This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Assessment Methodologies for Forward Looking Integrated Pedestrian Systems and Further Extension to Cyclist Safety: Experimental and Virtual Testing for Pedestrian Protection
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published January 14, 2015 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Pedestrians and cyclists are the most unprotected road users and their injury risk in case of accidents is significantly higher than for other road users. The understanding of the influence and sensitivity between important variables describing a pedestrian crash is key for the development of more efficient and reliable safety systems. This paper reflects the related work carried out within the AsPeCSS project. The results summarized out of virtual and physical tests provide valuable information for further development.
1168 virtual and 120 physical tests were carried out with adult and child pedestrian headform as well as upper and lower legform impactors representatives of 4 different vehicle front geometries in a wide range of impact speeds, angles and locations. This test matrix was based on previous work carried out within the AsPeCSS project.
The results obtained show several trends and influences of input variables (impact speed, angle, location, impactor masses, impactor type) on the particular outcomes. In general, impact speed was the most influential parameter. The increase of impact speed resulted in higher HIC, bending moment or force presumably generating a higher injury risk. The work carried out provided the results to enable further development of Injury Risk Curves regarding VRU protection for different body regions.
This work provides insight into the variation of injury criteria when also considering different speed and angles which is especially useful for the evaluation of active safety systems (e.g. AEB).
|Technical Paper||Development of Bicycle Surrogate for Bicyclist Pre-Collision System Evaluation|
|Ground Vehicle Standard||Active Safety Pedestrian Test Mannequin Recommendation|
|Technical Paper||Enhancing Traffic Safety by Active Safety Innovations|
CitationFerrer, A., de Hair, S., Zander, O., Fredriksson, R. et al., "Assessment Methodologies for Forward Looking Integrated Pedestrian Systems and Further Extension to Cyclist Safety: Experimental and Virtual Testing for Pedestrian Protection," SAE Technical Paper 2015-26-0160, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4271/2015-26-0160.
- European Commission Road Safety Vademecum: Road safety trends, statistics and challenges in the EU 2011-2012 2012
- World Health Organization Pedestrian Safety: A Road Safety Manual for Decision-Makers and Practitioners Geneva ERSO 2013
- Wisch , M. , Seiniger , P. , Pastor , C. , Edwards , M. , Visvikis , C. , Reeves , C. Scenarios and weighting factors for pre-crash assessment of integrated pedestrian safety systems Deliverable 1.1 AsPeCSS project SST.2011.RTD-1 GA No. 285106 2013
- Edwards , M. , Nathanson , A. , Wisch , M. Benefit estimate and assessment methodologies for pre-crash braking part of forward-looking integrated pedestrian safety systems Deliverable 1.3 AsPeCSS project SST.2011.RTD-1 GA No. 285106 2014
- Mottola , E. ; Rodarius , C. and Schaub , S. Pedestrian kinematics and specifications of new impact conditions for head and legform impactors Deliverable 3.1 AsPeCSS project SST.2011.RTD-1 GA No. 285106 2013
- Eggers , A. et al. D6.1 Analysis of new simulation technologies for pedestrian safety. Potential of VT to fully substitute RT for this purpose FP7-2007-SST-218688 IMVITER project 2012
- Rodarius , C. Kwakkernaat , M. and Edwards , M. Benefit estimate based on previous studies for pre-crash bicyclist systems and recommendations for necessary changes to pedestrian test and assessment protocol Deliverable 1.5 AsPeCSS project SST.2011.RTD-1 GA No. 285106 2014