This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Vehicle Cycle Analysis Comparison of Battery Electric Vehicle and Conventional Vehicle in China
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published October 14, 2013 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
The encouragement for the development of battery electric vehicles (BEVs) has increased in China, especially after the automotive industry planning in 2009. In general, BEVs are associated with a cleaner and more efficient mobility during operation; however the benefits of substituting BEVs for internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs) must be evaluated. Vehicle cycle analyses are important tools that provide a comprehensive approach to compare the environmental effects of advanced and conventional vehicles.
The goal of this study is to estimate and compare the vehicle cycle energy and emission impacts of a mid-size passenger BEV with a mid-size passenger ICEV in China. It is found that the material production accounts for the majority of the vehicle cycle energy consumption and emissions for the two vehicle types. Comparing the vehicle cycle of the BEV and ICEV, the energy consumption of BEV is 40.0% higher than that of ICEV and the total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of BEV is 44.6% higher than that of ICEV, due to the use of energy-intensive materials in the power battery of BEV.
Meanwhile, the fuel cycle analyses are used in conjunction with the vehicle cycle analyses to estimate the full automobile lifecycle results. It is found that in the terms of the full life cycle of the ICEV and BEV, the overall energy use of the BEV is 26.6% lower than that of ICEV and the overall GHG emissions of BEV is 12.8% lower than that of ICEV.
CitationLi, S., Li, J., LI, N., and Gao, Y., "Vehicle Cycle Analysis Comparison of Battery Electric Vehicle and Conventional Vehicle in China," SAE Technical Paper 2013-01-2581, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4271/2013-01-2581.
- National Bureau of Statistics of China, “China Statistical Yearbook 2011,” Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2011. (In Chinese)
- Shi, L., Huang, Y., Yu, J., “Study of transport energy consumption and carbon emissions (2011),” Beijing: China economic publishing house, 2011. (In Chinese)
- Moon, P., Burnham, A., and Wang, M., “Vehicle-Cycle Energy and Emission Effects of Conventional and Advanced Vehicles,” SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-0375, 2006, doi:10.4271/2006-01-0375.
- Aguirre, K., Eisenhardt, L., Lim, C., Nelson, B., Norring, A., Slowik, P., Tu, N., “Lifecycle analysis comparison of a battery electric vehicle and a conventional gasoline vehicle,” UCLA, June 2012.
- Maclean, H. L.; Lave, L. B., “Life cycle assessment of automobile/fuel options. Environ,” Sci. Technol., 37(23): 5445-5452, 2003.
- ISO. ISO 14040, “Environmental Management - Life Cycle Assessment - Principles and Framework,” Geneva, 2006.
- Li, S., Li, N., Gao, Y., Li, J., “Vehicle Cycle Environmental Impacts Assessment of a China Passenger Car,” ICBEB 2012, Macau, 2012.
- Hawkins, T.R., Singh, B., Majeau-Bettez, G., Strømman, A.H., “Comparative Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Conventional and Electric Vehicles,” Journal of Industrial Ecology, 1(17): 53-64, 2013.
- Li, S., Li, J., Li, N., Lu, Q., Tong, D., Gao, Y., “Evaluation of Environmental Impacts of Traction Motor Production and Disposal,” Transactions of Tianjin University, accepted, 2013.
- Zamel, N., Li, X., “Life cycle analysis of vehicles powered by a fuel cell and by internal combustion engine for Canada,” J. Power Sources, (155): 297-310, 2006.
- Li, S., Li, N., Li, J., Gao, Y., “Vehicle Cycle Energy and Carbon Dioxide Analysis of a China Passenger Car,” AASRI Procedia, (2): 25-30, 2012.
- van Vliet, O., Brouwer, A.S., Kuramochi, T., van den Broek, M., Faaij, A., “Energy use, cost and CO2 emissions of electric cars,” J. Power Sources, (196): 2298-2310, 2011.
- Burnham, A., Wang M., Wu, Y., “Development and applications of GREET 2.7 - the transportation vehicle-cycle model,” ANL/ESD/06-5, Argonne, November 2006.
- China Electricity Council, “Statistical Bulletin of China National Electric Power Industry 2010,” Beijing, Feb. 2011. [In Chinese]
- Biona, J.B.M., Culaba, A.B., Purvis, M.R.I., “Fuel cycle analysis based evaluation of the fuel and emissions reduction potential of adapting the hybrid technology to tricycles,” Clean Technologies Environmental Policy, 1(10): 31-38, 2008.
- Maduro, M., “Well-to-Wheel greenhouse gas emissions and energy use analysis of hypothetical fleet of electrified vehicles in Canada and the U.S.,” University of Ontario Institute of Technology, December 2012.
- Elgowainy, A., Burnham, A., Wang, M., Molburg, J. et al., “Well-To-Wheels Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles,” SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 2(1):627-644, 2009, doi:10.4271/2009-01-1309.
- Maduro, M. and Rohrauer, G., “Well-To-Wheel Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis of Hypothetical Fleet of Electrified Vehicles in Canada and the U.S.,” SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-0910, 2011, doi:10.4271/2011-01-0910.
- Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China, “Limits of fuel consumption for passenger cars (GB 19578-2004),” China, 2004. (In Chinese)