This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Techno-Economic Analysis of Solar Hybrid Vehicles Part 2: Comparative Analysis of Economic, Environmental, and Usability Benefits
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 05, 2016 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Introducing effective technologies to reduce carbon emissions in the transport sector is a critical issue for automotive manufacturers to contribute to sustainable development. Unlike the plug-in electric vehicles (PEVs), whose effectiveness is dependent on the carbon intensity of grid electricity, the solar hybrid vehicle (SHV) can be an alternative electric vehicle because of its off-grid, zero-emission electric technology. Its usability is also advantageous because it does not require manual charging by the users. This study aims at evaluating the economic, environmental, and usability benefits of SHV by comparing it with other types of vehicles including PEVs. By setting cost and energy efficiency on the basis of the assumed technology level in 2030, annual cost and annual CO2 emissions of each vehicle are calculated using the daily mileage pattern obtained from a user survey of 5,000 people in Japan and the daily radiation data for each corresponding user. We develop a linear programming model to determine the optimal vehicle mix for these users that minimizes the total cost or total CO2 emissions. Incorporating carbon cost and usability cost, which represent the inconvenience of frequent charging for users in the model, we also investigate the balanced solutions between economic, environmental, and usability benefits. The results show SHV as one of the most cost-effective vehicles for CO2 reduction after the plug-in hybrid vehicle with small battery for a wide range of users. Sensitivity analysis on the initial settings shows the importance of technological development in achieving the target.
CitationHara, T., Shiga, T., Kimura, K., and Sato, A., "Techno-Economic Analysis of Solar Hybrid Vehicles Part 2: Comparative Analysis of Economic, Environmental, and Usability Benefits," SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-1286, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-1286.
- International Energy Agency CO 2 emissions from fuel combustion Highlights 2014 edition https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/CO2EmissionsFromFuelCombustionHighlights2014.pdf 2014 Oct. 2015
- Huo , H. , Zhang , Q. , Wang , M. , Streets , D. et al. Environmental Implication of Electric Vehicles in China Environmental Science & Technology 44 4856 4861 2010 10.1021/es100520c
- U.S. Energy Information Administration Annual Energy Outlook 2015 http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/ Oct. 2015
- Argonne National Laboratory GREET 1 and GREET 2 2014 https://greet.es.anl.gov/ Oct. 2015
- Imamura , E. , and Nagano , K. Evaluation of Life Cycle CO 2 Emissions of Power Generation Technologies - Update for State-of-the-art Plants Socio-economic Research Center, Report No. Y09027 Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry 2010
- Kimura , K. , Kudo , Y. , and Sato , A. Techno-Economic Analysis of Solar Hybrid Vehicles Part 1: Analysis of Solar Hybrid Vehicle Potential Considering Well-to-Wheel GHG Emissions SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-1287 2016
- Mizuho Information & Research Institute, Inc. Investigation research on life cycle assessment of photovoltaic power generation system New Energy and Industrial Development Organization (NEDO) Research report 2009
- Hara , T. A Variety of Near-Optimal Solutions in the Vehicle Mix Optimization Model International Energy Workshop 2014 China June 4-6, 2014
- Naucler , T. and Enkvist , P. Pathways to a Low-Carbon Economy - Version 2 of the Global Greenhouse Gas Abatement Cost Curve McKinsey & Company 2009 http://www.mckinsey.com/client_service/sustainability/latest_thinking/pathways_to_a_low_carbon_economy Oct. 2015
- Ekins , Paul , Kesicki , F. and Smith , A. Marginal Abatement Cost Curves: A call for caution UCL Energy Institute 2011 http://www.greenpeace.org.uk/media/reports/ucl-energy-institute-report-marginal-abatement-cost-curves-call-caution Oct 2015