This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Gaseous and Particulate Emissions from a Waste Hauler Equipped with a Stoichiometric Natural Gas Engine on Different Fuel Compositions
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 05, 2016 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
We assessed gaseous and particulate matter (PM) emissions from a current technology stoichiometric natural gas waste hauler equipped with a 2011 model year 8.9L Cummins Westport ISL-G engine with cooled exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) and three-way catalyst (TWC). Testing was performed on five fuels with varying Wobbe and methane numbers over the William H. Martin Refuse Truck Cycle. The results showed lower nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions for the low methane fuels (i.e., natural gas fuels with a relatively low methane content) for the transport and curbside cycles. Total hydrocarbon (THC) and methane (CH4) emissions did not show any consistent fuel trends. Non-methane hydrocarbon (NMHC) emissions showed a trend of higher emissions for the fuels containing higher levels of NMHCs. Carbon monoxide (CO) emissions showed a trend of higher emissions for the low methane fuels. The low methane fuels generally showed higher fuel economy on a volumetric basis compared to the higher methane number fuels. Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions did not show any statistically significant trends for either the transport or curbside cycles, but did show some reductions for some fuels for the compaction cycle. PM mass emissions were very low and there were no statistically significant differences between the fuels. Particle number emissions did not show strong fuel trends for the different RTC segments, with some exceptions. Results of the particle size distribution revealed bimodal size distribution profiles for all fuels, with a predominant nucleation mode centered from 9 to11 nm size range. Ammonia emissions showed a trend of higher emissions for the low methane fuels. Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions were higher with the low methane fuels. Formaldehyde emissions did not show any statistically significant fuel trends, while acetaldehyde emissions were at or below the background levels for most of the test fuels.
- George Karavalakis - University of California, Riverside
- Yu Jiang - University of California, Riverside
- Jiacheng Yang - University of California, Riverside
- Maryam Hajbabaei - University of California, Riverside
- Kent Johnson - University of California, Riverside
- Thomas Durbin - University of California, Riverside
CitationKaravalakis, G., Jiang, Y., Yang, J., Hajbabaei, M. et al., "Gaseous and Particulate Emissions from a Waste Hauler Equipped with a Stoichiometric Natural Gas Engine on Different Fuel Compositions," SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-0799, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-0799.
- Maimoun, M.A., Reinhart, D.R., Gammoh, F.T., Mcauley Bush, P., “Emissions from US waste collection vehicles,” Waste Management 33: 1079-1089, 2013.
- USEPA, Modeling and Inventories (MOVESa). USEPA, August 22, 2011. http://www.epa.gov/otaq/models/moves/index.htm
- Farzaneh, M., Zietsman, J., Lee, D.-W., “Evaluation of in-use emissions from refuse trucks,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2123: 38-45, 2009.
- Fontaras, G., Martini, G., Manfredi, U., Marotta, A., Krasenbrink, A., Maffioletti, F., Terenghi, R., Colombo, M., “Assessment of on-road emissions of four Euro V diesel and CNG waste collection trucks for supporting air-quality improvement initiatives in the City of Milan,” Science of the Total Environment 426, 65-72, 2012.
- Walkowicz, K., Proc, K., Wayne, S., Nine, R. et al., "Chassis Dynamometer Emission Measurements from Refuse Trucks Using Dual-Fuel™ Natural Gas Engines," SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-3366, 2003, doi:10.4271/2003-01-3366.
- Curran, S.J., Wagner, R.M., Graves, R.L., Keller, M., Green, J.B. Jr., “Well-to-wheel analysis of direct and indirect use of natural gas in passenger vehicles,” Energy 75: 194-203, 2014.
- CNG Bus Emissions Roadmap: from Euro III to Euro VI. The International Council on Clean Transportation, 2009, http://www.theicct.org/sites/default/files/publications/CNGbuses_dec09.pdf.
- McTaggart-Cowan, G.P., Reynolds, C.C.O., Bushe, W.K., “Natural gas fuelling for heavy-duty on-road use: current trends and future direction,” International Journal of Environmental Studies 63: 421-440, 2006.
- Einewall, P., Tunestål, P., and Johansson, B., "Lean Burn Natural Gas Operation vs. Stoichiometric Operation with EGR and a Three Way Catalyst," SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-0250, 2005, doi:10.4271/2005-01-0250.
