This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Structural Design Strategies for Improved Small Overlap Crashworthiness Performance
Published November 10, 2014 by The Stapp Association in United States
Annotation ability available
In 2012, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) began a 64 km/h small overlap frontal crash test consumer information test program. Thirteen automakers already have redesigned models to improve test performance. One or more distinct strategies are evident in these redesigns: reinforcement of the occupant compartment, use of energy-absorbing fender structures, and the addition of engagement structures to induce vehicle lateral translation. Each strategy influences vehicle kinematics, posing additional challenges for the restraint systems. The objective of this two-part study was to examine how vehicles were modified to improve small overlap test performance and then to examine how these modifications affect dummy response and restraint system performance. Among eight models tested before and after design changes, occupant compartment intrusion reductions ranged from 6 cm to 45 cm, with the highest reductions observed in models with the largest number of modifications. All redesigns included additional occupant compartment reinforcement, one-third added structures to engage the barrier, and two modified a shotgun load path. Designs with engagement structures produced greater glance-off from the barrier and exhibited lower delta Vs but experienced more lateral outboard motion of the dummy. Designs with heavy reinforcement of the occupant compartment had higher vehicle accelerations and delta V. In three cases, these apparent trade-offs were not well addressed by concurrent changes in restraint systems and resulted in increased injury risk compared with the original tests. Among the 36 models tested after design changes, the extent of design changes correlated to structural performance. Half of the vehicles with the lowest intrusion levels incorporated aspects of all three design strategies. Vehicle kinematics and dummy and restraint system characteristics were similar to those observed in the before/after pairs. Different combinations of structural improvement strategies for improving small overlap test performance were found to be effective in reducing occupant compartment intrusion and improving dummy kinematics in the IIHS small overlap test with modest weight increase.
CitationMueller, B., Brethwaite, A., Zuby, D., and Nolan, J., "Structural Design Strategies for Improved Small Overlap Crashworthiness Performance," SAE Technical Paper 2014-22-0006, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4271/2014-22-0006.
- Brumbelow, M., and Zuby, D. (2009) Impact and injury patterns in frontal crashes of vehicles with good ratings for frontal crash protection. Proc. 21st International ESV Technical Conference [book on CD-ROM]. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC.
- Fuji Heavy Industries. (2014) Subaru 14MY Forester: Concept of Small Overlap Collision. May, 2014. Tokyo, Japan.
- Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. (2004) Guidelines for using the UMTRI ATD positioning procedure for ATD and seat positioning (ver. V). Arlington, VA.
- Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. (2012a) Small overlap frontal crashworthiness evaluation crash test protocol (ver. II). Arlington, VA.
- Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. (2012b) Small overlap frontal crashworthiness evaluation rating protocol (ver. II). Arlington, VA.
- Jakobsson, L., McInally, G., Axelson, A., Lindman, M., Kling, A., Broberg, T., Fermér, M., and Wågström, L. (2013) Severe frontal collisions with partial overlap: two decades of car safety development. SAE Technical Paper 2013-01-0759. SAE International, Warrendale, PA.
- Kuehn, M., Hummel, T., and Bende, J. (2013) Small Overlap Frontal Impacts Involving Passenger Cars in Germany. Proc. 23rd International ESV Technical Conference [book on CD-ROM]. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC.
- Lindquist, M., Hall, A., and Björnstig, U. (2004) Car structural characteristics of fatal frontal crashes in Sweden. International Journal of Crashworthiness. 9:587-597.
- Mueller, B., Sherwood, C., Nolan, J., and Zuby, D. (2013) Repeatability of the IIHS small overlap frontal crash test. Proc. 23rd International ESV Technical Conference [book on CD-ROM]. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC.
- Ohnaka, R. (2013) 2013 Honda Accord: NVH collision safety. Proc. International Automotive Body Congress 2012, pp. 136-151. Curran Associates Inc., Red Hood, NY.
- Planath, I., Norin, H., and Nilsson, S. (1993) Severe frontal collisions with partial overlap: significance, test methods, and car design. SAE Technical Paper 930636. SAE International, Warrendale, PA.
- Prasad, P., Dalmotas, D., and German, A. (2014) An examination of crash, and NASS data to evaluate the field relevance of IIHS small overlap tests. SAE Government Industry Meeting (oral presentation only) January 23. Washington, DC.
- Rudd, R., Bean, J., Cuentas, C., Kahane, C., Mynatt, M., and Wiacek, C. (2009) A study of the factors affecting fatalities of air bag and belt-restrained occupants in frontal crashes. Proc. 21st International ESV Technical Conference [book on CD-ROM]. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC.
- Samaha, R., Prasad, P., and Nix, L. (2013) Opportunities for injury reduction in US frontal crashes: an overview by structural engagement, vehicle class, and occupant age. Stapp Car Crash Journal 57:441-467.
- Scullion, P., Morgan, R., Mohan, P., Kan, C., Shanks, K., Jin, W., and Tangirala, R. (2010). A reexamination of the small overlap frontal crash. Proc. 54th Annual AAAM Conference, pp.137-148. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine, Des Plaines, IL.
- Sherwood, C., Nolan, J., and Zuby, D. (2009) Characteristics of small overlap crashes. Proc. 21st International ESV Technical Conference [book on CD-ROM]. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC.
- Thomas, C. 2012. The role of the vehicle structure in reducing injuries in small overlap crashes. Proc. International Automotive Body Congress 2011, pp. 62-70. Curran Associates Inc., Red Hood, NY
- Weissler, P. (2013) 2014 MDX re-engineered to pass IIHS test, reduce NVH. Automotive Engineering Magazine, June 07. http://articles.sae.org/12225/. SAE International, Warrendale, PA.