This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Dual Use IVHM for UAS Health Management
Technical Paper
2013-01-2202
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
This content contains downloadable datasets
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
UAS (Unmanned aircraft system), widely known to the general public as drones, are comprised of two major system elements: an Unmanned Aircraft (UA) and a Ground Control Station (GCS). UAS have a high mishap rate when compared to manned aircraft. This high mishap rate is one of several barriers to the acceptance of UAS for more widespread usage.
Better awareness of the UA real time as well as long term health situation may allow timely condition based maintenance. Vehicle health and usage are two parts of the same solution to improve vehicle safety and lifecycle costs. These can be worked on through the use of two related aircraft management methods, these are: IVHM (Integrated Vehicle Health Management) which combines diagnosis and prognosis methods to help manage aircraft health and maintenance, and FOQA (Flight Operations Quality Assurance) systems which are mainly used to assist in pilot skill quality assurance.
However, the addition of IVHM and FOQA systems to a UA, no matter how valuable, will face tight requirements on their weight, volume, and power consumption. In this environment, the dual use of aircraft sensors for control and IVHM/FOQA will remove the need to install a completely separate system. The paper explores the concept of dual use, its features and some experiments to start to examine this new method of combining Control, IVHM, & FOQA.
Recommended Content
Authors
Topic
Citation
Pelham, J., Fan, I., Jennions, I., and McFeat, J., "Dual Use IVHM for UAS Health Management," SAE Technical Paper 2013-01-2202, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4271/2013-01-2202.Data Sets - Support Documents
| Title | Description | Download |
|---|---|---|
| [Unnamed Dataset 1] | ||
| [Unnamed Dataset 2] |
Also In
References
- Office of the Secretary of Defense, “UAV Reliability Study,”, 2003.
- United States Air Force, “AIR FORCE SAFETY AND ACCIDENT BOARD INVESTIGATIONS,” http://www.acc.af.mil/library/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=2356, March/25.
- Hartfield, R., Carpenter, M., Randall, W. and Hundley, J., “Unmanned Air Vehicles (UAV): Safety Event Prediction, and Classification,” 12th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations (ATIO) Conference and 14th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, 2012.
- Redmond W., “AIR FORCE INSTRUCTION 91-204: SAFETY INVESTIGATIONS AND REPORTS,”, 2008.
- United States Air Force, “United States Air Force Accident Investigation Board Reports,” http://usaf.aib.law.af.mil/, March/25.
- Weissberg, V., Green, A. and Mey-Paz, H., “The birth of specialized airframe technology for UAVs,” 52nd Israel Annual Conference on Aerospace Sciences 2012, 2012.
- Jennions, I., “Integrated Vehicle Health Management: Perspectives on an Emerging Field,” SAE International, Warrendale, PA, ISBN 978-0-7680-6432-2, 2011, doi:10.4271/R-405.
- Aaseng, G. B., “Blueprint for an integrated vehicle health management system,” Digital Avionics Systems, 2001. DASC. 20th Conference, 2001.
- Scandura, P. A. Jr., “Integrated vehicle health management as a system engineering discipline,” 24th DASC: 24th Digital Avionics Systems Conference, 2005.
- Walther B., “Open Systems Architecture for Condition-based Maintenance (OSA-CBM) Primer,”, 2006.
- ISO, “ISO 13374-1, Condition monitoring and diagnostics of machines - Data processing, communication and presentation - Part 1: General Guidelines.” ISO 13374-1, 2002.
- Gorinevsky, D., Smotrich, A., Mah, R., Srivastava, A., Keller, K. and Felke, T., “Open architecture for integrated vehicle health management,” AIAA Infotech at Aerospace 2010, 2010.
- Holtom M., “Properly managed FOQA programme represents an important safety tool for airlines.” ICAO Journal 55(1):7-26, 2000.
- Civil Aviation Authority, “CAP 739: Flight Data Monitoring,”, 2003.
- Lawson C.P. and Monterzino G.A.I., “Design Manufacturing Integration and flight testing of a health monitoring system for a prototype unmanned airborne vehicle (Accepted for publication and due to appear Spring 2013),” Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2013.
- Paris, D.E.a,, Trevino, L.C.b, Watson, M.D., “A framework for integration of IVHM technologies for intelligent integration for vehicle management,” Aerospace Conference, 2005 IEEE, 2005.
- Sudolsky, M.D., “IVHM solutions using commercially-available aircraft condition monitoring systems,” 2007 IEEE Aerospace Conference, 2007.
- ENDSLEY M. and BOLSTA D C., “Human capabilities and limitations in situation awareness,” AGARD, Combat Automation for Airborne Weapon Systems: Man/Machine Interface Trends and Technologies 10 p(SEE N 93-28850 11-54), 1993.
- Rasmussen J., “Skills, rules, and knowledge; signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models,” Systems, Man and Cybernetics, IEEE Transactions on SMC-13(3):257-266, 1983.
- Bracknell D., “Introduction to the Mil-Std-1553B serial multiplex data bus,” Microprocessors and Microsystems 12(1):3-12, 1988.
- Berger S., “ARINC 629 digital communication system-application on the 777 and beyond,” Microprocessors and Microsystems 20(8):463-471, 1997.
- Prisaznuk, P.J., “ARINC 653 role in Integrated Modular Avionics (IMA),” Digital Avionics Systems Conference, 2008. DASC 2008. IEEE/AIAA 27th, 2008.
- Gaska, T., Werner, B., Flagg, D., “Applying virtualization to avionics systems- The integration challenges,” Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), 2010 IEEE/AIAA 29th, 2010.
- Han, S., Jin, H.-W., “Full virtualization based ARINC 653 partitioning,” 30th Digital Avionics Systems Conference - Closing the Generation Gap: Increasing Capability for Flight Operations among Legacy, Modern and Uninhabited Aircraft, DASC 2011, 2011.
- Sudolsky, M.D., “ARINC 573/717, 767 and 647A: The Logical Choice for Maintenance Recording And IVHM Interface Control or Frame Updates,” Annual Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society, 2009.
- Shrouder S., “DEMON UAV - Flying Without Flaps,” http://www.baesystems.com/cs/groups/public/documents/digitalmedia/mdaw/mdyx/∼edisp/∼extract/BAES_051901∼1∼staticrendition/492×277.jpg, January. 2013.
- Fielding J. P., Lawson C. P., Martins-Pires R. M., Monterzino G. A. I., “Design, Build and Flight of The DEMON Demonstrator UAV,” 11th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations (ATIO) Conference, including the AIAA Balloon Systems Conference and 19th AIAA Lighter-Than, 2011.
- Fawcett T., “An introduction to ROC analysis,” Pattern Recog.Lett. 27(8):861-874, 2006.
- Heaton, A., Fan, I., Lawson, C. P. and McFeat, J., “A Business Case for IVHM on Commercial UAS,” UAS Operations: Dependable, Effective and Efficent?, 2012.
- Warrington, L., Jones, J. A. and Davis, N., “Modelling of maintenance, within discrete event simulation,” Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, The International Symposium on Produc Quality and Integrity, 2002.
- Jones, J., Warrington, L. and Davis, N., “The use of a discrete event simulation to model the achievement of maintenance free operating time for aerospace systems,” International Symposium on Product Quality and Integrity, 2001.