This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Comparison of Fuel Efficiency and Traction Performances of 6 × 4 and 6 × 2 Class 8 Tractors
Journal Article
2014-01-2358
ISSN: 1946-391X, e-ISSN: 1946-3928
Sector:
Topic:
Citation:
Surcel, M. and Provencher, Y., "Comparison of Fuel Efficiency and Traction Performances of 6 × 4 and 6 × 2 Class 8 Tractors," SAE Int. J. Commer. Veh. 7(2):478-486, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4271/2014-01-2358.
Language:
English
References
- SAE International Surface Vehicle Recommended Practice Towability Design Criteria and Equipment Use- Passenger Cars, Vans, and Light-Duty Trucks SAE Standard J1142 Feb. 1994
- North American Council for Freight Efficiency (NACFE) Confidence Findings on the Potential of 6 × 2 Axles 2013
- Berg , T. Rise of the 6×2 TruckingInfo.com May 2013
- North American Council for Freight Efficiency (NACFE) Executive Report - 6×2 (Dead Axle) Tractors 2010
- Technology and Maintenance Council Relationships Between Truck Components and Fuel Economy RP 1111A March 2009
- SAE International Surface Vehicle Recommended Practice Fuel Consumption Test Procedure - Type II SAE Standard J1321 Feb. 2012
- SAE International Surface Vehicle Recommended Practice Joint TMC/SAE Fuel Consumption In-Survice Test Procedure Type III SAE Standard J1526 June 1987
- Environment Canada National inventory report, 1990-2010: Greenhouse gas sources and sinks in Canada Part 2, Annex 8, Table A8-11 Emission factors for energy mobile combustion sources 199 1910-7064 Ottawa, ON 2012
- IPCC Climate change 2007 synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Core Writing Team , Pachauri , R.K. and Reisinger , A. IPCC Geneva, Switzerland 2007
- North American Council for Freight Efficiency (NACFE) 2013 Fleet Fuel Efficiency Benchmark
- Charts Y US Retail Diesel Price http://ycharts.com/indicators/us_diesel_price April 14 2014