- Yoon, S., Collins, J., Thiruvengadam, A., Gautam, M., Herner, J., Ayala, A., “Criteria pollutant and greenhouse gas emissions from CNG transit buses equipped with three-way catalysts compared to lean-burn engines and oxidation catalyst technologies,” Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association 63: 926-933, 2013.
- Karavalakis, G., Durbin,T.D., Villela, M., Miller, J.W., “Air pollutant emissions of light-duty vehicles operating on various natural gas compositions,” Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering 4: 8-16, 2012.
- McTaggart-Cowan, G.P., Rogak, S.N., Munshi, S.R., Hill, P.G., Bushe, W.K., “The influence of fuel composition on a heavy-duty, natural-gas direct-injection engine,” Fuel 89: 752-759, 2010.
- Gutierrez, J.H., Saldivar, A.R., Mora, J.R., “LNG Research Study - Phase 1. Testing of a Natural Gas Compressor Engine,” Report by the Southern California gas Company, October 2003. 2003.
- Graboski, M., McCormick, R., Newlin, A., Dunnuck, D. et al., "Effect of Fuel Composition and Altitude on Regulated Emissions from a Lean-Burn, Closed Loop Controlled Natural Gas Engine," SAE Technical Paper 971707, 1997, doi:10.4271/971707.
- Min, B.H., Chung, J.T., Kim, H.Y., Park, S., “Effects of gas composition on the performance and emissions of compressed natural gas engines,” KSME International Journal 16: 219-226, 2002.
- Karavalakis, G., Hajbabaei, M., Durbin, T.D., Johnson, K.C., Zheng, Z., Miller, W.J., “The effect of natural gas composition on the regulated emissions, gaseous toxic pollutants, and ultrafine particle number emissions from a refuse hauler vehicle,” Energy 50: 280-291, 2013.
- Hajbabaei, M., Karavalakis, G., Johnson, K.C., Lee, L., Durbin, T.D., “Impact of natural gas fuel composition on criteria, toxic, and particle emissions from transit buses equipped with lean burn and stoichiometric engines,” Energy 62: 425-434, 2013.
- Feist, M., Landau, M., and Harte, E., "The Effect of Fuel Composition on Performance and Emissions of a Variety of Natural Gas Engines," SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 3(2):100-117, 2010, doi:10.4271/2010-01-1476.
- Feist, M.D., “Fuel Composition Testing using DDC Series 50G Natural Gas Engines,” Final report prepared by Southwest Research Institute for the Southern California Gas Company, Report No. 11657, August 2006.
- Feist, M.D., “Fuel Composition Testing using Cummins, John Deere, and Detroit Diesel Natural Gas Engines,” Final report prepared by Southwest Research Institute for the Southern California Gas Company, Report No. 03.13721, April 2009.
- NGC+ Interchangeability Work Group. White Paper on Natural Gas Interchangeability and Non-Combustion End Use. 2005.
- NGC+ Liquid Hydrocarbon Drop Out Task Group. White Paper on Liquid Hydrocarbon Drop Out in Natural Gas Infrastructure. 2005.
- Cocker, D.R., Shah, S., Johnson, K., Miller, J.W., Norbeck, J., “Development and application of a mobile laboratory for measuring emissions from diesel engines. I regulated gaseous emissions,” Environ Sci Technol 38: 2182-2189, 2004.
- Amanatidis, S., Ntziachristos, L., Giechaskiel, B., Katsaounis, D., et al., “Evaluation of an Oxidation Catalyst (“Catalytic Stripper”) in Eliminating Volatile Material from Combustion Aerosol”, Journal of Aerosol Science 57:144-155, 2013.
- Chiu, J., Taylor, J., Tai, C., Reppert, T. et al., "US 2010 Emissions Capable Camless Heavy-Duty On-Highway Natural Gas Engine," SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-1930, 2007, doi:10.4271/2007-01-1930.
- Defoort, M., Olsen, D., Willson, B., “The effect of air-fuel ratio control strategies on nitrogen compound formation in three-way catalysts,” International Journal of Engine Research 5: 115-122, 2003.
- Lelieveld, J., Lechtenbohmer, S., Assonov, S.S., Brenninkmeijer, C.A.M., Dienst, C., et al., “Low methane leakage from gas pipelines”, Nature 434: 841-842, 2005.
