrich et al. The effect of strain rate on the mechanical properties of human cortical bone. Journal of bio-mechanical engineering 2008; 130.
- Untaroiu “A finite element model of the lower limb for simulating pedestrian impacts” stapp car crash 2005.
- Takahashi et al. Development and validation of the finite element model for the human lower limb of the pedestrains. 44th stapp car crash conference proceedings. 2000; 44:335-355.
- Haraldsson et al. Region specific mechanical properties of the human patella tendon. J Appl physiol 2005; 98:1006-1012.
- Johnson et al. Tensile and viscoelastic properties of human patella tendon. Journal of orthopaedic research 1994; 12:796-803.
- Deneweth J.M, Arruda E.M, Mclean S.G. Hyperelastic modeling of location-dependent human distal femoral cartilage mechanics. International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics 2015; 68:146-156.
- Butler D.L, Kay M.D, Stouffer D.C. Comparison of material properties in fascicle-bone units from human patellar tendon and knee ligaments. Journal of Biomechanics, 1986; 19: 425-432.
- Abraham et al. Hyperelastic properties of human meniscal attachments. Journal of bio-mechanics 2011; 44:413-418.
- Naravane A, Deb A. Validation of a hybrid III dummy model and its application in simulation of vehicle frontal NCAP tests. Altair CAE Users Conference 2005.
- Kuppa S, Rupp J, Schneider L. Knee-Thigh-Hip Injuries and Knee/Femur compliance of the Hybrid III, Thor-Lx, and Human cadavers. http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov.
- Rastogi S, Wild B.R, Duthie R.B. Biomechanical aspects of femoral fractures in automobile accidents. The Journal of bone and joint surgery.1986;68-B; 5.
- New car assessment program (NCAP), frontal barrier Impact test of a 1996 Dodge Neon 4 door sedan, NHTSA No. MT0301.
- Marzougui D, Kan C.D, Bedewi N.E. Development and validation of an NCAP simulation using LS-DYNA3D. FHWA/NHTSA National Crash Analysis Center The George Washington University, USA.
- Rupp J.D, Miller C.S, Reed M.P, Madura N.H, Ritchie N.L, Schneider L.W. Characterization of knee impacts in frontal crashes., weblink : www.sensorprod.com/news/white-papers/cki/wp_cki.pdf United states paper 07-0345.
- Schmitt K.U, Niederer P.F, Cronin D.S, Muser M.H, Walz F. Trauma Biomechanics: An Introduction to Injury Biomechanics. Springer 4th edition ISBN 978-642-53919-0.