This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
The Potential of Lightweight Materials and Advanced Combustion Engines to Reduce Life Cycle Energy and Greenhouse Gas Emissions
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 01, 2014 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
As lightweight materials and advanced combustion engines are being used in both conventional and electrified vehicles with diverse fuels, it is necessary to evaluate the individual and combined impact of these technologies to reduce energy and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This work uses life cycle assessment (LCA) to evaluate the total energy and GHG emissions for baseline and lightweight internal combustion vehicles (ICVs), hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) when they are operated with baseline and advanced gasoline and ethanol engines. Lightweight vehicle models are evaluated with primary body-in-white (BIW) mass reductions using aluminum and advanced/high strength steel (A/HSS) and secondary mass reductions that include powertrain re-sizing. Advanced engine/fuel strategies are included in the vehicle models with fuel economy maps developed from single cylinder engine models. Results show that while the ethanol engine has the highest efficiency and therefore, highest MPGe, the increased energy required to produce ethanol outweighs this benefit. The most life cycle energy and GHG reductions occur with aluminum, but the energy and GHG reduction per unit mass removed is greater for A/HSS. For the scenarios considered in this work, the least life cycle energy and GHGs are obtained with a lightweight PHEV with an aluminum BIW and advanced gasoline engine. Overall, results show that advanced gasoline and ethanol engines and lightweight materials provide complimentary benefits for conventional and electrified vehicles and will reduce life cycle energy and GHG emissions while playing a key role in meeting future CAFE standards.
CitationLewis, A., Keoleian, G., and Kelly, J., "The Potential of Lightweight Materials and Advanced Combustion Engines to Reduce Life Cycle Energy and Greenhouse Gas Emissions," SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-1963, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4271/2014-01-1963.
- www.A2Mac1.com, “Automotive Benchmarking,” Yipsilanti, MI, 2013.
- European Aluminum Association, “The aluminum automotive manual,” 2011.
- Ford, “2013 Ford Fusion Technical Specifications,” 2013.
- Birch S., “Federal-Mogul's new 2D testing process helps diesel pistons stand the pressure,” SAE Automotive Engineering International, 2012.
- Huw E., “Ford Focus EcoBoost 1.0L Review,” AutoGuide.com, 2012.
- Roy I. Weston F., “Life cycle inventory report for the North American aluminum industry,” 1998.
- Geyer R., “Life Cycle Energy and Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Assessments of Automotive Material Substitution: WorldAutoSteel Energy and GHG Model,” 2012.
- Argonne National Laboratory, “GREET 2 rev1.” UChicago Argonne, LLC, 2012.
- Federal-Mogul, “Federal-Mogul: The Heart of Powertrains,” Powertrain overview brochure, 2013.
- Birch S., “Ford 's new 1.0-L EcoBoost I3 is big on low-friction technology,” SAE Automotive Engineering International, 2012.
- US Environmental Protection Agency, “eGRID2012 year 2009 Summary Tables,” 2012.
- Argonne National Laboratory, “GREET 1 rev2.” UChicago Argonne, LLC, 2012.
- U.S. Energy Information Administration, “Short-Term Energy Outlook June 2013,” no. June 2013, 2014.
- U.S. Energy Information Administration, “Glossary,” 2004.
- Brandt A. R., “Converting Oil Shale to Liquid Fuels with the Alberta Taciuk Processor: Energy Inputs and Greenhouse Gas Emissions,” Energy & Fuels, vol. 23, pp. 6253-6258, Dec. 2009.
- Jordaan S. M., Keith D. W., and Stelfox B., “Quantifying land use of oil sands production: a life cycle perspective,” Environmental Research Letters, vol. 4, Apr. 2009.
- U.S. Energy Information Administration, “U.S. Net Imports by Country,” 2013. [Online]. Available: http://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/pet_move_neti_a_ep00_imn_mbblpd_m.htm. [Accessed: 16-Jul-2013].
- Maugeri L., “Oil: The Next Revolution,” The Geopolitics of Energy Project, vol. Harvard Ke, no. June, 2012.
- Bergerson J. A., Kofoworola O., Charpentier A. D., Sleep S., and Maclean H. L., “Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of current oil sands technologies: surface mining and in situ applications,” Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 46, no. 14, pp. 7865-74, Jul. 2012.
- Burnham A., Han J., Clark C. E., Wang M., Dunn J. B., and Palou-Rivera I., “Life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of shale gas, natural gas, coal, and petroleum,” Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 46, pp. 619-27, Jan. 2011.
- Mui S., Tonachel L., Mcenaney B., and Shope E., “GHG Emission Factors for High Carbon Intensity Crude Oils,” Natural Resources Defense Council, no. June, 2010.
- Gerdes K. J. and Skone T. J., “An Evaluation of the Extraction, Transport and Refining of Imported Crude Oils and the Impact on Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions,” National Energy Technology Laboratory, vol. DOE/NETL-2, 2009.
- U.S. Energy Information Administration, “Biofuels Issues and Trends,” no. October, 2012.
- U.S. Energy Information Administration, “Cellulosic biofuels begin to flow but in lower volumes than foreseen by statutory targets,” Today in energy. [Online]. Available: http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=10131. [Accessed: 17-Jul-2013].
- Luo L., Voet E., Huppes G., and Udo de Haes H. A., “Allocation issues in LCA methodology: a case study of corn stover-based fuel ethanol,” The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, vol. 14, pp. 529-539, Jun. 2009.
- Wang M., Han J., Dunn J. B., Cai H., and Elgowainy A., “Well-to-wheels energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of ethanol from corn, sugarcane and cellulosic biomass for US use,” Environmental Research Letters, vol. 7, no. 4, p. 045905, Dec. 2012.
- Farrell A. E., Plevin R. J., Turner B. T., Jones A. D., Hare M. O., and Kammen D. M., “Ethanol Can Contribute to Energy and Environmental Goals,” Science, Vol 311, no. January, pp. 506-508, 2006.
- Han J., Dunn J. B., Cai H., Elgowainy A., and Wang M. Q., “Updated sugarcane parameters in GREET1_2012, Second Revision,” 2012.
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, “EPA Fuel Economy,” 2013. [Online]. Available: http://www.fueleconomy.gov/.
- Alger T. and Gingrich J., “Cooled EGR for Fuel Economy and Emissions Improvement in Gasoline Engines,” JSAE, vol. 20105013, 2010.
- Weaver C. E., “Advanced Gasoline Turbocharged Direct Injection (GTDI) Engine Development,” 2011 DOE Vehicle Technologies Program Review, vol. Project ID, 2011.
- Alger T., Gingrich J., Mangold B., and Roberts C., “A Continuous Discharge Ignition System for EGR Limit Extension in SI Engines,” SAE Int. J. Engines 4(1):677-692, 2011, doi:10.4271/2011-01-0661.
- Alger T., “SwRI's HEDGE Technology for High Efficiency, Low Emissions Gasoline Engines,” in DEER Conference, 2010, no. September.
- Lutsey N., “Review of technical literature and trends related to automobile mass-reduction technology,” California Air Resources Board, no. May, 2010.
- Cheah L. W., “Cars on a Diet : The Material and Energy Impacts of Passenger Vehicle Weight Reduction in the U.S.,” MIT, Doctoral Dissertation, 2010.
- Alger T., “SwRI HEDGE Program,” (Presentation), Southwest Research Institute, 2006.