- Allen, D.T. “Methane emissions from natural gas production and use: reconciling bottom-up and top-down measurements”, Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering 5: 78-83, 2014.
- Myhre, G., Shindell, D., Bréon, F.M., Collins, W., Fuglestvedt J., Huang, J., et al., Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing. In: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Stocker, T.F., Qin, D., Plattner, GK., Tignor, M., Allen, S.K., Boschung, J., et al., (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 2013.
- Wallington, T.J., Wiesen, P., “N2O emissions from global transportation,” Atmospheric Environment 94: 258-263, 2014.
- Gong, J. and Rutland, C., "Three Way Catalyst Modeling with Ammonia and Nitrous Oxide Kinetics for a Lean Burn Spark Ignition Direct Injection (SIDI) Gasoline Engine," SAE Technical Paper 2013-01-1572, 2013, doi:10.4271/2013-01-1572.
- Dasch, J.M., “Nitrous oxides from vehicles,” Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association 42: 63-67, 1992.
- Behrentz, E., Ling, R., Rieger, P., Winer, A.M., “Measurements of nitrous oxides emissions from light-duty motor vehicles: a pilot study,” Atmospheric Environment 38: 4291-4303, 2004.
- Bielaczyc, P., Szczotka, A., Swiatek, A., and Woodburn, J., "A Comparison of Ammonia Emission Factors from Light-Duty Vehicles Operating on Gasoline, Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) and Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)," SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 5(2):751-759, 2012, doi:10.4271/2012-01-1095.
- Mejia-Centeno, I., Martinez-Hernadez, A., Fuentes, G.A., “Effect of low-sulfur fuels upon NH3 and N2O emission during operation of commercial three-way catalytic converters,” Topics in Catalysis 42-43: 381-385, 2007.
- Huai, T., Durbin, T., Miller, J., Pisano, J., Sauer, C., Rhee, S.H., Norbeck, J.M., “Investigation of NH3 emissions from new technology vehicles as a function of vehicle operating conditions,” Environ Sci Technol 37: 4841-4847, 2003.
- Shelef, M., Gandhi, H.S., “Ammonia Formation in the Catalytic Reduction of Nitric Oxide. III. The Role of Water Gas Shift, Reduction by Hydrocarbons, and Steam Reforming,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev. 13: 80-85, 1974.
- Yoon, S., Hu, S., Kado, N.Y., Thiruvengadam, A., Collins, J.F., Gautam, M., et al., “Chemical and toxicological properties of emissions from CNG transit buses equipped with three-way catalysts compared to lean-burn engines and oxidation catalyst technologies,” Atmospheric Environment 83: 220-228, 2014.
- Kado, N., Okomoto, R.A, Kuzmicky, P., Kobayashi, R., Ayala, A., “Emissions of toxic pollutants from compressed natural gas and low sulfur diesel-fueled heavy-duty transit buses tested over multiple driving cycles,” Environ Sci Technol 29: 7638-7649, 2008.
- Okomoto, R.A., Kado, N., Kuzmicky, P., Ayala, A., “Unregulated Emissions from Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) Transit Buses Configured with and without Oxidation Catalyst,” Environ Sci Technol 40: 332-341, 2006.
- Wang, W.G., Clark, N.N., Lyons, D.W., Yang, R.M., Gautam, M., et al., “Emissions comparisons from alternative fuel buses and diesel buses with chassis dynamometer. Environ Sci Technol 31: 3132-3137, 1997.
- Thiruvengadam, A., Besch, M.C., Yoon, S., Collins, J., Kappanna, H., Carder, D.K., et al., “Characterization of particulate matter emissions from a current technology natural gas engine,” Environ Sci Technol 48: 8235-8242, 2014.
- Holmen, B., Ayala A., “Ultrafine PM emissions from natural gas, oxidation catalyst diesel and particle trap diesel heavy-duty transit buses,” Environ Sci Technol 36: 5041-5050, 2002.
- Jayaratne, E., Meyer, N., Ristovski, Z., Morawska, L., “Volatile Properties of Particles Emitted by Compressed Natural Gas and Diesel Buses during Steady-State and Transient Driving Modes,” Environ Sci Technol 46:196-203, 2012.
- Abdul-Khalek, I., Kittelson, D., Graskow, B., Wei, Q. et al., "Diesel Exhaust Particle Size: Measurement Issues and Trends," SAE Technical Paper 980525, 1998, doi:10.4271/980525.