This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Quantitative Effects of Vehicle Parameters on Fuel Consumption for Heavy-Duty Vehicle
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published September 29, 2015 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
The National Renewable Energy Laboratory's (NREL's) Fleet Test and Evaluations team recently conducted chassis dynamometer tests of a class 8 conventional regional delivery truck over the Heavy Heavy-Duty Diesel Truck (HHDDT), West Virginia University City (WVU City), and Composite International Truck Local and Commuter Cycle (CILCC) drive cycles. A quantitative study analyzed the impacts of various factors on fuel consumption (FC) and fuel economy (FE) by modeling and simulating the truck using NREL's Future Automotive Systems Technology Simulator (FASTSim). Factors included vehicle weight and the coefficients of rolling resistance and aerodynamic drag. Simulation results from a single parametric study revealed that FC was approximately a linear function of the weight, coefficient of aerodynamic drag, and rolling resistance over various drive cycles. The study of the impact of two technologies on FE suggested that, depending on the circumstances, it may be more cost effective to reduce one parameter (such as coefficient of aerodynamic drag) to increase fuel economy, or it may be more beneficial to reduce another (such as the coefficient of rolling resistance). It also provided a convenient way to estimate FE by interpolating within the parameter values and extrapolating outside of them. The simulation results indicated that FC could be reduced from 38.70 L/100 km, 50.72 L/100 km, and 38.42 L/100 km in the baseline truck to 26.78 L/100 km, 43.14 L/100 km and 29.84 L/100 km over the HHDDT, WVU City and CILCC drive cycles, respectively, when the U.S. Department of Energy's three targeted new technologies were applied simultaneously.
CitationWang, L., Kelly, K., Walkowicz, K., and Duran, A., "Quantitative Effects of Vehicle Parameters on Fuel Consumption for Heavy-Duty Vehicle," SAE Technical Paper 2015-01-2773, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4271/2015-01-2773.
- U.S. Energy Information Administration EIA Annual Energy Outlook 2010 with Projections to 2035 http://www.eia.gov/oiaf/aeo/pdf/0383(2010).pdf April 6 2015
- U.S. Department of Energy Research and Development Opportunities for Heavy Trucks June 2009 http://www1.eere.energy.gov/vehiclesandfuels/pdfs/truck_efficiency_paper_v2.pdf
- U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Regulations & Standards: Heavy-duty - Extending the Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Medium- and Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles http://www.epa.gov/otaq/climate/regs-heavy-duty.htm March 2015
- TA Engineering, Inc. DOE SuperTruck Program Benefits Analysis http://www.transportation.anl.gov/pdfs/TA/903.PDF March 2015
- National Renewable Energy Laboratory Future Automotive System Technology Simulator http://www.nrel.gov/transportation/fastsim.html April 6 2015
- Committee to Assess Fuel Economy Technologies for Medium-and Heavy-Duty Vehicles, National Research Council, and Transportation Research Board Technologies and Approaches to Reducing the Fuel Consumption of Medium- and Heavy-Duty Vehicles Washington, D.C. The National Academies Press 2010 https://www.nap.edu/login.php?record_id=12845&page=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nap.edu%2Fdownload.php%3Frecord_id%3D12845
- Clark , N.N. , Gautam , M. , Wayne , W.S. , Thompson , G.J. et al. California Heavy Heavy-Duty Diesel Truck Emissions Characterization for Project E-55/E-59 Phase 1.5 CRC Project E-55/59 Report August 2004 http://crcao.org/reports/recentstudies2004/E55-1.5%20FINAL%20REPORT%20Aug%2020.pdf April 6 2015
- Code of Federal Regulations Protection of the Environment, CFR Appendix I to Part 86 - Urban Driving Dynamometer Schedule Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office 2005
- Clark , N. , Tehranian , A. , Jarrett , R. , and Nine , R. Translation of Distance-Specific Emissions Rates between Different Heavy Duty Vehicle Chassis Test Schedules SAE Technical Paper 2002-01-1754 2002 10.4271/2002-01-1754
- Clark , N. , Gautam , M. , Wayne , W. , Nine , R. et al. Creation and Evaluation of a Medium Heavy-Duty Truck Test Cycle SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-3284 2003 10.4271/2003-01-3284
- Lammert , C. Twelve-Month Evaluation of UPS Hybrid Electric Delivery Vans Technical Report Golden, CO National Renewable Energy Laboratory December 2009
- U.S. Department of Energy Office Energy and Efficiency and Renewable Energy Roadmap and Technical White Papers, 21st Century Truck Partnership February 2013 http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2014/02/f8/21ctp_roadmap_white_papers_2013.pdf April 6 2015
- Landau , L.D. , and Lifshitz , E.M. Theory of Elasticity, Third Edition 7 Course of Theoretical Physics Butterworth-Heinemann Oxford, UK 1986 978-0-08-057069-3
- O'Keefe , M.P. , and Vertin , K. An Analysis of Hybrid Electric Propulsion Systems for Transit Buses Golden, CO National Renewable Energy Laboratory October 2002 http://www.nrel.gov/docx/gen/fy03/32858.pdf April 6 2015
- Wohlecker , R. , Johannaber , M. , and Espig , M. Determination of Weight Elasticity of Fuel Economy for ICE, Hybrid and Fuel Cell Vehicles SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-0343 2007 10.4271/2007-01-0343