This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Optimization of Heat Release Shape and the Connecting Rod Crank Radius Ratio for Low Engine Noise and High Thermal Efficiency of Premixed Diesel Engine Combustion
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 14, 2015 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Premixed diesel combustion offers the potential of high thermal efficiency and low emissions, however, because the rapid rate of pressure rise and short combustion durations are often associated with low temperature combustion processes, noise is also an issue. The reduction of combustion noise is a technical matter that needs separate attention. Engine noise research has been conducted experimentally with a premixed diesel engine and techniques for engine noise simulation have been developed. The engine employed in the research here is a supercharged, single cylinder DI diesel research engine with a high pressure common rail fuel injection system. In the experiments, the engine was operated at 1600 rpm and 2000 rpm, the engine noise was sampled by two microphones, and the sampled engine noise was averaged and analyzed by an FFT sound analyzer. The structural attenuation of the test engine was calculated from the power spectrum of the FFT analysis of the in-cylinder pressure wave data and the cross power spectrum of the sound pressure of the engine noise by the coherence method. With the heat release history approximated by the Wiebe function, the pressure history could be calculated from the fitted curves of the heat release, and the simulated combustion noise was calculated from the pressure history and structural attenuation.
Two simulations were conducted for this paper. Since combustion noise arises in a trade-off relation with thermal efficiency in general, the best heat release shape for low engine noise and high thermal efficiency was first investigated. The simulation parameters of the heat release shape are the crank angle at 50% burn (CA50), the maximum rate of heat release, the combustion duration, and the initial rise in the high temperature heat release. Based on the heat release data of the engine tests, initial conditions were set and the simulation was conducted with these initial conditions. The simulation results show that the CA50 and degree of constant volume are related to the thermal efficiency and the initial rise in the high temperature heat release is related to the engine noise. For the conditions studied in this research, the thermal efficiency is maximum when the CA50 of the heat release occurs at 4.0 °CA ATDC, and the optimum engine operation for lower engine noise with higher thermal efficiency can be achieved by a mild initial rise in the high temperature heat release (the parameter-M=2.0 in the Wiebe function) and a high degree of constant volume combustion.
The effects of the connecting rod/crank radius ratio (L/R ratio, Figure 10) on combustion noise and thermal efficiency were also investigated. The L/R ratio was changed from 2.5 to 8 in 0.5 steps, and the heat balance and combustion noise were calculated. The simulation results show that improvements in the thermal efficiency can be achieved with decreases in the L/R ratio, caused by the cooling loss reduction, but that L/R ratio changes do not result in a reduction in combustion noise. Further, the heat release shape for the optimum thermal efficiency and combustion noise was calculated from the points of the L/R ratio, maximum rate of heat release, and combustion duration.
The results of the pre-mixed diesel engine operation and the engine test data were compared with the simulation data. The parameters for this comparison were the intake oxygen content and the fuel injection timing. The engine test data shows that the parameter-M in the Wiebe function increases with delays in the CA50 position, and that there is a strong linear relation between the CA50 and the Wiebe parameter-M.
CitationShibata, G., Ishi, K., Ushijima, H., Shibaike, Y. et al., "Optimization of Heat Release Shape and the Connecting Rod Crank Radius Ratio for Low Engine Noise and High Thermal Efficiency of Premixed Diesel Engine Combustion," SAE Technical Paper 2015-01-0825, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4271/2015-01-0825.
- Murayama, T., Kojima, N., and Satomi, Y., “A Simulation of Diesel Engine Combustion Noise,” SAE Technical Paper 760552, 1976, doi:10.4271/760552.
- Kojima, N., “An Evaluation of Combustion Noise Generation in Diesel Engine Structure,” SAE Technical Paper 890126, 1989, doi:10.4271/890126.
- Komori, M., Miura, Y., Mikami, M., and Kojima, N., “19 Separation of Combustion Noise using Transient Noise Generation Model”, 2002-32-1788.
- Sjöberg, M. and Dec, J., “Effects of Engine Speed, Fueling Rate, and Combustion Phasing on the Thermal Stratification Required to Limit HCCI Knocking Intensity,” SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-2125, 2005, doi:10.4271/2005-01-2125.
- Johansson, T., Johansson, B., Tunestål, P., and Aulin, H., “HCCI Operating Range in a Turbo-charged Multi Cylinder Engine with VVT and Spray-Guided DI,” SAE Technical Paper 2009-01-0494, 2009, doi:10.4271/2009-01-0494.
- Scarpati, J., Wikström, A., Jönsson, O., Glav, R. et al., “Prediction of Engine Noise using Parameterized Combustion Pressure Curves,” SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-2373, 2007, doi:10.4271/2007-01-2373.
- Shahlari, A., Hocking, C., Kurtz, E., and Ghandhi, J., “Comparison of Compression Ignition Engine Noise Metrics in Low-Temperature Combustion Regimes,” SAE Int. J. Engines 6(1):541-552, 2013, doi:10.4271/2013-01-1659.
- Torii, K., “Method Using Multiple Regression Analysis to Separate Engine Radiation Noise into the Contributions of Combustion Noise and Mechanical Noise in the Time Domain,” SAE Int. J. Engines 7(3):1502-1513, 2014, doi:10.4271/2014-01-1678.
- Badami, M., Mallamo, F., Millo, F., and Rossi, E., “Influence of Multiple Injection Strategies on Emissions, Combustion Noise and BSFC of a DI Common Rail Diesel Engine,” SAE Technical Paper 2002-01-0503, 2002, doi:10.4271/2002-01-0503.
- Fuyuto, T., Taki, M., Ueda, R., Hattori, Y. et al., “Noise and Emissions Reduction by Second Injection in Diesel PCCI Combustion with Split Injection,” SAE Int. J. Engines 7(4):1900-1910, 2014, doi:10.4271/2014-01-2676.
- Shibata, G., Shibaike, Y., Ushijima, H., and Ogawa, H., “Identification of Factors Influencing Premixed Diesel Engine Noise and Mechanism of Noise Reduction by EGR and Supercharging,” SAE Technical Paper 2013-01-0313, 2013, doi:10.4271/2013-01-0313.
- Shibata, G., Ushijima, H., Ogawa, H., and Shibaike, Y., “Combustion Noise Analysis of Premixed Diesel Engine by Engine Tests and Simulations,” SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-1293, 2014, doi:10.4271/2014-01-1293.
- Okubo, M., and Yonezawa, T., “Study of Method of Separate Engine Noise Sources Using Coherence Analysis”, JSAE Technical Paper 896021, vol. 40, pp152-158, 1989.
- Shibata, G., Oyama, K., Urushihara, T., and Nakano, T., “Correlation of Low Temperature Heat Release With Fuel Composition and HCCI Engine Combustion,” SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-0138, 2005, doi:10.4271/2005-01-0138.
- Shibata, G. and Urushihara, T., “The Interaction Between Fuel Chemicals and HCCI Combustion Characteristics Under Heated Intake Air Conditions,” SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-0207, 2006, doi:10.4271/2006-01-0207.
- Shibata, G. and Urushihara, T., “Auto-Ignition Characteristics of Hydrocarbons and Development of HCCI Fuel Index,” SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-0220, 2007, doi:10.4271/2007-01-0220.