This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Installed Positions of Child Restraint Systems in Vehicle Second Rows
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 14, 2015 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
This study documented the position and orientation of child restraint systems (CRS) installed in the second rows of vehicles, creating a database of 486 installations. Thirty-one different CRS were evaluated, selected to provide a range of manufacturers, sizes, types, and weight limits. Eleven CRS were rear-facing only, fourteen were convertibles, five were combination restraints, and one was a booster. Ten top-selling vehicles were selected to provide a range of manufacturers and body styles: four sedans, four SUVS, one minivan, and one wagon.
CRS were marked with three reference points on each moving component. The contours and landmarks of each CRS were first measured in the laboratory. Vehicle interior contours, belt anchors, and LATCH anchors were measured using a similar process. Then each CRS was installed in a vehicle using LATCH according to manufacturers' directions, and the reference points of each CRS component were measured to document the installed orientation. Seven CRS were installed in all vehicles, while the remaining twenty-four CRS were divided into three groups, each tested in three or four vehicles.
The geometric data for each vehicle and CRS were imported into Hypermesh software for processing. The measured coordinates of the CRS reference points were used to orient the CRS geometry appropriately in each vehicle. Results include differences in installed orientation and lateral position across vehicles, CRS, and seating positions. The distance and angle from the lower anchor (LA) to the LATCH belt contact point on the CRS belt path are also reported. Specific examples of CRS/vehicle incompatibility are included.
|Technical Paper||Potential improvements to the Canadian Child Restraint Regulations|
|Technical Paper||A New Method to Assess the Summer Suitability of Car Seats|
|Technical Paper||Evolution of Airbag Components and Materials|
CitationKlinich, K., Boyle, K., Malik, L., Manary, M. et al., "Installed Positions of Child Restraint Systems in Vehicle Second Rows," SAE Technical Paper 2015-01-1452, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4271/2015-01-1452.
- American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Injury, Violence, and Poison Prevention 2011 Policy Statement: Child passenger safety Pediatrics 127 788 793
- Bunkley N. January 6 2014 13 Sales Story: Ford Scored Big Automotive News 1 Decina LE , Lococo KH 2005 Child restraint system use and misuse in six states Accident Analysis and Prevention 37 583 590
- Decina LE , Lococo KH 2007 Observed LATCH use and misuse characteristics of child restraint systems in seven states Journal of Safety Research 38 271 281
- Dukehart JG , Walker L , Lococo K , Decina LE , Staplin L 2007 Safe Kids Checkup Events: A National Study SafeKids Worldwide Washington DC
- Eby DW , Kostyniuk LP 1999 A statewide analysis of child safety seat use and misuse in Michigan Accident Analysis and Prevention 31 555 566
- International Standards Organization 1999a Road vehicles - Anchorages in vehicles and attachments to anchorages for child restraint systems - Part 1: Seat bight anchorages and attachments ISO/IS 13216-1 ISO Geneva December 1999
- International Standards Organization 1999b Road vehicles - Child restraint systems - Reduction of misuse risk - Part 2: Requirements and testing procedure for correct installation (panel method) ISO/IS 13215-2 ISO Geneva November 1999
- International Standards Organization 1999c Road vehicles - Child restraint systems - Reduction of misuse risk - Part 3: Prediction and assessment of misuse by Misuse Mode and Effect Analysis (MMEA) ISO/IS 13215- 3 ISO Geneva April 1999
- International Standards Organization 2010 Road Vehicles - Methods and Criteria for Usability Evaluation of Child Restraint Systems and Their Interface With Vehicle Anchorage Systems - Part 1 Vehicles and Child Restraints Equipped with ISOFIX Anchorages and Attachments CD 29061-1 Geneva, Switzerland
- Lesire P , Cuny S , Alonso F , Tejera G , Cataldi M 2007 Misuse of child restraint systems in crash situations - danger and possible consequences AAAM 51 207 222
- National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 2006 Consumer Information Rating Program for Child Restraints Docket NHTSA-2006-25344 US Department of Transportation Washington DC
- National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 2014 National Child Passenger Safety Certification Training Program Cpsboard.org
- Pedder J and Hillebrandt D 2007 The development and application of a child restraint usability rating system ESV Paper Number 07-0509
- Reed MP , Ebert-Hamilton SM , and Klinich KD 2014 Characterizing Vehicle Rear Compartment Geometry for Child Restraint Applications DOT HS 811 057
- SAE International Surface Vehicle Recommended Practice Guidelines for Implementation of the Child Restraint Anchorage System or LATCH System in Motor Vehicles and Child Restraint Systems SAE Standard J2893 2015
- SAE International Surface vehicle Recommended Practice Securing Child Restraint Systems in Motor Vehicles SAE Standard J1819 July 1999
- Tai A , Bilston LE , Brown J 2011 The cumulative effect of multiple forms of minor incorrect use in forward facing child restraints on head injury risk Paper Number 11-0118 Proceedings of the 2011 ESV Conference
- Weber , K. and Melvin , J. Injury Potential with Misused Child Restraining Systems SAE Technical Paper 831604 1983 10.4271/831604