This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Effect of Vehicle's Front End Profile on Pedestrian's Lower Extremity Injury Pattern in Real World and Verification by Large Male FE Human Model
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 14, 2015 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Logistic regression analysis for accident cases of NASS-PCDS (National Automotive Sampling System-Pedestrian Crash Data Study) clearly shows that the extent and the degree of pedestrian's lower extremity injury depend on various factors such as the impact speed, the ratio of the pedestrian height to that of the bonnet leading edge (BLE) of the striking vehicle, bumper to knee ratio, bumper lead angle, age of the pedestrian, and posture of the pedestrian at the time of impact. The pedestrian population is divided in 3 groups, equivalent to small-shorter, medium-height and large-taller pedestrian with respect to the “pedestrian to BLE height-ratio” in order to quantify the degree of influence of lower leg injuries in each group. Large adult male finite element model (95th percentile male: 190 cm and 103 kg) was developed by morphing the Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association (JAMA) 50th percentile male. Lower extremity of developed large male was fine meshed to predict the fractures accurately. A car model was systematically morphed to create different designs having various front end profile dimensions. Large male model with fine meshed lower extremity was impacted against those series of morphed vehicle models. Effect of vehicle's front end profile on lower extremity bone injuries was evaluated by accident analysis of PCDS data and their trends are verified by FE simulation of large male HBM. The results from accident analysis had good correlation with those obtained from FE simulations.
CitationPal, C., Okabe, T., Vimalathithan, K., Manoharan, J. et al., "Effect of Vehicle's Front End Profile on Pedestrian's Lower Extremity Injury Pattern in Real World and Verification by Large Male FE Human Model," SAE Technical Paper 2015-01-1467, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4271/2015-01-1467.
- National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Traffic Safety Facts 2012, http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/ 812016.pdf.
- Mizuno, Y., “Summary of IHRA Pedestrian Safety WG Activities”, ESV 19, No. 138, 2005.
- Costin, D., Shin. Jaeho, Ivarsson. Johan, Crandall Jeff R. et al., “A study of the pedestrian impact kinematics using finite element dummy models: the corridors and dimensional analysis scaling of upper-body trajectories”, International Journal of Crashworthiness Volume 13, Issue 5, 2008
- Shinichi., Takayama, Yamamoto., Yoshihiro, Ejima., Susumu, Ono, Koshiro et al., “The Clarification of Individual Injury Mechanism Difference in Pedestrian FE Model Utilizing Cadaver Scaling and Posturing Techniques”, ESV22, No.11-0414, 2011.
- Binkley. Teresa L., Specker. Bonny L., and Wittig. Timothy A., “Centile Curves for Bone Densitometry Measurements in Healthy Males and Females Ages 5-22Yr”, Journal of Clinical Densitometry, vol. 5, no. 4, 343-353, Winter 2002.
- Wetzsteon. Rachel J., Zemel. Babette S., Shults. Justine, Howard Krista M. et al., “Mechanical Loads and Cortical Bone Geometry in Healthy Children and Young Adults”, National Institute of Health, 2011 May 1; 48(5): 1103-1108.
- Han Y., Yang J., Mizuno K., Matsui Y., “Effects of vehicle impact velocity, vehicle front-end shapes on pedestrian injury risk”, Traffic Injury Prevention, 2012.Sept. 13(5), page 507-18.
- Watanabe R., Katsuhara, T., Miyazaki, H., Kitagawa, Y et al., “Research of the relationship of pedestrian injury to collision speed, car-type, impact location and pedestrian sizes using human FE model (THUMS Version 4)”, Stapp Car Crash Journal, 2012 Oct.; 56.
- Kawabe, Y., Asai, T., Murakami, D., Pal, C. et al., “Different Factors Influencing Post-crash Pedestrian Kinematics,” SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars - Mech. Syst. 5(1):214-230, 2012, doi:10.4271/2012-01-0271.
- Pal, C., Okabe, T., Muthukumar, M., Satheesh, N., “Human FE Model to Estimate Head Contact Time for Pedestrian Protection Requirements”, ESV 2013, Paper No. 13-0376.
- Pal, C., Okabe, T., Vimalathithan, K., Manoharan, J. et al., “Estimation of Pelvis Injuries and Head Impact Time using Different Pedestrian Human FE Models,” SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-0522, 2014, doi:10.4271/2014-01-0522.
- Kendall, R., Meissner, M., and Crandall, J., “The Causes of Head Injury in Vehicle-Pedestrian Impacts: Comparing the Relative Danger of Vehicle and Road Surface,” SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-0462, 2006, doi:10.4271/2006-01-0462.
- Transportation Data Center Data Set Codebook for NASS-PCDS 1994-1998, Version 03-Mar-2001.
- Euro-NCAP, http://www.euroncap.com/files/Euro-NCAP-Pedestrian-Protocol-v7.1.1---0-c573c763-8670-44fb-86ae-c43f19641b2f.pdf.
- People Size, version 2008, http://www.openerg.com/psz/anthropometry_data.html.