This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
A Study to Address the Failure Mechanism of the Conventional 3-Point Restraint in Protecting the Far Side Occupant in a Rollover Accident
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published January 14, 2015 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Occupant motion in a vehicle rollover accident is a function of many factors. Some important ones are vehicle kinematics, position of the occupant in the vehicle, occupant size, ground topology and restraint usage. The far side belted occupants are more vulnerable than the near side occupants in a rollover accident as they have more energy as a result of their trailing and higher side of the vehicle. This outcome is attributable to the inadequate safety performance of the conventional single loop; B-pillar mounted D-ring restraints. Roof crush tends to displace the vehicle's B-pillar, resulting in D-Ring displacement which causes slack in the lap portion of the restraint. This slack enables centrifugal loads to move the far side occupant further away from the vehicle's instantaneous point of rotation. In this scenario, the presence of any ejection portal can result in an occupant becoming partially or fully ejected.
The coupling technique is used between the Finite Element (FE) LS-DYNA and Multibody-MADYMO code to demonstrate the slack generation in the lap belt during vehicle roof to ground contact. The MADYMO FMVSS 208 driver side rollover simulation is conducted to compare and evaluate seat integrated restraints with the B-pillar mounted D-ring restraints. The head excursion is quantified and used as a response to compare the performance of these two types of restraints. The effectiveness of the buckle pretensioner in a rollover accident is also analyzed by comparing the performance of the restraint with and without the pretensioner.
This study is performed using occupant anthropometry from a real world accident involving a far side belted female occupant who was fully ejected. This study revealed the inadequate performance and failure of the conventional single loop restraint to prevent the far side occupant's excessive head excursion and ejection. This study also demonstrates the superior performance and added advantages of the seat integrated restraint with and without the buckle pretensioner over the B-pillar mounted D-ring restraint.
|Technical Paper||Development of a Computational Method to Predict Occupant Motions and Neck Loads During Rollovers|
|Technical Paper||Driver Injuries in US Single-Event Rollovers|
|Technical Paper||US and UK Field Rollover Characteristics|
CitationThorbole, C. and Deshpande, S., "A Study to Address the Failure Mechanism of the Conventional 3-Point Restraint in Protecting the Far Side Occupant in a Rollover Accident," SAE Technical Paper 2015-26-0161, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4271/2015-26-0161.
- Traffic Safety Facts, 2001-2005 NHTSA
- Pywell , J. , Rouhana , S. , McCleary , J. , and DeSaele , K. Characterization of Belt Restraint Systems in Quasistatic Vehicle Rollover Tests SAE Technical Paper 973334 1997 10.4271/973334
- Parenteau , C. and Shah , M. Driver Injuries in US Single- Event Rollovers SAE Technical Paper 2000-01-0633 2000 10.4271/2000-01-0633
- Parenteau , C. , Gopal , M. , and Viano , D. Near and Far- Side Adult Front Passenger Kinematics in a Vehicle Rollover SAE Technical Paper 2001-01-0176 2001 10.4271/2001-01-0176
- Thorbole Chandrashekhar K. , Renfroe David A. , Batzer Stephen A. , Belteran David and Herndon Grant Computational Analysis of A Near And Far side Occupant Kinematics In A Vehicle Rollover With Different Restraints Paper Number 09-0491-W, Stuttgart, 21st ESV June 15 18 2009
- Bidez Martha , Cochran John , King Dottie and Burke Donald III. Occupant Dynamic in Rollover Crashes: Influence of Roof deformation and Seat Belt Performance on Probable Spinal Column Injury Annals of Biomedical Engineering 35 2007 1973 1988
- LS-DYNA Keyword User's Manual, Version 971 2006
- Validation Report for 2003 Ford Explorer National Crash Analysis Center, GWU
- MADYMO Model's Manual, Release 7.0 2008
- MADYMO Application Manual, Release 7.0 2008
- Olivares G. Dynamic Seat Certification by Analysis: Volume I and II Hybrid II and Hybrid III FAA ATD Dynamic Evaluation Test Series for SAE ARP 5526 May 2009