This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Nonuniformity and NO2/NOx Ratio Effects on the SCR Performance under Transient Engine Conditions
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 01, 2014 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) systems are in use on heavy duty diesel engines for NOx control. An SCR NOx reduction efficiency of higher than 95% is required to meet the proposed increasingly stringent NOx emission standards and the 2014-2018 fuel consumption regulations. The complex engine exhaust conditions including the nonuniformity of temperature, flow, and maldistribution of NH3 present at the catalyst inlet need to be considered for improved performance of the SCR system. These factors cause the SCR to underperform negatively impacting the NOx reduction efficiency as well as the NH3 slip.
In this study, the effects of the nonuniformity of temperature, flow velocity and maldistribution of NH3 on the SCR performance were investigated using 1-dimensional (1D) model simulations for a Cu-zeolite SCR. The model was previously calibrated and validated to reactor and steady-state and transient engine experimental data. The SCR engine experimental measurements collected from a transient cycle were used as the baseline for the simulations. The model was configured to include multiple axial channels running in parallel. Different inputs were assigned to the channels of the model to simulate the catalyst inlet nonuniformity. Another important factor affecting the SCR performance is the inlet NO2/NOx ratio. Its effects on the SCR NOx reduction, NH3 slip and NH3 storage under transient conditions were investigated using simulations from a single-channel version of the same model. It was determined that the SCR inlet NH3 maldistribution caused a 3.5% decrease in NOx reduction efficiency over a surrogate HD-FTP cycle. The nonuniformity of the SCR inlet temperature and exhaust mass flow rate had minimal effect on the cycle cumulative NOx reduction (<1%). Controlling the inlet NO2/NOx ratio to near 0.5 is important to achieve the optimal SCR performance.
CitationSong, X., Naber, J., and Johnson, J., "Nonuniformity and NO2/NOx Ratio Effects on the SCR Performance under Transient Engine Conditions," SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-1556, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4271/2014-01-1556.
- Johnson, T., “Diesel Emission Control in Review,” SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 2(1):1-12, 2009, doi:10.4271/2009-01-0121.
- EPA, DOT and NHTSA, “Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Medium- and Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles,” Federal Register 76FR57105, September 15, 2011.
- Girard, J., Lacin, F., Hass, C., and Hodonsky, J., “Flow Uniformity Optimization for Diesel Aftertreatment Systems,” SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-1092, 2006, doi:10.4271/2006-01-1092.
- Vikas, R., Mallikarjuna, M. J. and Ganesan, V., “3-D Numerical Study of Effect of Flow Parameters upon the Uniformity of NH3 in Urea-SCR”, Advanced Materials Research 505(2012): 175-179, 2012, doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.505.175.
- Zhang, X. and Romzek, M., “Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Applications in Vehicle Exhaust System,” SAE Technical Paper 2008-01-0612, 2008, doi:10.4271/2008-01-0612.
- Zhang, X. and Romzek, M., “3-D Numerical Study of Flow Mixing in Front of SCR for Different Injection Systems,” SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-1578, 2007, doi:10.4271/2007-01-1578.
- Martin, A., Will, N., Bordet, A., Cornet, P. et al., “Effect of Flow Distribution on Emissions Performance of Catalytic Converters,” SAE Technical Paper 980936, 1998, doi:10.4271/980936.
- Meda, L., Shu, Y., and Romzek, M., “Heavy Duty Diesel After-Treatment System Analysis Based Design: Fluid, Thermal and Structural Considerations,” SAE Technical Paper 2009-01-0624, 2009, doi:10.4271/2009-01-0624.
- Karlsson, M., Wallin, U., Fredholm, S., Jansson, J. et al., “A Combined 3D/Lumped Modeling Approach to Ammonia SCR After-treatment Systems: Application to Mixer Designs,” SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-0469, 2006, doi:10.4271/2006-01-0469.
- McKinley, T., Alleyne, A., and Lee, C., “Mixture Non-Uniformity in SCR Systems: Modeling and Uniformity Index Requirements for Steady-State and Transient Operation,” SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 3(1):486-499, 2010, doi:10.4271/2010-01-0883.
- Johansson, Å., Wallin, U., Karlsson, M., Isaksson, A. et al., “Investigation on Uniformity Indices Used for Diesel Exhaust Aftertreatment Systems,” SAE Technical Paper 2008-01-0613, 2008, doi:10.4271/2008-01-0613.
- Tai, P., Shu, Y., and Romzek, M., “Enhancement of Flow Distribution and Pressure Drop Performance of SCR System for Commercial Vehicles,” SAE Technical Paper 2013-01-1586, 2013, doi:10.4271/2013-01-1586.
- Song, X., Parker, G., Johnson, J., Naber, J. et al., “A Modeling Study of SCR Reaction Kinetics from Reactor Experiments,” SAE Technical Paper 2013-01-1576, 2013, doi:10.4271/2013-01-1576.
- Song, X., Naber, J., Johnson, J., and Parker, G., “An Experimental and Modeling Study of Reaction Kinetics for a Cu-Zeolite SCR Catalyst Based on Engine Experiments,” SAE Technical Paper 2013-01-1054, 2013, doi:10.4271/2013-01-1054.
- Grossale, A., Nova, I., Tronconi, E., Chatterjee, D., et al., “NH3-NO/NO2 SCR for Diesel Exhausts Aftertreatment: Reactivity, Mechanism and Kinetic Modelling of Commercial Fe- and Cu-Promoted Zeolite Catalysts”, Top Catal 52(2009): 1837-1841, 2009, doi:10.1007/s11244-009-9354-6.
- Song, X., Naber, J. D. and Johnson, J. H., “A Study of the Effects of NH3 Maldistribution on an Urea-SCR System”, International Journal of Engine Research 2013. (In Review)