This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Comparison of In-Cylinder Pressure Measurement Methods in a Small Spark Ignition Engine
Technical Paper
2014-32-0007
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
In this work, in-cylinder pressure was measured in a 55 cc single cylinder, 4.4 kW, two stroke, spark ignition engine. In cylinder pressure measurements were taken using two different pressure transducers to determine if the performance differences between the two transducers are discernible in a small, spark ignition engine. A Kistler brand measuring spark plug was compared to a Kistler brand flush mount high temperature pressure sensor. Both sensors employ piezo-electric pressure sensing elements and were designed to measure indicated mean effective pressure as well as to detect knock at high temperature engine conditions. The pressure sensors were installed and adjusted to ensure cylinder volume after sensor installation matched the engine's original configuration within reasonable manufacturing tolerances.
A series of tests at four throttle settings ensued to determine if either device altered the combustion volume or the engine's performance. Performance measurements were obtained over a range of engine speeds from 4000 rpm to 6000 rpm. Run to run variation from randomness in the control variables results in a 2% to 5% variation in indicated mean effective pressure. The performance difference between the two spark plugs is less than that variation. Thus, the results indicate that, as a spark plug, the Kistler measuring spark plug is not statistically different from the stock spark plug at the 95% confidence level. The results do indicate a statistically significant difference at the 95% confidence level between the pressure transducer in the measuring spark plug and the flush mount transducer. This difference, which amounts to 4% of indicated mean effective pressure, is the result of differences in the sensor linearity, likely arising from the factory calibrations. Finally, the results reveal a statistically significant difference in performance between the modified and unmodified engine heads above 6000 rpm at the 95% confidence level. This verifies the suppositions of other researchers who note that even a small modification to the combustion chamber of an engine this size could significantly impact the performance, measured in this instance as IMEP.
Recommended Content
Authors
Citation
Ausserer, J., Rowton, A., Grinstead, K., Litke, P. et al., "Comparison of In-Cylinder Pressure Measurement Methods in a Small Spark Ignition Engine," SAE Technical Paper 2014-32-0007, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4271/2014-32-0007.Also In
References
- Bueno A. V. , Velasquez J. A. , and Milanez L. F. Internal Combustion Engine Indicating Measurements Applied Measurement Systems InTech 2012
- Taylor C. F. The Internal Combustion Engine in Theory and Practice: Volume 1: Thermodynamics, Fluid Flow, Performance 2nd 1 First MIT Press 1985
- Ferguson C. R. and Kirkpatrick A. T. Internal Combustion Engines: Applied Thermosciences New York John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2000
- Heywood J. B. Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals McGraw Hill 1988
- Brown , W. Methods for Evaluating Requirements and Errors in Cylinder Pressure Measurement SAE Technical Paper 670008 1967 10.4271/670008
- Foster , D. An Overview of Zero-Dimensional Thermodynamic Models for IC Engine Data Analysis SAE Technical Paper 852070 1985 10.4271/852070
- Lancaster , D. , Krieger , R. , and Lienesch , J. Measurement and Analysis of Engine Pressure Data SAE Technical Paper 750026 1975 10.4271/750026
- Pischinger R. and Krabnig G. Problems of Pressure Indication in Internal Combustion Engines COMODIA Tokyo, Japan 1985
- Rogers , D.R. Engine Combustion: Pressure Measurement and Analysis Warrendale SAE International 2010 10.4271/R-388
- Ausserer , J. , Litke , P. , Groenewegen , J. , Rowton , A. et al. Development of Test Bench and Characterization of Performance in Small Internal Combustion Engines 2013
- Wiegand , A. , Miers , S. , Blough , J. , Kowalski , D. et al. Development of a Micro-Engine Testing System SAE Technical Paper 2012-32-0105 2012 10.4271/2012-32-0105
- Wiegand A. Conversion of a Micro, Glow-Ignition, Two-Stroke Engine from Nitromethane-Methanol Blend Fuel to Military Jet Propellant (JP-8) M.S. in Mechanical Engineering Michigan Technological University 2012
- Menon S. , Cadou C. , and Moulton N. Development of a Dynamometer for Measuring Small Internal-Combustion Engine Performance Journal of Propulsion and Power 23 194 202 2007 10.2514/1.19825
- Menon S. and Cadou C. Scaling of Miniature Piston Engine Performance Part 2: Energy Losses Journal of Propulsion and Power 29 788 799 July August 2013 10.2514/1.B34639
- Menon S. and Cadou C. Scaling of Miniature Piston-Engine Performane Part 1: Overall Engine Performance Journal of Propulsion and Power 29 774 787 July August 2013 10.2514/1.B34638
- Menon S. The Scaling of Performance and Losses in Miniature Internal Combustion Engines Ph.D. Aeronautical Engineering Department of Aeronautical Engineering, University of Maryland 2010
- Menon S. and Cadou C. Investigation of Combustion Processes in Miniature Internal Combustion Engines Combustion Science and Technology 185 1667 1695 2013 10.1080/00102202.2013.829720
- Papac J. and Dunn-Rankin D. In Cylinder Pressure and Combustion Measurements in a Minature Reciprocating Engine 4th Joint Meeting of the U.S. Section of the Combustion Institute Philadelphia, PA 2005
- Raine R. R. , Moyle K. , Otte G. , and Robertson J. A Cost-Effective Teaching and Research Dynamometer for Small Engines International Journal of Engineering Education 18 50 57 2002 0949-149X/91
- Taylor C. F. The Internal Combustion Engine in Theory and Practice: Volume 2: Combustion, Fuels, Materials, Design 2 MIT First Press 1985
- Kline S. J. and McClintock F. A. Describing Uncertainties in Single Sample Experiments Mechnical Engineering January 1953
- Moffat R. J. Describing the Uncertainties in Experimental Results Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 3 17 1988