This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
The Psychological and Accident Reconstruction “Thresholds” of Drivers' Detection of Relative Velocity
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 01, 2014 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Relative velocity detection thresholds of drivers are one factor that determines their ability to avoid rear-end crashes. Laboratory, simulator and driving studies show that drivers could scale relative velocity when it exceeded the threshold of about 0.003 rad/sec. Studies using accident reconstruction have suggested that the threshold may be about ten times larger. This paper discusses this divergence and suggests reasons for it and concludes that the lower value should be used as a true measure of the psychological threshold for detection of relative velocity.
|Technical Paper||Quantifying Retroreflective DOT-C2 Tape Performance using a Retroreflectometer|
|Technical Paper||Lug Nut Trace Analysis to Determine Velocity Ratio|
|Technical Paper||Driver Characteristics at Signal-Controlled Intersections|
CitationMortimer, R., Hoffmann, E., and Kiefer, A., "The Psychological and Accident Reconstruction “Thresholds” of Drivers' Detection of Relative Velocity," SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-0437, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4271/2014-01-0437.
- Mortimer, R., “Car-Following Evaluation of Braking Deceleration Level Signals,” SAE Technical Paper 810188, 1981, doi:10.4271/810188.
- Young, S. K., Eberhard, C.A., Moffa, P.J., “Development of performance specifications for collision avoidance systems for lane change merging and backing. Task 2: Functional goals establishment,” TRW Space and Electronics group, NHTSA, USDOT, 1995.
- Solomon, D., “Accidents on main rural highways related to speed, driver and vehicle,” U.S. Bureau of Public Roads, Washington, D.C., 1964.
- Hoffmann, E.R., “Note on detection of vehicle velocity changes,” Human Factors 8(2), 139-141, 1966.
- Bierley, R.L., “Investigation of an intervehicle spacing display,” General Motors Corporation, Report GMR-389, 1963.
- Hoffmann, E.R., & Mortimer, R.G., “Drivers' estimates of time to collision,” Accident Analysis and Prevention 26(4), 511-520, 1994.
- Hoffmann, E.R., & Mortimer, R.G., “Scaling of relative velocity between vehicles,” Accident Analysis and Prevention 28(4), 415-421, 1996.
- Maddox, M.E., & Kiefer, A., “Looming threshold limits and their use in forensic practice,” Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 700-704, 2012.
- Plotkin, S.C., “Multiple Causation,” Chapter 10 in Peters, G.A., & Peters, B.J., ed. Automotive Engineering and Litigation, Vol. 1, New York: Garland Law Publishing, 215-228, 1984.
- Muttart, J., Messerschmidt, W., and Gillen, L., “Relationship Between Relative Velocity Detection and Driver Response Times in Vehicle Following Situations,” SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-0427, 2005, doi:10.4271/2005-01-0427.
- Triggs, T.J., & Harris, W.G., “Reaction time of drivers to road stimuli,” Human Factors Report No. HFR-12, June 1982, Department of Psychology, Monash University, Victoria, Australia, 1982.
- Hoffmann, E.R., “Accelerator-to-brake movement times,” Ergonomics, 34(3), 277-287, 1991.
- Mazzae, E.N., Barickman, F.S., Forkenbrock, G., Baldwin, G.H., “NHTSA light vehicle antilock brake system research program Task 5.2/5.3: test track examination of drivers' collision avoidance behavior using conventional and antilock brakes,” NHTSA, USDOT, Report DOT-HS-809-561, 2003.
- Summala, H., “Driver/vehicle steering response latencies,” Human Factors 23(6), 683-692, 1981.
- Baker, C.A., & Steedman, W.C., “Perceived movement in depth as a function of luminance and velocity,” Human Factors 3(3), 166-173, 1961.
- Mortimer, R.G., “The value of an accelerator release signal,” Human Factors 13(5), 481-486, 1971.
- Mortimer, R.G., “Weber's law and rear-end collisions,” Michigan Academician, 5(1), 99-105, 1972.
- Kiefer, R.J., Flanagan, C.A., Jerome, C.J., “Time to collision judgments under realistic driving conditions,” Human Factors 48(2), 334-345, 2006.
- Braunstein, M.L., & Laughery, K.R., “Detection of vehicle velocity changes during expressway driving,” Human Factors 6(4), 327-331, 1964.
- Wann, J.P., Poulter, D.R., Purcell, C., “Reduced sensitivity to visual looming inflates the risk posed by speeding vehicles when children try to cross the road,” Psychological Science 1-6, 2011, doi:10:1177/0956797611400917.
- Lamble, D., Laakso, M., Summala, H., “Detection thresholds in car following situations and peripheral vision: implications for positioning of visually demanding in-car displays,” Ergonomics 42(6), 807-815, 1999.