This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Piston Design Impact on the Scavenging and Combustion in an Opposed-Piston, Opposed-Cylinder (OPOC) Two-Stroke Engine
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 14, 2015 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
A comprehensive investigation on the impact of piston design on scavenging and combustion in an opposed- piston, opposed-cylinder (OPOC) two-stroke engine is carried out and presented in this paper. Two-stroke engines, in general, have superior power densities and brake thermal efficiencies. Compared with opposed-piston (OP) engines, the OPOC architecture comprises only one crankshaft instead of two, and all the forces generated on the piston go to this one crankshaft via a common bearing, thus making the engine structure inherently simple, lightweight, compact and efficient. Due to the piston motion of the OPOC engine, two opposing injectors were mounted at the center of the cylinder wall for each cylinder. This unique feature posed challenges on air entrainment for air/fuel mixing because of the inherent limited space for injection spreading angle near top-dead-center (TDC). Motivated in this regard, a novel torus chamber design (a combination of both pistons which form a ring-shaped combustion chamber at TDC) was adopted, and has been proved to be more efficient in air utilization for combustion. In the design process of the piston for the OPOC engine, other factors such as gas scavenging, piston thermal management, which are critical to engine performance and durability, are also taken into account.
In this work, simulation was performed using three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics with state-of-the-art spray, turbulence and combustion models. The simulation was first validated against test data and then used for piston design optimization. The results show how the optimized torus combustion chamber design improves combustion and achieves balance between scavenging and combustion as well as piston thermal management.
CitationHuo, M., Huang, Y., and Hofbauer, P., "Piston Design Impact on the Scavenging and Combustion in an Opposed-Piston, Opposed-Cylinder (OPOC) Two-Stroke Engine," SAE Technical Paper 2015-01-1269, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4271/2015-01-1269.
- Hofbauer , P. Opposed Piston Opposed Cylinder (opoc) Engine for Military Ground Vehicles SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-1548 2005 10.4271/2005-01-1548
- Franke , M. , Huang , H. , Liu , J. , Geistert , A. et al. Franke , M. , Huang , H. , Liu , J. , Geistert , A. et al. Opposed Piston Opposed Cylinder (opoc™) 450 hp Engine: Performance Development by CAE Simulations and Testing SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-0277 2006 10.4271/2006-01-0277
- Kalkstein , J. , Röver , W. , Campbell , B. , Zhong , L. et al. Opposed Piston Opposed Cylinder (opoc™) 5/10 kW Heavy Fuel Engine for UAVs and APUs SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-0278 2006 10.4271/2006-01-0278
- Pirault J.P , Flint M. Opposed Piston Engines: Evolution, Use, and Future Applications, SAE International Warrendale, PA 978-0-7680-1800-4 2009 10.4271/R-378
- Herold , R. , Wahl , M. , Regner , G. , Lemke , J. et al. Thermodynamic Benefits of Opposed-Piston Two-Stroke Engines SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-2216 2011 10.4271/2011-01-2216
- Zhao , Z. , Wu , D. , Zhang , F. , and Zhang , Z. Design and Performance Simulation of Opposed-Piston Folded-Cranktrain Engines SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-1638 2014 10.4271/2014-01-1638
- Zhang , Z. , Zhao , C. , Wu , D. , Zhang , F. et al. Effect of Piston Dynamic on the Working Processes of an Opposed-Piston Two-Stroke Folded-Cranktrain Engine SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-1628 2014 10.4271/2014-01-1628
- Venugopal , R. , Abani , N. , and MacKenzie , R. Effects of Injection Pattern Design on Piston Thermal Management in an Opposed-Piston Two-Stroke Engine SAE Technical Paper 2013-01-2423 2013 10.4271/2013-01-2423
- Hofbauer , P Stroke of Genius OPOC Takes Two Engine Technology International June 1999
- Hofbauer , Peter Internal Combustion Engine with A Single Crankshaft And Having Opposed Cylinders with Opposed Pistons U.S patent no. US 6,170,443, B1
- Louvigny Y. , Duysinx P. Advanced Engine Dynamics Using MBS: Application to Twin-Cylinder Boxer Engines 1 st Joint International Conference on Multibody System Dyanmics Lappeenranta 2010
- Richards K.J. , Senecal P.K. , Pomraning E. CONVERGE Theory Manual (Version 2.2) Convergent Science Inc Middleton, WI 2014